skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Aftershock deficiency of induced earthquake sequences during rapid mitigation efforts in Oklahoma

Journal Article · · Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Induced seismicity provides a rare opportunity to study earthquake triggering and underlying stress perturbations. Triggering can be a direct result of induced stress changes or indirect due to elastic stress transfer from preceding events leading to aftershocks. Both of these processes are observable in areas with larger magnitude induced events, such as Oklahoma. We study aftershock sequences of M2.5 to M5.8 earthquakes and examine the impact of targeted injection rate reductions. In comparing aftershock productivity between California and Oklahoma, we find similar exponential scaling statistics between mainshock magnitude and average number of aftershocks. For events with M≥4.5 Oklahoma exhibits several mainshocks with total number of aftershocks significantly below the average scaling behavior. The sequences with deficient aftershock numbers also experienced rapid, strong mitigation and reduced injection rates, whereas two events with M4.8 and M5.0 with weak mitigation exhibit normal aftershock productivity. The timing of when aftershock activity is reduced correlates with drops in injection rates with a lag time of several days. Large mainshocks with significantly reduced aftershocks may explain decreasing seismicity rates while seismic moment release was still increasing in Oklahoma in 2016. We investigate the expected poroelastic stress perturbations due to injection rate changes within a layered axisymmetric model and find that stresses are lowered by 10s to 100s kPa within the injection-affected zone. For earthquakes induced by poroelastic stress-increase at several kilometers from wells, the rapid shut-in of wells may lead to elastic stress reductions sufficiently high to arrest unfolding aftershock sequences within days after mitigation starts.

Research Organization:
Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0015539
OSTI ID:
1564385
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1612296
Journal Information:
Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Journal Name: Earth and Planetary Science Letters Vol. 522 Journal Issue: C; ISSN 0012-821X
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Netherlands
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 23 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (44)

Comment on “How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?” by C. Langenbruch and M. D. Zoback journal August 2017
Earthquake clusters in southern California I: Identification and stability: IDENTIFICATION OF EARTHQUAKE CLUSTERS journal June 2013
Injection-Induced Earthquakes journal July 2013
Modeling Earthquake Rate Changes in Oklahoma and Arkansas: Possible Signatures of Induced Seismicity journal September 2013
Proximity of Precambrian basement affects the likelihood of induced seismicity in the Appalachian, Illinois, and Williston Basins, central and eastern United States journal April 2018
Clustering Analysis of Seismicity and Aftershock Identification journal June 2008
Waveform Relocated Earthquake Catalog for Southern California (1981 to June 2011) journal October 2012
Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data journal November 2009
Anthropogenic Seismicity Rates and Operational Parameters at the Salton Sea Geothermal Field journal July 2013
Estimating the crust permeability from fluid-injection-induced seismic emission at the KTB site journal November 1997
High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity journal June 2015
A reservoir analysis of the Denver earthquakes: A case of induced seismicity journal February 1981
Horizontal aquifer movement in a Theis-Thiem confined system journal April 1994
Earthquake Hazard After a Mainshock in California journal March 1989
Injection-induced seismicity: Poroelastic and earthquake nucleation effects: INJECTION INDUCED SEISMICITY journal July 2015
Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip journal June 2015
An Experiment in Earthquake Control at Rangely, Colorado journal March 1976
Injection-induced seismicity on basement faults including poroelastic stressing: INDUCED SEISMICITY ON BASEMENT FAULTS journal April 2016
The 2001-Present Induced Earthquake Sequence in the Raton Basin of Northern New Mexico and Southern Colorado journal September 2014
Importance of small earthquakes for stress transfers and earthquake triggering journal January 2005
Seismicity on Basement Faults Induced by Simultaneous Fluid Injection–Extraction journal June 2016
The spatial footprint of injection wells in a global compilation of induced earthquake sequences journal August 2018
Waveform‐Relocated Earthquake Catalog for Oklahoma and Southern Kansas Illuminates the Regional Fault Network journal July 2017
Induced earthquake magnitudes are as large as (statistically) expected: INDUCED EARTHQUAKE MAXIMUM MAGNITUDES journal June 2016
Oklahoma experiences largest earthquake during ongoing regional wastewater injection hazard mitigation efforts: The 3 September 2016, journal January 2017
Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection: Limits on fluid injection earthquakes journal February 2014
Differentiating induced and natural seismicity using space-time-magnitude statistics applied to the Coso Geothermal field: INDUCED AND NATURAL SEISMICITY AT COSO journal August 2015
The Effects of Varying Injection Rates in Osage County, Oklahoma, on the 2016 M w  5.8 Pawnee Earthquake journal May 2017
Potentially induced earthquakes in Oklahoma, USA: Links between wastewater injection and the 2011 Mw 5.7 earthquake sequence journal June 2013
Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection journal July 2014
Evaluating the effectiveness of induced seismicity mitigation: Numerical modeling of wastewater injection near Greeley, Colorado: Modeling Wastewater Injection, Greeley journal August 2017
Wastewater disposal and earthquake swarm activity at the southern end of the Central Valley, California: EARTHQUAKE SWARMS AND FLUID INJECTION journal February 2016
Oklahoma's induced seismicity strongly linked to wastewater injection depth journal February 2018
Assessing whether the 2017 M w 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event journal April 2018
The 2016 Mw5.1 Fairview, Oklahoma earthquakes: Evidence for long-range poroelastic triggering at >40 km from fluid disposal wells journal August 2017
A comparison of seismicity rates and fluid-injection operations in Oklahoma and California: Implications for crustal stresses journal June 2015
Fluid mass sources and point forces in linear elastic diffusive solids journal December 1986
Discriminating Characteristics of Tectonic and Human‐Induced Seismicity journal April 2016
Evidence for coupled seismic and aseismic fault slip during water injection in the geothermal site of Soultz (France), and implications for seismogenic transients journal May 2007
A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering journal February 1994
Observations of static Coulomb stress triggering of the November 2011 M 5.7 Oklahoma earthquake sequence journal March 2014
A comparison of long-term changes in seismicity at The Geysers, Salton Sea, and Coso geothermal fields: CA GEOTHERMAL FIELD SEISMICITY CHANGES journal January 2016
Fault activation by hydraulic fracturing in western Canada journal November 2016
Poroelastic Properties of the Arbuckle Group in Oklahoma Derived from Well Fluid Level Response to the 3 September 2016 M w  5.8 Pawnee and 7 November 2016 M w  5.0 Cushing Earthquakes journal May 2017