skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Cycle-to-Cycle Variations in Multi-Cycle Engine RANS Simulations

Abstract

Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) modeling is expected to deliver an ensemble-averaged result for the majority of turbulent flows. This could lead to the conclusion that multi-cycle internal combustion engine (ICE) simulations performed using RANS must exhibit a converging numerical solution after a certain number of consecutive cycles. However, for some engine configurations unsteady RANS simulations are not guaranteed to deliver an ensemble-averaged result. In this paper it is shown that, when using RANS modeling to simulate multiple engine cycles, the cycle-to-cycle variations (CCV) generated from different initial conditions at each cycle are not damped out even after a large number of cycles. A single-cylinder GDI research engine is simulated using RANS modeling and the numerical results for 20 consecutive engine cycles are evaluated for two specific operating conditions. One condition is characterized by stoichiometric operation and stable combustion (COVIMEP < 2%) and the other features dilute combustion resulting in misfire events and much higher COVIMEP. In both cases, multi-cycle RANS simulation results show cyclic variability. An in-depth analysis of the most significant physical and chemical quantities highlights that CCV are caused primarily by the variability of the in-cylinder flow. For stoichiometric combustion this does not greatly affect flame propagation, and themore » resulting fluctuations of the pressure traces are narrow. However, in the event of dilute combustion, the variability of the flow gains more importance, therefore delivering large cyclic fluctuations of in-cylinder pressure. Even though unsteady RANS simulations are not expected to predict as much variability in engine flows as LES, in particular for stable cases, they can still be used to capture typical combustion stability features in an internal combustion engine. This paper shows that the occurrence of CCV when using multi-cycle RANS modeling is not a numerical artifact or the effect of changes in the computational grid from cycle to cycle. Cold-flow analysis reveals that the variability of the simulated flow is intrinsic for the unsteady RANS approach and can only be damped out by increasing numerical viscosity, either by increasing the cell size or by adding up-winding. This is proved in a simplified non-ICE case such as the simulation of the vortex shredding from a cylinder in cross flow. Also, the effect of numerical viscosity on CCV is shown for multi-cycle engine simulations by using a simplified combustion model. Finally, it is shown that multi-cycle RANS can successfully predict the effect of changing specific engine parameters, such as the properties of the ignition system, on cyclic variability and combustion stability.« less

Authors:
; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) - Office of Vehicle Technology
OSTI Identifier:
1502847
DOE Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: 2016 SAE World Congress , 04/12/16 - 04/14/16, Detroit, MI, US
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Scarcelli, Riccardo, Richards, Keith, Pomraning, Eric, Senecal, Peter K., Sevik, James M, and Wallner, Thomas. Cycle-to-Cycle Variations in Multi-Cycle Engine RANS Simulations. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.4271/2016-01-0593.
Scarcelli, Riccardo, Richards, Keith, Pomraning, Eric, Senecal, Peter K., Sevik, James M, & Wallner, Thomas. Cycle-to-Cycle Variations in Multi-Cycle Engine RANS Simulations. United States. doi:10.4271/2016-01-0593.
Scarcelli, Riccardo, Richards, Keith, Pomraning, Eric, Senecal, Peter K., Sevik, James M, and Wallner, Thomas. Fri . "Cycle-to-Cycle Variations in Multi-Cycle Engine RANS Simulations". United States. doi:10.4271/2016-01-0593. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1502847.
@article{osti_1502847,
title = {Cycle-to-Cycle Variations in Multi-Cycle Engine RANS Simulations},
author = {Scarcelli, Riccardo and Richards, Keith and Pomraning, Eric and Senecal, Peter K. and Sevik, James M and Wallner, Thomas},
abstractNote = {Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) modeling is expected to deliver an ensemble-averaged result for the majority of turbulent flows. This could lead to the conclusion that multi-cycle internal combustion engine (ICE) simulations performed using RANS must exhibit a converging numerical solution after a certain number of consecutive cycles. However, for some engine configurations unsteady RANS simulations are not guaranteed to deliver an ensemble-averaged result. In this paper it is shown that, when using RANS modeling to simulate multiple engine cycles, the cycle-to-cycle variations (CCV) generated from different initial conditions at each cycle are not damped out even after a large number of cycles. A single-cylinder GDI research engine is simulated using RANS modeling and the numerical results for 20 consecutive engine cycles are evaluated for two specific operating conditions. One condition is characterized by stoichiometric operation and stable combustion (COVIMEP < 2%) and the other features dilute combustion resulting in misfire events and much higher COVIMEP. In both cases, multi-cycle RANS simulation results show cyclic variability. An in-depth analysis of the most significant physical and chemical quantities highlights that CCV are caused primarily by the variability of the in-cylinder flow. For stoichiometric combustion this does not greatly affect flame propagation, and the resulting fluctuations of the pressure traces are narrow. However, in the event of dilute combustion, the variability of the flow gains more importance, therefore delivering large cyclic fluctuations of in-cylinder pressure. Even though unsteady RANS simulations are not expected to predict as much variability in engine flows as LES, in particular for stable cases, they can still be used to capture typical combustion stability features in an internal combustion engine. This paper shows that the occurrence of CCV when using multi-cycle RANS modeling is not a numerical artifact or the effect of changes in the computational grid from cycle to cycle. Cold-flow analysis reveals that the variability of the simulated flow is intrinsic for the unsteady RANS approach and can only be damped out by increasing numerical viscosity, either by increasing the cell size or by adding up-winding. This is proved in a simplified non-ICE case such as the simulation of the vortex shredding from a cylinder in cross flow. Also, the effect of numerical viscosity on CCV is shown for multi-cycle engine simulations by using a simplified combustion model. Finally, it is shown that multi-cycle RANS can successfully predict the effect of changing specific engine parameters, such as the properties of the ignition system, on cyclic variability and combustion stability.},
doi = {10.4271/2016-01-0593},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {4}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share: