Back-contacted bottom cells with three terminals: Maximizing power extraction from current-mismatched tandem cells

Rienäcker, Michael; Warren, Emily L.; Schnabel, Manuel; Schulte‐Huxel, Henning; Niepelt, Raphael; Brendel, Rolf; Stradins, Pauls; Tamboli, Adele C.; Peibst, Robby

doi:10.1002/pip.3107

Title: Back-contacted bottom cells with three terminals: Maximizing power extraction from current-mismatched tandem cells

Journal Article · Wed Feb 06 00:00:00 EST 2019 · Progress in Photovoltaics

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3107· OSTI ID:1503161

^[1];

^[2]; Schnabel, Manuel ^[2]; Schulte‐Huxel, Henning ^[3]; Niepelt, Raphael ^[4]; Brendel, Rolf ^[1]; Stradins, Pauls ^[2]; Tamboli, Adele C. ^[2]; Peibst, Robby ^[1]

Inst. for Solar Energy Research Hamelin (ISFH), Emmerthal (Germany); Leibniz Univ. Hannover, Hannover (Germany)
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States); Inst. for Solar Energy Research Hamelin (ISFH), Emmerthal (Germany)
Institute for Solar Energy Research Hamelin (ISFH) Emmerthal Germany

Multi-junction cells can significantly improve the energy yield of photovoltaic systems over a single-junction cell. The internal interconnection scheme of the subcells is an important aspect in determining the resulting levelized cost of electricity. For a dual-junction cell, two approaches are commonly discussed: series-connected tandem cells with two terminals or independently working subcells in a four-terminal (4T) tandem device. In this paper, we explore the working principle and the operation modes of a third, rarely discussed option: a three-terminal (3T) tandem cell using a back-contacted bottom cell with 3Ts. We use current-voltage measurements of illuminated 3T interdigitated back contact cells and confirm that the front and rear base contacts are at similar quasi-Fermi level positions, which enables the bottom cell to either efficiently collect surplus carriers, in the case of a current-limiting or carrier injecting top cell, or inject majority carriers, in the case of a current-limiting bottom cell. As a result, no current matching is needed. The power output of an idealized 3T bottom cell without resistive effects is independent of the current density applied from the top cell. These characteristics of the 3T bottom cells enable a 3T tandem to operate as efficiently as a 4T tandem, while being compatible with monolithic design and not requiring intermediate grids. We propose a simple equivalent circuit model including additional resistive effects, which describes a real 3T bottom cell and achieves excellent agreement to the experiment. We deduce design guidelines for a 3T bottom cell in different operation regimes.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

View Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Solar Energy Technologies Office

Grant/Contract Number:: AC36-08GO28308; AC36‐08GO28308

OSTI ID:: 1503161

Alternate ID(s):: OSTI ID: 1493641

Report Number(s):: NREL/JA-5900-71667

Journal Information:: Progress in Photovoltaics, Vol. 27, Issue 5; ISSN 1062-7995

Publisher:: WileyCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 26 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (50)

