Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Disentangling magnification in combined shear-clustering analyses

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
 [1];  [2];  [2]
  1. Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK, Perimeter Institute, 31 Caroline Street North, Waterloo, ON N2L 2Y5, Canada, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
  2. Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK
ABSTRACT

We investigate the sensitivity to the effects of lensing magnification on large-scale structure analyses combining photometric cosmic shear and galaxy clustering data (i.e. the now commonly called ‘3 × 2-point’ analysis). Using a Fisher matrix bias formalism, we disentangle the contribution to the bias on cosmological parameters caused by ignoring the effects of magnification in a theory fit from individual elements in the data vector, for Stage-III and Stage-IV surveys. We show that the removal of elements of the data vectors that are dominated by magnification does not guarantee a reduction in the cosmological bias due to the magnification signal, but can instead increase the sensitivity to magnification. We find that the most sensitive elements of the data vector come from the shear-clustering cross-correlations, particularly between the highest redshift shear bin and any lower redshift lens sample, and that the parameters ΩM, $$S_8=\sigma _8\sqrt{\Omega _\mathrm{ M}/0.3}$$, and w0 show the most significant biases for both survey models. Our forecasts predict that current analyses are not significantly biased by magnification, but this bias will become highly significant with the continued increase of statistical power in the near future. We therefore conclude that future surveys should measure and model the magnification as part of their flagship ‘3 × 2-point’ analysis.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1576662
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 491; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

References (29)

Weak lensing power spectra for precision cosmology: Multiple-deflection, reduced shear, and lensing bias corrections journal November 2010
Simultaneous measurement of cosmology and intrinsic alignments using joint cosmic shear and galaxy number density correlations journal November 2010
Weak lensing magnification of SpARCS galaxy clusters journal December 2017
Euclid preparation : IV. Impact of undetected galaxies on weak-lensing shear measurements⋆ journal July 2019
The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. journal January 1953
The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. II. journal January 1954
Weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies journal March 1992
Second‐Order Corrections to Weak Lensing by Large‐Scale Structure journal July 2002
The dark Energy Camera journal October 2015
Lensing bias in Cosmic Shear journal August 2009
Cluster mass Profiles from a Bayesian Analysis of Weak-Lensing Distortion and Magnification Measurements: Applications to Subaru data journal February 2011
The CLASSgal code for relativistic cosmological large scale structure journal November 2013
The Dark Energy Survey Image Processing Pipeline journal May 2018
A Detection of Weak-Lensing Magnification Using Galaxy Sizes and Magnitudes journal December 2011
Gravitational lensing of distant field galaxies by rich clusters - I. Faint galaxy redshift distributions journal September 1994
Inferring the mass of submillimetre galaxies by exploiting their gravitational magnification of background galaxies journal January 2013
On the complementarity of galaxy clustering with cosmic shear and flux magnification journal November 2013
Weak lensing with sizes, magnitudes and shapes journal July 2015
Mitigating systematic errors in angular correlation function measurements from wide field surveys journal October 2015
Observational biases in flux magnification measurements journal December 2015
Cluster mass profile reconstruction with size and flux magnification on the HST STAGES survey journal January 2016
KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering journal October 2017
KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering journal March 2018
Einstein's legacy in galaxy surveys journal June 2015
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Constraints on extended cosmological models from galaxy clustering and weak lensing journal June 2019
Size Bias in Galaxy Surveys journal July 2009
Systematic bias in cosmic shear: extending the Fisher matrix journal November 2008
Measuring the galaxy-mass and galaxy-dust correlations through magnification and reddening: Magnification and dust reddening journal May 2010
The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1 journal November 2018

Similar Records

Forecasting the potential of weak lensing magnification to enhance LSST large-scale structure analyses
Journal Article · Wed Mar 30 20:00:00 EDT 2022 · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · OSTI ID:1865510

Cosmic shear cosmology beyond two-point statistics: a combined peak count and correlation function analysis of DES-Y1
Journal Article · Fri Jun 11 20:00:00 EDT 2021 · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · OSTI ID:1808217

Related Subjects