skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Impact of warm‐season grass management on feedstock production on marginal farmland in Central Illinois

Journal Article · · Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12627· OSTI ID:1559353
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois
  2. Department of Agronomy University of Florida Gainesville Florida
  3. USDA/ARS Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research Unit Lincoln Nebraska
  4. Department of Agronomy Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana

Abstract The production of dedicated energy crops on marginally productive cropland is projected to play an important role in reaching the US Billion Ton goal. This study aimed to evaluate warm‐season grasses for biomass production potential under different harvest timings (summer [H1], after killing frost [H2], or alternating between two [H3]) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N/ha) on a wet marginal land across multiple production years. Six feedstocks were evaluated including Miscanthus x giganteus , two switchgrass cultivars ( Panicum virgatum L .), prairie cordgrass ( Spartina pectinata Link), and two polycultures including a mixture of big bluestem ( Andropogon gerardii Vitman), indiangrass ( Sorghastrum nutans ), and sideoats grama ( Bouteloua curtipendula [Michx.] Torr.), and a mixture of big bluestem and prairie cordgrass. Across four production years, harvest timing and feedstock type played an important role in biomass production. Miscanthus x giganteus produced the greatest biomass (18.7 Mg/ha), followed by the switchgrass cultivar “Liberty” (14.7 Mg/ha). Harvest in H1 tended to increase yield irrespective of feedstock; the exception being M. x giganteus that had significantly lower biomass when harvested in H1 when compared to H2 and H3. The advantage H1 harvest had over H2 for all feedstocks declined over time, suggesting H2 or H3 would provide greater and more sustainable biomass production for the observed feedstocks. The N application rate played an important role mainly for M. x giganteus where 112 kg N/ha yielded more biomass than no N. Other feedstocks occasionally showed a slight, but statistically insignificant increase in biomass yield with increasing N rate. This study showed the potential of producing feedstocks for bioenergy on wet marginal land; however, more research on tissue and soil nutrient dynamics under different N rates and harvest regimes will be important in understanding stand longevity for feedstocks grown under these conditions.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1559353
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1559355
Journal Information:
Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy Vol. 11 Journal Issue: 10; ISSN 1757-1693
Publisher:
Wiley-BlackwellCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 10 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (33)

Biomass for thermochemical conversion: targets and challenges journal January 2013
The feasibility of switchgrass for biofuel production journal January 2012
A quantitative review comparing the yield of switchgrass in monocultures and mixtures in relation to climate and management factors journal February 2010
Estimating Available Abandoned Cropland in the United States: Possibilities for Energy Crop Production journal April 2017
Nitrogen and harvest date affect developmental morphology and biomass yield of warm-season grasses journal August 2013
Yield Potential and Nitrogen Requirements of × on Eroded Soil journal January 2017
A Novel Framework to Classify Marginal Land for Sustainable Biomass Feedstock Production journal January 2011
The Concept of Marginal Land journal April 1932
Switchgrass production for the upper southeastern USA: Influence of cultivar and cutting frequency on biomass yields journal March 2006
Assessing multimetric aspects of sustainability: Application to a bioenergy crop production system in East Tennessee journal February 2016
Registration of ‘Shawnee‘ Switchgrass journal January 1996
Soil Properties Associated with Landscape Position journal January 1993
Management of Switchgrass-Dominated Conservation Reserve Program Lands for Biomass Production in South Dakota journal January 2006
Management of warm-season grass mixtures for biomass production in South Dakota USA journal February 2008
Stress-Tolerant Feedstocks for Sustainable Bioenergy Production on Marginal Land journal February 2015
Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands journal March 2018
Switchgrass, Big Bluestem, and Indiangrass Monocultures and Their Two- and Three-Way Mixtures for Bioenergy in the Northern Great Plains journal September 2012
Senescence, dormancy and tillering in perennial C4 grasses journal March 2014
The economics of growing shrub willow as a bioenergy buffer on agricultural fields: A case study in the Midwest Corn Belt: Shrub Willow Economics journal August 2016
In-field direct combustion fuel property changes of switchgrass harvested from summer to fall journal March 2010
Switchgrass Harvest Time Management Can Impact Biomass Yield and Nutrient Content journal January 2016
Warm-Season Grass Monocultures and Mixtures for Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production in the Midwest, USA journal November 2018
Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest journal January 2013
and Switchgrass Production in Central Illinois: Impacts on Hydrology and Inorganic Nitrogen Leaching journal January 2010
The yield and quality response of the energy grass Miscanthus × giganteus to fertiliser applications of nitrogen, potassium and sulphur journal September 2014
Biomass Production of Switchgrass in Central South Dakota journal January 2005
Frequency Grid: A Simple Tool for Measuring Grassland Establishment journal November 2001
Biomass production of herbaceous energy crops in the United States: field trial results and yield potential maps from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership journal January 2018
Estimates of Biomass Yield for Perennial Bioenergy Grasses in the USA journal November 2014
Effect of nitrogen addition on Miscanthus  ×  giganteus yield, nitrogen losses, and soil organic matter across five sites journal August 2014
Establishing and managing perennial grasses for bioenergy conference December 2013
Impact of land classification on potential warm season grass biomass production in Ontario, Canada journal March 2013
Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: The technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply report April 2005

Similar Records

Biomass Production and Nutrient Removal by Perennial Energy Grasses Produced on a Wet Marginal Land
Journal Article · Sat Jul 23 00:00:00 EDT 2022 · BioEnergy Research · OSTI ID:1559353

Near-Term Effects of Perennial Grasses on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Eastern Nebraska
Journal Article · Sat May 06 00:00:00 EDT 2023 · Environments (Online) · OSTI ID:1559353

Sun Grant/DOE Regional Feedstock Partnership: Final Technical Report
Technical Report · Thu Aug 09 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · OSTI ID:1559353

Related Subjects