Modeling technological change and its impact on energy savings in the U.S. iron and steel sector

Karali, Nihan; Park, Won Young; McNeil, Michael

doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.173

Title: Modeling technological change and its impact on energy savings in the U.S. iron and steel sector

Journal Article · Sat Jun 03 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · Applied Energy

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.173· OSTI ID:1532214

Karali, Nihan ^[1]; Park, Won Young ^[1]; McNeil, Michael ^[1]

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)

We report market penetration of energy-efficient technologies can be estimated using energy optimization models that minimize cost; however, such models typically estimate the minimum cost of optimal pathways under a certain set of non-dynamic assumptions, so technology penetrations determined for the long-term do not fully respond to changing circumstances or costs. Here, investment costs of energy-efficient technologies are modeled dynamically in the Industrial Sector Energy-Efficiency Model (ISEEM) using a technological learning formula. Results from 24 energy-efficient technologies – 14 existing, 10 emerging – selected from the United States (U.S.) iron and steel sector show that when technological learning is incorporated into the model, total energy consumption of this sector is expected to decrease by 13% (180 PJ) in 2050 compared to energy consumption in a non-learning scenario. Average energy intensity of the steel production improves from 12.3 GJ/t in the non-learning scenario to 10.7 GJ/t in the learning scenario in 2050. This decrease represents a cost savings of US $1.6 billion and a carbon dioxide emissions reduction potential of 14.9 billion tonnes. In conclusion, results discussed in this paper focus on the U.S. iron and steel sector, but the proposed framework can be applied to study new technology development in any other industrial processes and regions.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

View Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Science (SC); Inha University; Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center of Korea

Grant/Contract Number:: AC02-05CH11231; AC02-05CH1131

OSTI ID:: 1532214

Alternate ID(s):: OSTI ID: 1416213

Journal Information:: Applied Energy, Vol. 202, Issue C; ISSN 0306-2619

Publisher:: ElsevierCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 27 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (59)

