Life-Cycle Assessment of Alternative Pyrolysis-Based Transport Fuels: Implications of Upgrading Technology, Scale, and Hydrogen Requirement

Journal Article · Mon Aug 06 04:00:00 EDT 2018 · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01266· OSTI ID:1578065

Sorunmu, Yetunde E. ^[1]; Billen, Pieter ^[2]; Elangovan, Elango ^[3]; Santosa, Daniel M. ^[4]; Spatari, Sabrina ^[2]

---

1. VISITORS
2. Drexel University
3. Ceramatec Inc
4. BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)

In an effort to diversify liquid fuel supply and address climate change, there are ongoing studies on the use of biomass as a renewable source of energy. Bio-oil produced from fast pyrolysis of biomass is a promising substitute for fossil fuels that can meet climate change mitigation goals, spur rural economies, and diversify liquid fuel supply. However, for bio-oil to be used as a transportation fuel, it requires upgrading to remove oxygen present in the oil. Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is one means of upgrading fast pyrolysis oil, however, one of its main limitations is a large hydrogen requirement. We evaluate an alternative electrochemical deoxygenation (EDOx) method that uses catalytic electrode membranes on a ceramic, oxygen permeable support, to generate hydrogen in-situ for deoxygenation at the cathode and remove oxygen at the anode. We analyze the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and scale effects of gas-phase upgrading pyrolysis oil (300 metric tons per day (MTPD)) using EDOx, which reduces energy needs for condensing the pyrolysis gas to bio-oil prior to deoxygenation. The dispersed woody biomass can be accessed and thus more efficiently used if a small scale process is used to densify and stabilize the bio-oil product. We evaluate two configurations of the small-scale deoxygenation, full electrochemical deoxygenation (EDOx), which removes 100% of oxygen present in the bio-oil and partial EDOx, which removes 96% of oxygen present in the bio-oil and compare them to the large scale (2000 MTPD) deoxygenation (HDO). The partial EDOx process has the lowest total GHG emissions of 4.95 gCO2 eq. and 7.43 gCO2 eq. per MJ of a vehicle operated with diesel and gasoline respectively compared to full EDOx (8.36 g CO2 eq. diesel, 10.86 g CO2 eq. gasoline) and HDO (39 gCO2 eq. per MJ for diesel and gasoline). In addition, with the EDOx processes, we can site 10 times more small-scale pyrolysis upgrading sites compared to HDO, suggesting that small-scale on-site partial or full deoxygenation can reach more inaccessible forest biomass resources.

• Research Organization: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE
• DOE Contract Number: AC05-76RL01830
• OSTI ID: 1578065
• Report Number(s): PNNL-SA-133675
• Journal Information: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Journal Name: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Journal Issue: 8 Vol. 6
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

bio-oil hydrotreating
Biomass
deoxygenation
solid oxide fuel cell
pyrolysis bio-oil
pyrolysis
upgrading