skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Computer Modeling and Simulation: Increasing Reliability by Disentangling Verification and Validation

Journal Article · · Minds and Machines

Verification and validation (V&V) of computer codes and models used in simulations are two aspects of the scientific practice of high importance that recently have been discussed widely by philosophers of science. While verification is predominantly associated with the correctness of the way a model is represented by a computer code or algorithm, validation more often refers to the model’s relation to the real world and its intended use. Because complex simulations are generally opaque to a practitioner, the Duhem problem can arise with verification and validation due to their entanglement; such an entanglement makes it impossible to distinguish whether a coding error or the model’s general inadequacy to its target should be blamed in the case of a failure. I argue that a clear distinction between computer modeling and simulation has to be made to disentangle verification and validation. Drawing on that distinction, I suggest to associate modeling with verification and simulation, which shares common epistemic strategies with experimentation, with validation. To explain the reasons for their entanglement in practice, I propose a Weberian ideal–typical model of modeling and simulation as roles in practice. I examine an approach to mitigate the Duhem problem for verification and validation that is generally applicable in practice and is based on differences in epistemic strategies and scopes. Based on this analysis, I suggest two strategies to increase the reliability of simulation results, namely, avoiding alterations of verified models at the validation stage as well as performing simulations of the same target system using two or more different models. In response to Winsberg’s claim that verification and validation are entangled I argue that deploying the methodology proposed in this work it is possible to mitigate inseparability of V&V in many if not all domains where modeling and simulation are used.

Research Organization:
Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-07CH11359
OSTI ID:
1556973
Report Number(s):
FERMILAB-PUB-19-361; 1744545
Journal Information:
Minds and Machines, Vol. 29, Issue 1; ISSN 0924-6495
Publisher:
SpringerCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 2 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (14)

The philosophy of simulation: hot new issues or same old stew? journal December 2008
A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences journal September 1960
Computer Simulation: The Cooperation between Experimenting and Modeling* journal April 2007
Experiments, Simulations, and Epistemic Privilege journal October 2014
Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling journal October 2004
Computer Simulation and the Philosophy of Science journal September 2009
Computer simulations as experiments journal November 2008
Does matter really matter? Computer simulations, experiments, and materiality journal November 2008
Linguistic Privilege and Justice: What Can We Learn from STEM? journal January 2018
Models, measurement and computer simulation: the changing face of experimentation journal January 2009
How to avoid the experimenters' regress journal June 1994
Philosophy and Climate Science: by Eric B. Winsberg, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018, 282 pp., 99.99 USD (hardcover), 29.99 USD (paperback), ISBN 9781316646922 journal January 2020
Science in the Age of Computer Simulation journal July 2015
The philosophy of simulation: hot new issues or same old stew? journal June 2009