skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Life‐cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co‐production of biofuels and bio‐based chemicals: co‐product handling methods and implications

Journal Article · · Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1893· OSTI ID:1441227
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [2];  [2]
  1. Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory USA
  2. National Bioenergy Center National Renewable Energy Laboratory IL USA

Abstract New integrated biorefinery (IBR) concepts are being investigated to co‐produce hydrocarbon fuels and high‐value bio‐based chemicals to improve the economic viability of IBRs, to enhance biomass resource utilization efficiencies, and to maximize potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. Unlike fuel‐only biorefineries, IBRs may co‐produce a significant amount of bio‐based chemicals, whose emission implications for specific biorefinery products and the biorefinery as a whole need to be evaluated. We discuss this in principle and apply three sets of co‐product handling methods to conduct life‐cycle analysis (LCA) of modeled IBRs with co‐production of two bioproduct examples – succinic acid and adipic acid – alongside a renewable diesel blendstock fuel product. The LCA results for the specific co‐product handling methods that were examined shed light on potential artifacts of product‐specific LCA with selected co‐product methods. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each method and conclude that (i) a system‐level or ‘black‐box’ LCA allocation method is too simplistic to reflect appropriately the GHG burdens of distinctly different processing trains for fuels and chemicals in the IBR context, and (ii) the displacement method is the only co‐product handling method that accounts fully for the emission effects of both the fuel product and the non‐fuel bio‐based co‐products in the IBRs within the context of the existing fuel‐focused GHG regulatory framework. Alternatively, biorefinery system‐level LCA combines benefits of individual products to offer a complete picture. This system‐level LCA approach offers a holistic LCA without somewhat arbitrary decisions either on an allocation basis or by the selection of an evaluation metric based on specific products. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1441227
Journal Information:
Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, Journal Name: Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining Vol. 12 Journal Issue: 5; ISSN 1932-104X
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 36 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (25)

Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States journal January 2013
Policy Implications of Allocation Methods in the Life Cycle Analysis of Integrated Corn and Corn Stover Ethanol Production journal August 2015
Production pathways for renewable jet fuel: a review of commercialization status and future prospects: Renewable jet fuel technologies: commercialisation status and future prospects journal April 2016
Bioreactors for lignocellulose conversion into fermentable sugars for production of high added value products journal November 2015
Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use journal December 2012
An assessment of the potential products and economic and environmental impacts resulting from a billion ton bioeconomy journal November 2016
The Catalytic Valorization of Lignin for the Production of Renewable Chemicals journal June 2010
Cellulosic ethanol: status and innovation journal June 2017
Biological production of adipic acid from renewable substrates: Current and future methods journal January 2016
Carbon recovery from wastewater through bioconversion into biodegradable polymers journal July 2017
Succinic acid from renewable resources as a C 4 building-block chemical—a review of the catalytic possibilities in aqueous media journal January 2009
Bio-oil based biorefinery strategy for the production of succinic acid journal January 2013
Review of US and EU initiatives toward development, demonstration, and commercialization of lignocellulosic biofuels journal August 2013
Life cycle environmental sustainability of lignocellulosic ethanol produced in integrated thermo-chemical biorefineries journal April 2015
Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context journal October 2011
Process Design and Economics for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Hydrocarbons: Dilute-Acid and Enzymatic Deconstruction of Biomass to Sugars and Catalytic Conversion of Sugars to Hydrocarbons report March 2015
Life-cycle analysis of bio-based aviation fuels journal December 2013
A review of current technology for biodiesel production: State of the art journal February 2014
Allocation in lca of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9 part i. methodology journal September 2002
Chemicals from Biomass: A Market Assessment of Bioproducts with Near-Term Potential report March 2016
The Techno-Economic Basis for Coproduct Manufacturing To Enable Hydrocarbon Fuel Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass journal May 2016
Identification and thermochemical analysis of high-lignin feedstocks for biofuel and biochemical production journal January 2011
Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Petroleum Products at U.S. Refineries journal June 2014
Environmental Impacts of Wild Caught Cod and Farmed Salmon - A Comparison with Chicken (7 pp) journal January 2006
Life Cycle Carbon Footprint of Ethanol and Potassium Acetate Produced from a Forest Product Wastewater Stream by a Co-Located Biorefinery journal July 2014