Perennial rhizomatous grasses as bioenergy feedstock in SWAT: parameter development and model improvement

Trybula, Elizabeth M.; Cibin, Raj; Burks, Jennifer L.; Chaubey, Indrajeet; Brouder, Sylvie M.; Volenec, Jeffrey J.

doi:10.1111/gcbb.12210

Title: Perennial rhizomatous grasses as bioenergy feedstock in SWAT: parameter development and model improvement

Journal Article · Fri Jun 13 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · Global Change Biology. Bioenergy

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12210· OSTI ID:1437637

Trybula, Elizabeth M. ^[1]; Cibin, Raj ^[2]; Burks, Jennifer L. ^[3]; Chaubey, Indrajeet ^[4]; Brouder, Sylvie M. ^[3]; Volenec, Jeffrey J. ^[3]

Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (United States). Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. Dept. of Agronomy
Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (United States). Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (United States). Dept. of Agronomy
Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (United States). Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is increasingly used to quantify hydrologic and water quality impacts of bioenergy production, but crop-growth parameters for candidate perennial rhizomatous grasses (PRG) Miscanthus × giganteus and upland ecotypes of Panicum virgatum (switchgrass) are limited by the availability of field data. Crop-growth parameter ranges and suggested values were developed in this study using agronomic and weather data collected at the Purdue University Water Quality Field Station in northwestern Indiana. During the process of parameterization, the comparison of measured data with conceptual representation of PRG growth in the model led to three changes in the SWAT 2009 code: the harvest algorithm was modified to maintain belowground biomass over winter, plant respiration was extended via modified-DLAI to better reflect maturity and leaf senescence, and nutrient uptake algorithms were revised to respond to temperature, water, and nutrient stress. Parameter values and changes to the model resulted in simulated biomass yield and leaf area index consistent with reported values for the region. Code changes in the SWAT model improved nutrient storage during dormancy period and nitrogen and phosphorus uptake by both switchgrass and Miscanthus.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

View Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Sustainable Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO); USDA National Inst. of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)

Grant/Contract Number:: EE0004396; 2011-68005-30411

OSTI ID:: 1437637

Alternate ID(s):: OSTI ID: 1400445

Journal Information:: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 6; ISSN 1757-1693

Publisher:: WileyCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 56 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (41)