Transparent Conductive Adhesives for Tandem Solar Cells Using Polymer–Particle Composites Klein, Talysa R.; Lee, Benjamin G.; Schnabel, Manuel ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Vol. 10, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b00175	journal	February 2018
Predicting the outdoor performance of flat-plate III–V/Si tandem solar cells Liu, Haohui; Ren, Zekun; Liu, Zhe Solar Energy, Vol. 149 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.003	journal	June 2017
High-Efficiency Monolithic Three-Terminal GaAs/Si Tandem Solar Cells Fabricated by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition Soga, Tetsuo; Yang, Mingju; Jimbo, Takashi Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 35, Issue Part 1, No. 2B https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.35.1401	journal	February 1996
Simultaneous Contacting and Interconnection of Passivated Emitter and Rear Solar Cells Schulte-Huxel, Henning; Petermann, Jan-Hendrik; Blankemeyer, Susanne Energy Procedia, Vol. 92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.135	journal	August 2016
Double-junction three-terminal photovoltaic devices: A modeling approach Emziane, M.; Nicholas, R. J. Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 102, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2786614	journal	October 2007
The detailed balance limit of perovskite/silicon and perovskite/CdTe tandem solar cells: Detailed balance limit of tandem solar cells Rühle, Sven physica status solidi (a), Vol. 214, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201600955	journal	February 2017
A comparison of different module configurations for multi-band-gap solar cells Gee, James M. Solar Cells, Vol. 24, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-6787(88)90044-0	journal	May 1988
Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26% Yoshikawa, Kunta; Kawasaki, Hayato; Yoshida, Wataru Nature Energy, Vol. 2, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.32	journal	March 2017
Planar‐Structure Perovskite Solar Cells with Efficiency beyond 21% Jiang, Qi; Chu, Zema; Wang, Pengyang Advanced Materials, Vol. 29, Issue 46 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703852	journal	October 2017
Contact Selectivity and Efficiency in Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics Brendel, Rolf; Peibst, Robby IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, Vol. 6, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2598267	journal	November 2016
The spectral p-n junction model for tandem solar-cell design Nell, M. E.; Barnett, A. M. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 34, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1987.22916	journal	February 1987
III–V-on-silicon solar cells reaching 33% photoconversion efficiency in two-terminal configuration Cariou, Romain; Benick, Jan; Feldmann, Frank Nature Energy, Vol. 3, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0125-0	journal	April 2018
27.5-percent silicon concentrator solar cells Sinton, R. A.; Gan, J. Y. IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 7, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1109/EDL.1986.26476	journal	October 1986
Perovskite Solar Cells: The Birth of a New Era in Photovoltaics Green, Martin A.; Ho-Baillie, Anita ACS Energy Letters, Vol. 2, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00137	journal	March 2017
Simulated potential for enhanced performance of mechanically stacked hybrid III–V/Si tandem photovoltaic modules using DC–DC converters MacAlpine, Sara; Bobela, David C.; Kurtz, Sarah Journal of Photonics for Energy, Vol. 7, Issue 04 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.7.042501	journal	October 2017
III- V/Si Tandem Cells Utilizing Interdigitated Back Contact Si Cells and Varying Terminal Configurations Schnabel, Manuel; Geisz, John; Schmidt, Jan 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366003	conference	June 2017
InGaAsP/InP Wavelength Division Solar Cells Ito, Nobuyuki; Uesugi, Tsutomu; Sakai, Shiro Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 20, Issue S2 https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAPS.20S2.121	journal	January 1981
A monolithic three-terminal GaInAsP/GaInAs tandem solar cell Steiner, M. A.; Wanlass, M. W.; Carapella, J. J. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 17, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.913	journal	December 2009
Low–frequency circuit theory of the double–base diode Suran, J. J. IRE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 2, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1955.14070	journal	April 1955
Current matched three-terminal dual junction GaAsP/SiGe tandem solar cell on Si Wang, Li; Conrad, Brianna; Soeriyadi, Anastasia Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 146 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.037	journal	March 2016
Spectral response and I–V measurements of tandem amorphous-silicon alloy solar cells Burdick, Joseph; Glatfelter, Troy Solar Cells, Vol. 18, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-6787(86)90129-8	journal	September 1986
High-Efficiency Polymer Tandem Solar Cells with Three-Terminal Structure Sista, Srinivas; Hong, Ziruo; Park, Mi-Hyae Advanced Materials, Vol. 22, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200902750	journal	February 2010
Detailed balance limit of the efficiency of tandem solar cells Vos, A. De Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/13/5/018	journal	May 1980
Predicting and optimising the energy yield of perovskite-on-silicon tandem solar cells under real world conditions Hörantner, Maximilian T.; Snaith, Henry J. Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 10, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE01232B	journal	January 2017
High-efficiency back-junction silicon solar cell with an in-line evaporated aluminum front grid Kessler, M.; Munster, D.; Neubert, T. 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2011.6186141	conference	June 2011
The Theory of p-n Junctions in Semiconductors and p-n Junction Transistors Shockley, W. Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 28, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb03645.x	journal	July 1949
Multilevel metallization for large area point-contact solar cells Verlinden, P.; Swanson, R. M.; Sinton, R. A. Conference Record of the Twentieth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.1988.105759	conference	January 1988
Raising the one-sun conversion efficiency of III–V/Si solar cells to 32.8% for two junctions and 35.9% for three junctions Essig, Stephanie; Allebé, Christophe; Remo, Timothy Nature Energy, Vol. 2, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.144	journal	August 2017
