Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Ten Simple Rules to becoming a principal investigator

Journal Article · · PLoS Computational Biology (Online)
 [1];  [2]
  1. Imperial College, London (United Kingdom)
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Oregon Health & Sciences Univ., Portland, OR (United States)
The biggest choke point in an academic career is going from postdoc to principal investigator (PI), moving from doing someone else’s research to getting other people to do yours. It is not an easy transition, draws on few of the skills you learn at the bench and the odds are clearly not ever in your favour. So calling this article ten simple rules is obviously a simplification: it is more accurate to call them ten tricky steps. In this article, we use Principal Investigator to mean anyone who runs their own research group, using funding that they have been awarded to answer their own questions. PI encompasses a number of different job titles depending on where the research is performed – fellow, lecturer, associate professor, senior scientist. The acid test is whether you can describe the people working for you as the X group, where X is your surname. The normal route from undergraduate to lab head involves a PhD, one or most postdoc positions and then PI. Given the diversity of ways to be a PI, the final step up from postdoc takes a number of forms – in the UK this tends to be either an individual fellowship or a lecturer position, in the US it generally starts with an independent position with associated funding – either as a startup package or funded grant. The aim of this article is to identify some of the broader skills (rules 1-4) and behaviours (rules 5-10) that can help with becoming a PI. They are meant as advice, not instruction. As you will see, most of them are soft/ leadership skills, which can as easily be applied to the world outside academia as within it.
Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1605356
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA--146497
Journal Information:
PLoS Computational Biology (Online), Journal Name: PLoS Computational Biology (Online) Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 16; ISSN 1553-7358
Publisher:
Public Library of ScienceCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (12)

Publication metrics and success on the academic job market journal June 2014
No researcher is too junior to fix science journal May 2017
How will you judge me if not by impact factor? journal June 2018
Drawing connections journal June 2017
From parade ground to PI journal January 2018
Towards a career in bioinformatics journal December 2009
Ten Simple Rules for Writing a PLOS Ten Simple Rules Article journal October 2014
Ten simple rules for drawing scientific comics journal January 2018
Omissions from a National Institute of Health (NIH) biosketch journal May 2018
Towards a career in bioinformatics journal December 2009
Postdocs' perceptions of work environment and career prospects at a US academic institution journal December 2009
Intellectual Self-doubt and How to Get Out of It journal March 2018

Similar Records

Strategies for seeking a job at a national lab [Slides]
Technical Report · Fri Sep 04 00:00:00 EDT 2020 · OSTI ID:1659149

Selection, testing, operation, and mainatenance of electronic flow computers
Conference · Thu Nov 30 23:00:00 EST 1995 · OSTI ID:146311

Are you insulated?
Journal Article · Sun Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1995 · Mother Earth News · OSTI ID:200381