skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Limited-In-Scope Comparison of Subsidence Scenarios For 3D Vadose Zone PORFLOW Trench Models

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1572881· OSTI ID:1572881
 [1]
  1. Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River National Lab. (SRNL)

This technical memorandum summarizes the results from two separate sequences of 3D PORFLOW vadose zone flow and contaminant transport models that were used to test the impact of different spatial distributions of subsidence boundary conditions. More specifically, the two simulation setups used a general conceptual model for an engineered trench (ET): one with a subsided region specified in the center of the trench and one with a subsided region located at the end of the trench. Both subsided regions had the same geometric specifications (e.g., length, width, orientation), but used water infiltration rate boundary conditions that appropriately accounted for surface runoff and lateral drainage from the adjacent upslope intact regions of the final closure cap. Because of the substantially higher water infiltration rate associated with the subsided region at the end of the trench, this geometry produced higher absolute peak fluxes to the water table for all six radionuclides that were simulated. However, the slower release rate of the centrally located subsided hole geometry produced a higher flux to the water table in the time period subsequent to the absolute peak. A third model was implemented as a control, where the water infiltration rate that corresponds to the centrally located subsided region was applied at the end of the trench to highlight the purely geometric effects. The results show that a higher water infiltration rate produces a sharper peak, while a lower infiltration rate leads to a broader peak. A centrally located hole impacts more of the waste zone, producing a higher peak when an equal infiltration rate is applied. These generalized qualitative differences, and their impacts on the overall modeling workflow (i.e., from vadose zone models to limits and dose calculations), should receive appropriate consideration during the development of conceptual models.

Research Organization:
Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River National Lab. (SRNL)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM)
DOE Contract Number:
AC09-08SR22470
OSTI ID:
1572881
Report Number(s):
SRNL-STI-2019-00636; TRN: US2100512
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English