Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comments on “A limited-area-model case study of the effects of sub-grid scale variations in relative humidity and cloud upon the direct radiative forcing of sulfate aerosol”

Journal Article · · Geophysical Research Letters
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL50357· OSTI ID:1511457
HRD indicated that, because GCMs do not account for sub-grid scale variability in RH and its impact on water uptake and aerosol radiative properties, GCM estimates of direct radiative forcing are systematically too low. We suggest that, because water uptake is dominated by conditions that favor aerosol activation and produce cloud, the GCM estimates of direct radiative forcing may not be so far off. Direct radiative forcing within sub-grid scale clouds is likely to be negligible because so many of the aerosol particles in clouds are activated, and hence cannot contribute to direct radiative forcing (although activated aerosol material in cloud droplets still scatters sunlight, the effective radius of the cloud droplets is much larger than that of less than if the particles remained suspended aerosols).Correspondingly, however, there is the potential for indirect radiative forcing by these sub-grid scale clouds, and a GCM neglecting sub-grid scale clouds would neglect this contribution to indirect radiative forcing. The calculation of this indirect radiative forcing involves consideration of competition between natural and anthropogenic aerosol particles as cloud condensation nuclei and is beyond the scope of our comments. The reader should also consider that, because water uptake and aerosol activation are closely related processes, these conclusions depend little on the aerosol particle composition; although insoluble particles are less likely to be activated, water uptake is much less than for the more readily activated soluble particles. Thus, the conditions most likely to produce the greatest water uptake (high RH and large solubleable aerosol particles) are also those conditions most favorable for aerosol activation.
Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
NASA Mission to Planet Earth Program; USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1511457
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA--29414
Journal Information:
Geophysical Research Letters, Journal Name: Geophysical Research Letters Journal Issue: 7 Vol. 25; ISSN 0094-8276
Publisher:
American Geophysical UnionCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (3)

A parameterization of cloud droplet nucleation part I: single aerosol type journal December 1993
A limited-area-model case study of the effects of sub-grid scale Variations in relative humidity and cloud upon the direct radiative forcing of sulfate aerosol journal January 1997
The Delta-Eddington Approximation for Radiative Flux Transfer journal December 1976

Cited By (2)

Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review journal November 2000
MIRAGE: Model description and evaluation of aerosols and trace gases journal January 2004

Figures / Tables (1)


Similar Records

Evaluation of Aerosol Indirect Radiative Forcing in MIRAGE
Journal Article · Sat Mar 31 23:00:00 EST 2001 · Journal of Geophysical Research. D. (Atmospheres), 106(D6):5317-5334 · OSTI ID:15010411

Corrigendum to "Impact of cloud-borne aerosol representation on aerosol direct and indirect effects" published in Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4163-4174, 2006
Journal Article · Thu Jan 18 23:00:00 EST 2007 · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7:293-294 · OSTI ID:944775

Aerosol indirect effects ? general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data
Journal Article · Thu Mar 11 23:00:00 EST 2010 · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · OSTI ID:983326

Related Subjects