Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Halo exclusion criteria impacts halo statistics

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
 [1];  [1]
  1. Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
ABSTRACT

Every halo-finding algorithm must make a critical yet relatively arbitrary choice: it must decide which structures are parent haloes, and which structures are subhaloes of larger haloes. We refer to this choice as percolation. We demonstrate that the choice of percolation impacts the statistical properties of the resulting halo catalogue. Specifically, we modify the halo-finding algorithm rockstar to construct three different halo catalogues from the same simulation data, each with identical mass definitions, but different choice of percolation. The resulting haloes exhibit significant differences in both halo abundance and clustering properties. Differences in the halo mass function reach 6 per cent for haloes of mass $$10^{13}\ h^{-1}\ {\rm {\rm M}_{\odot }}$$, larger than the few per cent precision necessary for current cluster abundance experiments such as the Dark Energy Survey. Comparable differences are observed in the large-scale clustering bias, while differences in the halo–matter correlation function reach 30 per cent on translinear scales. These effects can bias weak-lensing estimates of cluster masses at a level comparable to the statistical precision of current state-of-the-art experiments.

Research Organization:
Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE; USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0015975
OSTI ID:
1562559
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1802783
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 489; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

References (26)

Halo models of large scale structure journal December 2002
Statistical Properties of X‐Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical Comparisons journal March 1998
Toward a Halo Mass Function for Precision Cosmology: The Limits of Universality journal December 2008
Mass Function Predictions Beyond Λcdm journal April 2011
The Rockstar Phase-Space Temporal halo Finder and the Velocity Offsets of Cluster Cores journal December 2012
Dependence of the Outer Density Profiles of Halos on Their mass Accretion rate journal June 2014
The Splashback Radius as a Physical halo Boundary and the Growth of halo mass journal August 2015
Splashback in accreting dark matter halos journal November 2014
A Method for Measuring the bias of High-Redshift Galaxies from Cosmic Variance journal June 2010
Cosmological constraints from a combination of galaxy clustering and lensing – I. Theoretical framework journal February 2013
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs journal August 2013
Halo mass function: baryon impact, fitting formulae, and implications for cluster cosmology journal December 2015
The clustering amplitude of X-ray-selected AGN at z ∼ 0.8: evidence for a negative dependence on accretion luminosity journal February 2016
Assembly bias and splashback in galaxy clusters journal June 2017
Weak lensing constraints on splashback around massive clusters journal February 2019
Long-lived photoinduced response observed under extreme photoexcitation densities in a one-dimensional Peierls insulator journal August 2018
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2 journal December 2005
Detection of the Splashback Radius and halo Assembly bias of Massive Galaxy Clusters journal June 2016
Lensing Constraints on the Mass Profile Shape and the Splashback Radius of Galaxy Clusters journal February 2017
The Halo Boundary of Galaxy Clusters in the SDSS journal May 2017
The Splashback Radius of Halos from Particle Dynamics. II. Dependence on Mass, Accretion Rate, Redshift, and Cosmology journal July 2017
The Splashback Feature around DES Galaxy Clusters: Galaxy Density and Weak Lensing Profiles journal August 2018
The Aemulus Project. II. Emulating the Halo Mass Function journal February 2019
The Splashback Radius of Planck SZ Clusters journal April 2019
The Aemulus Project. I. Numerical Simulations for Precision Cosmology journal April 2019
The Splashback Radius of Halos from Particle Dynamics. I. The SPARTA Algorithm journal July 2017

Similar Records

Subhaloes are anisotropically distributed and aligned with the smooth matter distribution of their host haloes
Journal Article · Fri Feb 21 19:00:00 EST 2025 · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · OSTI ID:2530498