Energy Technologies Evaluated against Climate Targets Using a Cost and Carbon Trade-off Curve Trancik, Jessika E.; Cross-Call, Daniel Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1021/es304922v	journal	May 2013
Treating Progress Functions as a Managerial Opportunity Dutton, John M.; Thomas, Annie Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277639	journal	April 1984
Learning Curves in Manufacturing Argote, L.; Epple, D. Science, Vol. 247, Issue 4945 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.247.4945.920	journal	February 1990
Technological change and the timing of mitigation measures Grübler, Arnulf; Messner, Sabine Energy Economics, Vol. 20, Issue 5-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(98)00010-3	journal	December 1998
The price evolution of wind turbines in China: A study based on the modified multi-factor learning curve Yu, Yang; Li, Hong; Che, Yuyuan Renewable Energy, Vol. 103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.11.056	journal	April 2017
Technical Change Theory and Learning Curves: Patterns of Progress in Electricity Generation Technologies Jamasb, Tooraj The Energy Journal, Vol. 28, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No3-4	journal	July 2007
Endogenizing R&D and market experience in the “bottom-up” energy-systems ERIS model Barreto, Leonardo; Kypreos, Socrates Technovation, Vol. 24, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00124-4	journal	August 2004
Wind Power in Europe: A Simultaneous Innovation–Diffusion Model Söderholm, Patrik; Klaassen, Ger Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 36, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9025-z	journal	October 2006
Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: A component-learning hypothesis Ferioli, F.; Schoots, K.; van der Zwaan, B. C. C. Energy Policy, Vol. 37, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.043	journal	July 2009
When will wind energy achieve grid parity in China? – Connecting technological learning and climate finance Yao, Xilong; Liu, Yang; Qu, Shiyou Applied Energy, Vol. 160 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.094	journal	December 2015
A framework for technological learning in the supply chain: A case study on CdTe photovoltaics Bergesen, Joseph D.; Suh, Sangwon Applied Energy, Vol. 169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.013	journal	May 2016
Progress and prospect of CCS in China: Using learning curve to assess the cost-viability of a 2×600 MW retrofitted oxyfuel power plant as a case study Wu, X. D.; Yang, Q.; Chen, G. Q. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 60 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.015	journal	July 2016
Feed-in tariffs for photovoltaics: Learning by doing in Germany? Wand, Robert; Leuthold, Florian Applied Energy, Vol. 88, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.015	journal	December 2011
Modeling technological learning and its application for clean coal technologies in Japan Nakata, Toshihiko; Sato, Takemi; Wang, Hao Applied Energy, Vol. 88, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.022	journal	January 2011
Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes Wright, T. P. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 3, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.2514/8.155	journal	February 1936
The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing Arrow, Kenneth J. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952	journal	June 1962
Statistical Basis for Predicting Technological Progress Nagy, Béla; Farmer, J. Doyne; Bui, Quan M. PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052669	journal	February 2013
A dynamic process-based cost modeling approach to understand learning effects in manufacturing Nadeau, Marie-Claude; Kar, Ashish; Roth, Richard International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 128, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.016	journal	November 2010
The Relationship Between Diffusion Rates, Experience Curves, and Demand Elasticities for Consumer Durable Technological Innovations Bass, Frank M. The Journal of Business, Vol. 53, Issue S3 https://doi.org/10.1086/296099	journal	January 1980
Optimal strategies for general price-quality decision models of new products with learning production costs Teng, Jinn-Tsair; Thompson, Gerald L. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 93, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(96)00028-8	journal	September 1996
Mitigation strategies and energy technology learning: An assessment with the POLES model Criqui, P.; Mima, S.; Menanteau, P. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.005	journal	January 2015
Ethanol learning curve—the Brazilian experience Goldemberg, José; Coelho, Suani Teixeira; Nastari, Plinio Mário Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 26, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00125-9	journal	March 2004
Understanding the reductions in US corn ethanol production costs: An experience curve approach Hettinga, W. G.; Junginger, H. M.; Dekker, S. C. Energy Policy, Vol. 37, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.002	journal	January 2009
Scenario analysis for estimating the learning rate of photovoltaic power generation based on learning curve theory in South Korea Hong, Sungjun; Chung, Yanghon; Woo, Chungwon Energy, Vol. 79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.050	journal	January 2015
Technological learning in bioenergy systems Junginger, Martin; de Visser, Erika; Hjort-Gregersen, Kurt Energy Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.012	journal	December 2006
Learning rates and future cost curves for fossil fuel energy systems with CO2 capture: Methodology and case studies Li, Sheng; Zhang, Xiaosong; Gao, Lin Applied Energy, Vol. 93 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.046	journal	May 2012
Learning rates for energy technologies McDonald, Alan; Schrattenholzer, Leo Energy Policy, Vol. 29, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00122-1	journal	March 2001
Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology Neij, Lena Energy Policy, Vol. 25, Issue 13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00135-3	journal	November 1997
Experience curves for wind power Neij, Lena; Andersen, Per Dannemand; Durstewitz, Michael International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy, Vol. 2, Issue 1/2 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETP.2004.004585	journal	January 2004
Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics Nemet, Gregory F. Energy Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.020	journal	November 2006
The Diffusion of New Technologies: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry Rose, Nancy L.; Joskow, Paul L. The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.2307/2555614	journal	October 1990
Learning curves for hydrogen production technology: An assessment of observed cost reductions Schoots, K.; Ferioli, F.; Kramer, G. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 33, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.011	journal	June 2008
Prospects for PV: a learning curve analysis van der Zwaan, Bob; Rabl, Ari Solar Energy, Vol. 74, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00112-9	journal	January 2003
Incorporating experience curves in appliance standards analysis Desroches, Louis-Benoit; Garbesi, Karina; Kantner, Colleen Energy Policy, Vol. 52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.066	journal	January 2013
A review of experience curve analyses for energy demand technologies Weiss, Martin; Junginger, Martin; Patel, Martin K. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 77, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.10.009	journal	March 2010
