skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: On the adiabatic representation of Meyer-Miller electronic-nuclear dynamics

Journal Article · · Journal of Chemical Physics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995301· OSTI ID:1543838
 [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1]
  1. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)

The Meyer-Miller (MM) classical vibronic (electronic + nuclear) Hamiltonian for electronically non-adiabatic dynamics—as used, for example, with the recently developed symmetrical quasiclassical (SQC) windowing model—can be written in either a diabatic or an adiabatic representation of the electronic degrees of freedom, the two being a canonical transformation of each other, thus giving the same dynamics. Although most recent applications of this SQC/MM approach have been carried out in the diabatic representation—because most of the benchmark model problems that have exact quantum results available for comparison are typically defined in a diabatic representation—it will typically be much more convenient to work in the adiabatic representation, e.g., when using Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surfaces (PESs) and derivative couplings that come from electronic structure calculations. The canonical equations of motion (EOMs) (i.e., Hamilton’s equations) that come from the adiabatic MM Hamiltonian, however, in addition to the common first-derivative couplings, also involve second-derivative non-adiabatic coupling terms (as does the quantum Schrödinger equation), and the latter are considerably more difficult to calculate. This paper thus revisits the adiabatic version of the MM Hamiltonian and describes a modification of the classical adiabatic EOMs that are entirely equivalent to Hamilton’s equations but that do not involve the second-derivative couplings. The second-derivative coupling terms have not been neglected; they simply do not appear in these modified adiabatic EOMs. This means that SQC/MM calculations can be carried out in the adiabatic representation, without approximation, needing only the PESs and the first-derivative coupling elements. Here, the results of example SQC/MM calculations are presented, which illustrate this point, and also the fact that simply neglecting the second-derivative couplings in Hamilton’s equations (and presumably also in the Schrödinger equation) can cause very significant errors.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC); Univ. of California, Oakland, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES). Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1543838
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1374780
Journal Information:
Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 147, Issue 6; ISSN 0021-9606
Publisher:
American Institute of Physics (AIP)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 52 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (15)

Forward–backward solution of quantum-classical Liouville equation in the adiabatic mapping basis journal December 2013
A classical analog for electronic degrees of freedom in nonadiabatic collision processes journal April 1979
On the determination of Born–Oppenheimer nuclear motion wave functions including complications due to conical intersections and identical nuclei journal March 1979
A Symmetrical Quasi-Classical Spin-Mapping Model for the Electronic Degrees of Freedom in Non-Adiabatic Processes journal August 2015
Symmetrical windowing for quantum states in quasi-classical trajectory simulations: Application to electronically non-adiabatic processes journal December 2013
Iterative quantum-classical path integral with dynamically consistent state hopping journal January 2016
Diabolical conical intersections journal October 1996
The Symmetrical Quasi-Classical Model for Electronically Non-Adiabatic Processes Applied to Energy Transfer Dynamics in Site-Exciton Models of Light-Harvesting Complexes journal February 2016
Nonradiative Electronic Relaxation Rate Constants from Approximations Based on Linearizing the Path-Integral Forward−Backward Action journal July 2004
Symmetrical Windowing for Quantum States in Quasi-Classical Trajectory Simulations journal March 2013
A new symmetrical quasi-classical model for electronically non-adiabatic processes: Application to the case of weak non-adiabatic coupling journal October 2016
Semiclassical approximations for the calculation of thermal rate constants for chemical reactions in complex molecular systems journal June 1998
Semiclassical theory of electronically nonadiabatic dynamics: Results of a linearized approximation to the initial value representation journal November 1998
Communication: Wigner functions in action-angle variables, Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization, the Heisenberg correspondence principle, and a symmetrical quasi-classical approach to the full electronic density matrix journal August 2016
On the semiclassical description of quantum coherence in thermal rate constants journal September 1998

Cited By (10)

Combining Meyer–Miller Hamiltonian with electronic structure methods for on-the-fly nonadiabatic dynamics simulations: implementation and application journal January 2019
Initial sampling in symmetrical quasiclassical dynamics based on Li–Miller mapping Hamiltonian journal January 2019
Classical and nonclassical effects in surface hopping methodology for simulating coupled electronic-nuclear dynamics journal January 2020
The symmetrical quasi-classical approach to electronically nonadiabatic dynamics applied to ultrafast exciton migration processes in semiconducting polymers journal July 2018
Performance evaluation of the symmetrical quasi-classical dynamics method based on Meyer-Miller mapping Hamiltonian in the treatment of site-exciton models journal November 2018
A symmetrical quasi-classical windowing model for the molecular dynamics treatment of non-adiabatic processes involving many electronic states journal March 2019
A new perspective for nonadiabatic dynamics with phase space mapping models journal July 2019
Combining the mapping Hamiltonian linearized semiclassical approach with the generalized quantum master equation to simulate electronically nonadiabatic molecular dynamics journal August 2019
Performance Evaluation of the Symmetrical Quasi-Classical Dynamics Method based on Meyer-Miller Mapping Hamiltonian in the Treatment of Site-Exciton Models text January 2018
Initial Sampling in Symmetrical Quasiclassical Dynamics Based on Li-Miller Mapping Hamiltonian text January 2018