skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Direct Methane to Methanol: The Selectivity–Conversion Limit and Design Strategies

Journal Article · · ACS Catalysis
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [2]
  1. SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, California 94305, United States
  2. SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, California 94305, United States, SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States

Currently, methane is transformed into methanol through the two-step syngas process, which requires high temperatures and centralized production. While the slightly exothermic direct partial oxidation of methane to methanol would be preferable, no such process has been established despite over a century of research. Generally, this failure has been attributed to both the high barriers required to activate methane as well as the higher activity of the CH bonds in methanol compared to those in methane. However, a precise and general quantification of the limitations of catalytic direct methane to methanol has yet to be established. Herein, we present a simple kinetic model to explain the selectivity–conversion trade-off that hampers continuous partial oxidation of methane to methanol. For the same kinetic model, we apply two distinct methods, using ab initio calculations and fitting to a large experimental database, to fully define the model parameters. We find that both methods yield strikingly similar results, namely, that the selectivity of methane to methanol in a direct, continuous process can be fully described by the methane conversion, the temperature, and a catalyst-independent difference in methane and methanol activation free energies, ΔGa, which is dictated by the relative reactivity of the C–H bonds in methane and methanol. Stemming from this analysis, we suggest several design strategies for increasing methanol yields under the constraint of constant ΔGa. These strategies include “collectors”, materials with strong methanol adsorption potential that can help to lower the partial pressure of methanol in the gas phase, aqueous reaction conditions, and/or diffusion-limited systems. Here, by using this simple model to successfully rationalize a representative library of experimental studies from the diverse fields of heterogeneous, homogeneous, biological, and gas-phase methane to methanol catalysis, we underscore the idea that continuous methane to methanol is generally limited and provide a framework for understanding and evaluating new catalysts and processes.

Research Organization:
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
Grant/Contract Number:
32 CFR 168a; AC02-76SF00515
OSTI ID:
1460114
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1459595
Journal Information:
ACS Catalysis, Journal Name: ACS Catalysis Vol. 8 Journal Issue: 8; ISSN 2155-5435
Publisher:
American Chemical SocietyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 139 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Cited By (18)

Quasicatalytic and catalytic selective oxidation of methane to methanol over solid materials: a review on the roles of water journal October 2019
Thermodynamic Limitations of the Catalyst Design Space for Methanol Production from Methane journal October 2018
The Nature and Catalytic Function of Cation Sites in Zeolites: a Computational Perspective journal October 2018
Methane Activation and Utilization: Current Status and Future Challenges journal December 2019
The special route toward conversion of methane to methanol on a fluffy metal‐free carbon nitride photocatalyst in the presence of H 2 O 2 journal December 2019
Misconceptions and challenges in methane-to-methanol over transition-metal-exchanged zeolites journal May 2019
Methane selective oxidation to methanol by metal-exchanged zeolites: a review of active sites and their reactivity journal January 2019
Oriented external electric fields as mimics for probing the role of metal ions and ligands in the thermal gas-phase activation of methane journal January 2018
A renaissance of ligand-to-metal charge transfer by cerium photocatalysis journal January 2018
Origins of complex solvent effects on chemical reactivity and computational tools to investigate them: a review journal January 2019
Comparative performance of Cu-zeolites in the isothermal conversion of methane to methanol journal January 2019
Kinetic study and effect of water on methane oxidation to methanol over copper-exchanged mordenite journal January 2020
Direct conversion of methane to methanol with zeolites: towards understanding the role of extra-framework d-block metal and zeolite framework type journal January 2019
Chemical looping beyond combustion – a perspective journal January 2020
The effect of oxidant species on direct, non-syngas conversion of methane to methanol over an FePO 4 catalyst material journal January 2019
Catalyst screening for the oxidative coupling of methane: from isothermal to adiabatic operation via microkinetic simulations journal January 2020
Mo 6 S 8 -based single-metal-atom catalysts for direct methane to methanol conversion journal July 2019
Partial oxidation of methane to methanol by isolated Pt catalyst supported on a CeO 2 nanoparticle journal February 2020