skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Elevated Seismic Hazard in Kansas Due to High‐Volume Injections in Oklahoma

Journal Article · · Geophysical Research Letters
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085705· OSTI ID:1603828
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University Tempe AZ USA, Department of Earth and Planetary Science University of California Berkeley CA USA, Berkeley Seismological Laboratory University of California Berkeley CA USA
  2. School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University Tempe AZ USA
  3. Department of Earth and Planetary Science University of California Berkeley CA USA, Berkeley Seismological Laboratory University of California Berkeley CA USA

Abstract Induced seismicity has expanded into south‐central Kansas, an area with rare damaging natural earthquakes, leading to the second‐highest seismicity rate in the central United States after Oklahoma. Here we assess the mechanical effects of large‐scale injection in the combined area of western Oklahoma and southern Kansas during 2010–2018 and its link to the observed seismicity using physics‐based hydromechanical and seismicity rate models. Such models link injection operations to seismic hazards and allow solving for the spatially variable distribution of background seismic productivity that yields an acceptable match between the observed and modeled seismicity. We show that injection in Oklahoma amplifies the total Coulomb stress change and seismicity rate by 1.5‐fold and threefold, respectively, in south‐central Kansas. This cross‐border interaction modulates the annual earthquake probability in Kansas. We conclude that the issue of induced seismicity is not a local problem due to the far‐reaching effects of fluid diffusion.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
DE‐SC0019307
OSTI ID:
1603828
Journal Information:
Geophysical Research Letters, Journal Name: Geophysical Research Letters Vol. 47 Journal Issue: 5; ISSN 0094-8276
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 10 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (46)

3-D Modeling of Induced Seismicity Along Multiple Faults: Magnitude, Rate, and Location in a Poroelasticity System journal November 2018
Myths and Facts on Wastewater Injection, Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhanced Oil Recovery, and Induced Seismicity journal June 2015
Deep-Injection and Closely Monitored Induced Seismicity at Paradox Valley, Colorado journal April 2005
Fluid Injection and Time-Dependent Seismic Hazard in the Barnett Shale, Texas journal May 2018
Injection-Induced Earthquakes journal July 2013
Constitutive Law for Earthquake Production Based on Rate-and-State Friction: Dieterich 1994 Revisited journal May 2018
Coulomb Stress Transfer Influences Fault Reactivation in Areas of Wastewater Injection journal October 2018
Two-year survey comparing earthquake activity and injection-well locations in the Barnett Shale, Texas journal August 2012
Geomechanical analysis of fluid injection and seismic fault slip for the M w 4.8 Timpson, Texas, earthquake sequence : GEOMECHANICS OF FLUID INJECTION TIMPSON journal April 2016
The 2013–2016 Induced Earthquakes in Harper and Sumner Counties, Southern Kansas journal February 2018
The susceptibility of Oklahoma’s basement to seismic reactivation journal September 2019
Fluid-induced aseismic fault slip outpaces pore-fluid migration journal May 2019
Small Earthquakes Matter in Injection-Induced Seismicity journal June 2018
Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma journal July 2019
Disposal of Hydrofracking Waste Fluid by Injection into Subsurface Aquifers Triggers Earthquake Swarm in Central Arkansas with Potential for Damaging Earthquake journal March 2012
Poisson's ratio and crustal seismology journal February 1996
Geospatial analysis of Oklahoma (USA) earthquakes (2011–2016): Quantifying the limits of regional-scale earthquake mitigation measures journal January 2018
Injection-induced seismicity: Poroelastic and earthquake nucleation effects: INJECTION INDUCED SEISMICITY journal July 2015
Accelerated Fill‐Up of the Arbuckle Group Aquifer and Links to U.S. Midcontinent Seismicity journal March 2019
The 2001-Present Induced Earthquake Sequence in the Raton Basin of Northern New Mexico and Southern Colorado journal September 2014
An updated stress map of the continental United States reveals heterogeneous intraplate stress journal May 2018
Engineering seismic risk analysis journal October 1968
Maximum magnitude estimations of induced earthquakes at Paradox Valley, Colorado, from cumulative injection volume and geometry of seismicity clusters journal November 2014
Deformation of the North American plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements: DEFORMATION OF NORTH AMERICAN PLATE journal June 2006
Rapid Response, Monitoring, and Mitigation of Induced Seismicity near Greeley, Colorado journal June 2016
Waveform‐Relocated Earthquake Catalog for Oklahoma and Southern Kansas Illuminates the Regional Fault Network journal July 2017
Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection into a deep well in Youngstown, Ohio: INDUCED SEISMICITY IN YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO journal July 2013
2018 One‐Year Seismic Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes journal March 2018
Leakage and Increasing Fluid Pressure Detected in Oklahoma's Wastewater Disposal Reservoir journal March 2019
Poroelasticity: Efficient modeling of strongly coupled, slow deformation processes in a multilayered half‐space journal March 2003
Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection journal July 2014
The 24 January 2013 ML 4.4 Earthquake near Paradox, Colorado, and Its Relation to Deep Well Injection journal May 2014
2017 One‐Year Seismic‐Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes journal March 2017
The Denver EarthquakeS journal September 1968
Earthquakes in Kansas Induced by Extremely Far‐Field Pressure Diffusion journal February 2018
Hydraulic properties of injection formations constrained by surface deformation journal June 2019
Wastewater disposal and earthquake swarm activity at the southern end of the Central Valley, California: EARTHQUAKE SWARMS AND FLUID INJECTION journal February 2016
Oklahoma's induced seismicity strongly linked to wastewater injection depth journal February 2018
Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969-1982 journal June 1985
A Rare Moderate‐Sized ( M w  4.9) Earthquake in Kansas: Rupture Process of the Milan, Kansas, Earthquake of 12 November 2014 and Its Relationship to Fluid Injection journal September 2016
The 2016 Mw5.1 Fairview, Oklahoma earthquakes: Evidence for long-range poroelastic triggering at >40 km from fluid disposal wells journal August 2017
Numerical Models of Pore Pressure and Stress Changes Along Basement Faults Due to Wastewater Injection: Applications to the 2014 Milan, Kansas Earthquake journal April 2018
A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering journal February 1994
The biases and trends in fault zone hydrogeology conceptual models: global compilation and categorical data analysis journal September 2016
Surface uplift and time-dependent seismic hazard due to fluid injection in eastern Texas journal September 2016
Poroelastic Properties of the Arbuckle Group in Oklahoma Derived from Well Fluid Level Response to the 3 September 2016 M w  5.8 Pawnee and 7 November 2016 M w  5.0 Cushing Earthquakes journal May 2017

Similar Records

Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma
Journal Article · Mon Jul 29 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · OSTI ID:1603828

Reply to Comment by Peterie Et Al. on “Accelerated Fill‐Up of the Arbuckle Group Aquifer and Links to U.S. Midcontinent Seismicity”
Journal Article · Mon Dec 07 00:00:00 EST 2020 · Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth · OSTI ID:1603828

Small Scale Field Test Demonstrating CO2 Sequestration In Arbuckle Saline Aquifer And By CO2-Eor At Wellington Field, Sumner County, Kansas
Technical Report · Sun Dec 31 00:00:00 EST 2017 · OSTI ID:1603828

Related Subjects