Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Seismicity Rate Surge on Faults after Shut–in: Poroelastic Response to Fluid Injection

Journal Article · · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180054· OSTI ID:1465191
 [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)

Injection of large amounts of fluid into the subsurface alters the states of pore pressure and stress in the formation, potentially inducing earthquakes. Increase in the seismicity rate after shut–in is often observed at fluid–injection operation sites, but mechanistic study of the rate surge has not been investigated thoroughly. Considering full poroelastic coupling of pore pressure and stress, the earthquake occurrence after shut–in can be driven by two mechanisms: (1) post shut–in diffusion of pore pressure into distant faults and (2) poroelastic stressing caused by fluid injection. Interactions of these mechanisms can depend on fault geometry, hydraulic and mechanical properties of the formation, and injection operation. In this work, a 2D aerial view of the target reservoir intersected by strike–slip basement faults is used to evaluate the impact of injection–induced pressure buildup on seismicity rate surge. A series of sensitivity tests are performed by considering the variation in (1) permeability of the fault zone, (2) locations and the number of faults with respect to the injector, and (3) well operations with time–dependent injection rates. Lower permeability faults have higher seismicity rates than more permeable faults after shut–in due to delayed diffusion and poroelastic stressing. Hydraulic barriers, depending on their relative location to injection, can either stabilize or weaken a conductive fault via poroelastic stresses. In conclusion, gradual reduction of the injection rate minimizes the coulomb stress change and the least seismicity rates are predicted due to slower relaxation of coupling–induced compression as well as pore–pressure dissipation.

Research Organization:
Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) (United States). Center for Frontiers of Subsurface Energy Security (CFSES); Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
OSTI ID:
1465191
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1485512
Report Number(s):
SAND--2018-4360J; 663908
Journal Information:
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Journal Name: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 108; ISSN 0037-1106
Publisher:
Seismological Society of AmericaCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Cited By (4)

3-D Modeling of Induced Seismicity Along Multiple Faults: Magnitude, Rate, and Location in a Poroelasticity System journal November 2018
Hydraulic Fracture Injection Strategy Influences the Probability of Earthquakes in the Eagle Ford Shale Play of South Texas journal November 2019
Effect of the Injection Scenario on the Rate and Magnitude Content of Injection‐Induced Seismicity: Case of a Heterogeneous Fault journal August 2019
Fault “Corrosion” by Fluid Injection: A Potential Cause of the November 2017 M W 5.5 Korean Earthquake journal July 2019

Similar Records

3-D Modeling of Induced Seismicity Along Multiple Faults: Magnitude, Rate, and Location in a Poroelasticity System
Journal Article · Tue Oct 23 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth · OSTI ID:1485461

Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma
Journal Article · Mon Jul 29 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · OSTI ID:1545640

Related Subjects