Experience curves for power plant emission control technologies Rubin, Edward S.; Yeh, Sonia; Hounshell, David A. International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy, Vol. 2, Issue 1/2 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETP.2004.004587	journal	January 2004
Technology Innovations and Experience Curves for Nitrogen Oxides Control Technologies Yeh, Sonia; Rubin, Edward S.; Taylor, Margaret R. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 55, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2005.10464782	journal	December 2005
Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling DeCarolis, Joseph; Daly, Hannah; Dodds, Paul Applied Energy, Vol. 194 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.001	journal	May 2017
Modeling technical change in energy system analysis: analyzing the introduction of learning-by-doing in bottom-up energy models Berglund, Christer; Söderholm, Patrik Energy Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.09.002	journal	August 2006
Endogenized technological learning in an energy systems model Messner, Sabine Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 7, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001910050045	journal	September 1997
Technology evolution and energy modelling: overview of research and findings Capros, Pantelis; Vouyoukas, E. Lakis International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Issue 1/2/3/4 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2000.004041	journal	January 2000
Decarbonising road transport with hydrogen and electricity: Long term global technology learning scenarios Anandarajah, Gabrial; McDowall, Will; Ekins, Paul International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 38, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.110	journal	March 2013
Internalisation of external cost in the power generation sector: Analysis with Global Multi-regional MARKAL model Rafaj, Peter; Kypreos, Socrates Energy Policy, Vol. 35, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.003	journal	February 2007
Technological learning for carbon capture and sequestration technologies Riahi, Keywan; Rubin, Edward S.; Taylor, Margaret R. Energy Economics, Vol. 26, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.024	journal	July 2004
Multi-regional evaluation of the U.S. electricity sector under technology and policy uncertainties: Findings from MARKAL EPA9rUS modeling Balash, Peter; Nichols, Christopher; Victor, Nadejda Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 47, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2012.08.002	journal	June 2013
Riding down the experience curve for energy-efficient building envelopes: the Swiss case for 1970?2020 Jakob, Martin; Madlener, Reinhard International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy, Vol. 2, Issue 1/2 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETP.2004.004593	journal	January 2004
Reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions by energy efficiency measures and international trading: A bottom-up modeling for the U.S. iron and steel sector Karali, Nihan; Xu, Tengfang; Sathaye, Jayant Applied Energy, Vol. 120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.055	journal	May 2014
Assessing new Energy Technologies Using an Energy System Model with Endogenized Experience Curves Mattsson, Niclas; Wene, Clas-Otto International Journal of Energy Research, Vol. 21, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-114X(19970325)21:4<385::AID-ER275>3.0.CO;2-1	journal	March 1997
Modeling uncertainty of induced technological change Gritsevskyi, Andrii; Nakićenovi, Nebojša Energy Policy, Vol. 28, Issue 13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00082-3	journal	November 2000
Endogenous learning and technology clustering: analysis with MARKAL model of the Western European energy system Seebregts, Ad; Kram, Tom; Schaeffer, Gerrit Jan International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Issue 1/2/3/4 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2000.004430	journal	January 2000
Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching Kouvaritakis, Nikolaos; Soria, Antonio; Isoard, Stephane International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Issue 1/2/3/4 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2000.004384	journal	January 2000
Endogenous learning in world post-Kyoto scenarios: application of the POLES model under adaptive expectations Kouvaritakis, Nikolaos; Soria, Antonio; Isoard, Stephane International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Vol. 14, Issue 1/2/3/4 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2000.004419	journal	January 2000
The impact of learning-by-doing on the timing and costs of CO2 abatement Manne, Alan; Richels, Richard Energy Economics, Vol. 26, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.033	journal	July 2004
Analysis of Technological Portfolios for CO2 Stabilizations and Effects of Technological Changes Sano, Fuminori; Akimoto, Keigo; Homma, Takashi SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.841144	journal	January 2005
Induced Technological Change in a Limited Foresight Optimization Model Hedenus, Fredrik; Azar, Christian; Lindgren, Kristian SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.841145	journal	January 2005
Endogenous induced technical change and the costs of Kyoto Buonanno, Paolo; Carraro, Carlo; Galeotti, Marzio Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 25, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(02)00015-5	journal	February 2003
Learning-by-Doing vs. Learning by Researching in a model of climate change policy analysis Castelnuovo, Efrem; Galeotti, Marzio; Gambarelli, Gretel Ecological Economics, Vol. 54, Issue 2-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.036	journal	August 2005
Decarbonizing the Global Economy with Induced Technological Change: Scenarios to 2100 using E3MG Barker, Terry; Pan, Haoran; Kohler, Jonathan The Energy Journal, Vol. SI2006, Issue 01 https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI1-12	journal	September 2006
Endogenous Structural Change and Climate Targets Modeling Experiments with Imaclim-R Crassous, Renaud; Hourcade, Jean-Charles; Sassi, Olivier The Energy Journal, Vol. SI2006, Issue 01 https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI1-13	journal	September 2006

Similar Records

Using learning curves on energy-efficient technologies to estimate future energy savings and emission reduction potentials in the U.S. iron and steel industry

Technical Report · Thu Jun 18 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · OSTI ID:1532214

Karali, Nihan; Park, Won Young; McNeil, Michael A.

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options in ISEEM Global Energy Model: 2010-2050 Scenario Analysis for Least-Cost Carbon Reduction in Iron and Steel Sector

Technical Report · Sun Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2013 · OSTI ID:1532214

Karali, Nihan; Xu, Tengfang; Sathaye, Jayant

A Bottom-up Energy Efficiency Improvement Roadmap for China’s Iron and Steel Industry up to 2050

Technical Report · Thu Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · OSTI ID:1532214

Zhang, Qi; Hasanbeigi, Ali; Price, Lynn; +2 more

Related Subjects

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION
energy optimization models
learning curve
dynamic cost
energy-efficient technologies
endogenous technological learning

Title: Modeling technological change and its impact on energy savings in the U.S. iron and steel sector

Citation Formats

References (59)

Similar Records

Related Subjects