Field Performance versus Standard Test Condition Efficiency of Tandem Solar Cells and the Singular Case of Perovskites/Silicon Devices Dupré, Olivier; Niesen, Bjoern; De Wolf, Stefaan The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, Vol. 9, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02277	journal	January 2018
Laser contact openings for local poly-Si-metal contacts enabling 26.1%-efficient POLO-IBC solar cells Haase, Felix; Hollemann, Christina; Schäfer, Sören Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 186 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.020	journal	November 2018
Measurement techniques for multijunction solar cells Virshup, G. F. IEEE Conference on Photovoltaic Specialists https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.1990.111814	conference	January 1990
Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 53) Green, Martin A.; Hishikawa, Yoshihiro; Dunlop, Ewan D. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 27, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3102	journal	December 2018
Three-terminal heterojunction bipolar transistor solar cell for high-efficiency photovoltaic conversion Martí, A.; Luque, A. Nature Communications, Vol. 6, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7902	journal	April 2015
Limiting efficiency for current-constrained two-terminal tandem cell stacks Brown, Andrew S.; Green, Martin A. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 10, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.425	journal	January 2002
Junction Resistivity of Carrier-Selective Polysilicon on Oxide Junctions and Its Impact on Solar Cell Performance Rienacker, Michael; Bossmeyer, Marcel; Merkle, Agnes IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, Vol. 7, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2614123	journal	January 2017
New method of parameters extraction from dark I-V curve Kaminski, A.; Marchand, J. J.; Fave, A. Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997 https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.1997.654064	conference	January 1997
Three terminal Si-Si:Ge solar cells Wang, Lu; Wang, Yi; Gerger, Andrew 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2011.6185901	conference	June 2011
Recombination Behavior of Photolithography-free Back Junction Back Contact Solar Cells with Carrier-selective Polysilicon on Oxide Junctions for Both Polarities Rienäcker, Michael; Merkle, Agnes; Römer, Udo Energy Procedia, Vol. 92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.121	journal	August 2016
Theoretical analysis of new wavelength‐division solar cells Sakai, S.; Umeno, M. Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 51, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328382	journal	September 1980
Equivalent Performance in Three-Terminal and Four-Terminal Tandem Solar Cells Schnabel, Manuel; Rienacker, Michael; Warren, Emily L. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, Vol. 8, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2865175	journal	November 2018
Maximizing tandem solar cell power extraction using a three-terminal design Warren, Emily L.; Deceglie, Michael G.; Rienäcker, Michael Sustainable Energy & Fuels, Vol. 2, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SE00133B	journal	January 2018
Tabulated values of the Shockley–Queisser limit for single junction solar cells Rühle, Sven Solar Energy, Vol. 130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.015	journal	June 2016
Application of the superposition principle to solar-cell analysis Lindholm, F. A.; Fossum, J. G.; Burgess, E. L. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 26, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1979.19400	journal	March 1979
Yield analysis and comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs multi-terminal tandem solar cells Schulte-Huxel, Henning; Silverman, Timothy J.; Friedman, Daniel J. SILICONPV 2018, THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CRYSTALLINE SILICON PHOTOVOLTAICS, AIP Conference Proceedings https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5049319	conference	January 2018
Energy Yield Analysis of Multiterminal Si-Based Tandem Solar Cells Schulte-Huxel, Henning; Silverman, Timothy J.; Deceglie, Michael G. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, Vol. 8, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2846520	journal	September 2018
Three-terminal III–V/Si tandem solar cells enabled by a transparent conductive adhesive Schnabel, Manuel; Schulte-Huxel, Henning; Rienäcker, Michael Sustainable Energy & Fuels https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00893D	journal	January 2020
Modeling three-terminal III- V lSi tandem solar cells Warren, Emily L.; Deceglie, Michael G.; Stradins, Paul 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366543	conference	June 2017
Silicon solar cells with total area efficiency above 25 % Smith, David D.; Reich, Gerly; Baldrias, Maristel 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2016.7750287	conference	June 2016
Simultaneous Contacting and Interconnection of Passivated Emitter and Rear Solar Cells Schulte-Huxel, Henning; Petermann, Jan-Hendrik; Blankemeyer, Susanne London : Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.15488/1203	other	January 2016
Recombination Behavior of Photolithography-free Back Junction Back Contact Solar Cells with Carrier-selective Polysilicon on Oxide Junctions for Both Polarities Rienäcker, Michael; Merkle, Agnes; Römer, Udo London : Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.15488/1193	other	January 2016

Similar Records

Hybrid Tandem Photovoltaics

Technical Report · Wed Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2023 · OSTI ID:1503161

Warren, Emily; Geisz, John; Buencuerpo, Jeronimo; +9 more

Yield Analysis and Comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs Multi-Terminal Tandem Solar Cells

Conference · Fri Aug 10 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · OSTI ID:1503161

Tamboli, Adele C; Schulte-Huxel, Henning; Silverman, Timothy J; +9 more

26.7% Efficient 4-Terminal Perovskite–Silicon Tandem Solar Cell Composed of a High-Performance Semitransparent Perovskite Cell and a Doped Poly-Si/SiO_x Passivating Contact Silicon Cell

Journal Article · Thu Jan 16 00:00:00 EST 2020 · IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics · OSTI ID:1503161

Rohatgi, Ajeet; Zhu, Kai; Tong, Jinhui; +5 more

Related Subjects

14 SOLAR ENERGY
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE
3T
bipolar junction transistor tandem bottom cell
current-mismatch
interdigitated back contact cell (IBC)
tandem solar cell
three terminal

Title: Back-contacted bottom cells with three terminals: Maximizing power extraction from current-mismatched tandem cells

Citation Formats

References (50)

Similar Records

Related Subjects