skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Flowback verses first-flush: new information on the geochemistry of produced water from mandatory reporting

Journal Article · · Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/c8em00351c· OSTI ID:1542364

Unconventional oil and gas development uses the subsurface injection of large amounts of a variety of industrial chemicals, and there are concerns about the return of these chemical to the surface with water produced with oil and gas from stimulated wells. Produced water, including any flowback of injected fluids, must be managed so as to protect human health and the environment, and understanding the chemistry of produced water from stimulated wells is necessary to ensure the safe management of produced water. In 2014, California instituted mandatory reporting for all well stimulations, including sampling produced water two times and comprehensive chemical characterization of fluids injected and fluids recovered from stimulated wells. In this study, we analyzed data from mandatory reporting with the objective of closing previously identified data gaps concerning oil-field chemical practices and the nature of flowback and produced water from stimulated wells. It was found that the plug-flow conceptual model of flowback developed in shale formations, where salinity increases over time as produced water is extracted, was not appropriate for characterizing produced water from unconventional wells in these oil reservoirs, which are predominately diatomite and sandstones. In these formations stimulation caused a "first-flush" phenomena, where salts and metals were initially high and then decreased in concentration over time, as more produced water was extracted. Although widely applied to meet regulatory requirements, total carbohydrate measurement was not found to be a good chemical indicator of hydraulic fracturing flowback. In conclusion, mandatory reporting closed data-gaps concerning chemical use, provided new information on acid treatments, and allowed more detailed analysis of hydraulic fracturing practices, including comparison of water use by geological formation.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE); USDOE Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231; IA0000018; AC02-05CH1123
OSTI ID:
1542364
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1484814
Journal Information:
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, Vol. 21, Issue 2; ISSN 2050-7887
Publisher:
Royal Society of ChemistryCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 8 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (40)

Physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of compounds used in hydraulic fracturing journal June 2014
Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil journal October 2014
Spatial and Temporal Correlation of Water Quality Parameters of Produced Waters from Devonian-Age Shale following Hydraulic Fracturing journal February 2013
Temporal analysis of flowback and produced water composition from shale oil and gas operations: Impact of frac fluid characteristics journal November 2016
Iodide, Bromide, and Ammonium in Hydraulic Fracturing and Oil and Gas Wastewaters: Environmental Implications journal January 2015
Spills of Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals on Agricultural Topsoil: Biodegradation, Sorption, and Co-contaminant Interactions journal May 2016
Identifying chemicals of concern in hydraulic fracturing fluids used for oil production journal January 2017
A Critical Review of the Risks to Water Resources from Unconventional Shale Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States journal March 2014
Unconventional oil and gas spills: Materials, volumes, and risks to surface waters in four states of the U.S. journal March 2017
Toxicity of acidization fluids used in California oil exploration journal February 2016
A systematic evaluation of chemicals in hydraulic-fracturing fluids and wastewater for reproductive and developmental toxicity journal January 2016
Evolution of water chemistry during Marcellus Shale gas development: A case study in West Virginia journal September 2015
Hydraulic fracturing chemicals reporting: Analysis of available data and recommendations for policymakers journal January 2016
Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: Implications for water treatment journal April 2015
Characterization of the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids for wells located in the Marcellus Shale Play journal September 2017
Radium and Barium Removal through Blending Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids with Acid Mine Drainage journal December 2013
The Depths of Hydraulic Fracturing and Accompanying Water Use Across the United States journal July 2015
Chemicals usage in stimulation processes for shale gas and deep geothermal systems: A comprehensive review and comparison journal September 2017
Halogenation Chemistry of Hydraulic Fracturing Additives under Highly Saline Simulated Subsurface Conditions journal July 2018
Petrophysical Evaluation of the Diatomite Formation of the Lost Hills Field, California journal October 1976
Quantitative Survey and Structural Classification of Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals Reported in Unconventional Gas Production journal March 2016
Total water-soluble sugars quantification in bio-oil using the phenol–sulfuric acid assay journal November 2013
Water Issues Related to Transitioning from Conventional to Unconventional Oil Production in the Permian Basin journal September 2017
Geochemical evaluation of flowback brine from Marcellus gas wells in Pennsylvania, USA journal January 2013
Hydraulic fracturing and the environment: risk assessment for groundwater contamination from well casing failure journal June 2016
Potential water resource impacts of hydraulic fracturing from unconventional oil production in the Bakken shale journal January 2017
Temporal characterization of flowback and produced water quality from a hydraulically fractured oil and gas well journal October 2017
Development of urban runoff model FFC-QUAL for first-flush water-quality analysis in urban drainage basins journal January 2018
Quantity of flowback and produced waters from unconventional oil and gas exploration journal January 2017
Quantifying the extent of flowback of hydraulic fracturing fluids using chemical and isotopic tracer approaches journal June 2018
Temporal dynamics of halogenated organic compounds in Marcellus Shale flowback journal June 2018
Temporal Changes in Microbial Ecology and Geochemistry in Produced Water from Hydraulically Fractured Marcellus Shale Gas Wells journal May 2014
Physical-chemical evaluation of hydraulic fracturing chemicals in the context of produced water treatment journal December 2016
Temporal characterization and statistical analysis of flowback and produced waters and their potential for reuse journal April 2018
Unconventional Oil and Gas Spills: Risks, Mitigation Priorities, and State Reporting Requirements journal February 2017
Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development journal April 2017
Toxicity of acidization fluids used in California oil exploration text January 2016
Effects of cadmium stress on physiological indexes and fruiting body nutritions of Agaricus brasiliensis journal April 2021
Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals Reporting: Analysis of Available Data and Recommendations for Policymakers journal January 2015
Toxicity of acidization fluids used in California oil exploration text January 2016