Modeling Miscanthus in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to Simulate Its Water Quality Effects As a Bioenergy Crop Ng, Tze Ling; Eheart, J. Wayland; Cai, Ximing Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.1021/es9039677	journal	September 2010
Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus x giganteus: Conclusions from a review of published studies Cadoux, Stéphane; Riche, Andrew B.; Yates, Nicola E. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 38 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.015	journal	March 2012
A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters Murphy, J.; Riley, J. P. Analytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 27 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5	journal	January 1962
Large area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment part i: Model Development Arnold, J. G.; Srinivasan, R.; Muttiah, R. S. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 34, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x	journal	February 1998
Empirical geographic modeling of switchgrass yields in the United States: EMPIRICAL SWITCHGRASS MODELING Jager, Henriette I.; Baskaran, Latha M.; Brandt, Craig C. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 2, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01059.x	journal	September 2010
Simulated impact of future biofuel production on water quality and water cycle dynamics in the Upper Mississippi river basin Wu, May; Demissie, Yonas; Yan, Eugene Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.030	journal	June 2012
Biomass production and nitrogen accumulation and remobilisation by Miscanthus×giganteus as influenced by nitrogen stocks in belowground organs Strullu, L.; Cadoux, S.; Preudhomme, M. Field Crops Research, Vol. 121, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.005	journal	April 2011
Ceptometer Deployment Method Affects Measurement of Fraction of Intercepted Photosynthetically Active Radiation Johnson, Mari-Vaughn V.; Kiniry, James R.; Burson, Byron L. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 102, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0478	journal	January 2010
Comment on “Modeling Miscanthus in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to Simulate Its Water Quality Effects As a Bioenergy Crop” Zhang, Xuesong; Izaurralde, R. César; Arnold, Jeffrey G. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.1021/es201463x	journal	July 2011
Cold Tolerance of C ₄ photosynthesis in Miscanthus × giganteus : Adaptation in Amounts and Sequence of C ₄ Photosynthetic Enzymes Naidu, Shawna L.; Moose, Stephen P.; AL-Shoaibi, Abdul K. Plant Physiology, Vol. 132, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.021790	journal	June 2003
Water quality impact assessment of large-scale biofuel crops expansion in agricultural regions of Michigan Love, Bradley J.; Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 35, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.041	journal	May 2011
More Productive Than Maize in the Midwest: How Does Miscanthus Do It? Dohleman, Frank G.; Long, Stephen P. Plant Physiology, Vol. 150, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.139162	journal	June 2009
Seasonal dynamics of nutrient accumulation and partitioning in the perennial C4-grasses Miscanthus × giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides Beale, C. V.; Long, S. P. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 12, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00016-0	journal	January 1997
Nitrogen partitioning and utilization in corn cropping systems: Rotation, N source, and N timing Hernandez-Ramirez, Guillermo; Brouder, Sylvie M.; Smith, Douglas R. European Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 34, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.12.002	journal	April 2011
Application of a Multi-Objective Optimization Method to Provide Least Cost Alternatives for NPS Pollution Control Maringanti, Chetan; Chaubey, Indrajeet; Arabi, Mazdak Environmental Management, Vol. 48, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9696-2	journal	June 2011
The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe Lewandowski, Iris; Scurlock, Jonathan M. O.; Lindvall, Eva Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 25, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00030-8	journal	October 2003
Registration of ‘Shawnee‘ Switchgrass Vogel, K. P.; Hopkins, A. A.; Moore, K. J. Crop Science, Vol. 36, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600060051x	journal	January 1996
A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water Heaton, E. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 27, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.10.005	journal	July 2004
Temperature Effects on Germination of Perennial Warm-Season Forage Grasses1 Hsu, F. H.; Nelson, C. J.; Matches, A. G. Crop Science, Vol. 25, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500020005x	journal	January 1985
Clash of the Titans: Comparing Productivity Via Radiation Use Efficiency for Two Grass Giants of the Biofuel Field Kiniry, James Robert; Johnson, Mari-Vaughn V.; Bruckerhoff, Steve B. BioEnergy Research, Vol. 5, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-011-9116-8	journal	February 2011
Biomass Production in Switchgrass across the United States: Database Description and Determinants of Yield Wullschleger, S. D.; Davis, E. B.; Borsuk, M. E. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 102, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0087	journal	January 2010
Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus , a major energy crop. A review Zub, H. W.; Brancourt-Hulmel, M. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 30, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009034	journal	April 2010
Biofuels and water quality: challenges and opportunities for simulation modeling Engel, Bernard; Chaubey, Indrajeet; Thomas, Mark Biofuels, Vol. 1, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.17	journal	May 2010
Plant growth simulation for landscape-scale hydrological modelling Kiniry, J. R.; Macdonald, J. D.; Kemanian, Armen R. Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 53, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.5.1030	journal	October 2008
Root Production and the Estimation of net Productivity Bray, J. R. Canadian Journal of Botany, Vol. 41, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1139/b63-007	journal	January 1963
Switchgrass Biomass Simulation at Diverse Sites in the Northern Great Plains of the U.S. Kiniry, J. R.; Schmer, M. R.; Vogel, K. P. BioEnergy Research, Vol. 1, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9024-8	journal	December 2008
Miscanthus: A Promising Biomass Crop Heaton, Emily A.; Dohleman, Frank G.; Miguez, A. Fernando Advances in Botanical Research https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381518-7.00003-0	book	January 2010
Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus Heaton, Emily A.; Dohleman, Frank G.; Long, Stephen P. Global Change Biology, Vol. 14, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01662.x	journal	September 2008
Leaf photosynthesis in the C ₄ -grass Miscanthus x giganteus , growing in the cool temperate climate of southern England Beale, C. V.; Bint, D. A.; Long, S. P. Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 47, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.2.267	journal	January 1996
Simulating Alamo Switchgrass with the ALMANAC Model Kiniry, James R.; Sanderson, Matt A.; Williams, Jimmy R. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 88, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040018x	journal	January 1996
Simulated watershed scale impacts of corn stover removal for biofuel on hydrology and water quality: WATERSHED SCALE IMPACTS OF CORN STOVER REMOVAL Cibin, R.; Chaubey, I.; Engel, B. Hydrological Processes, Vol. 26, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8280	journal	September 2011
Modeling spatial and dynamic variation in growth, yield, and yield stability of the bioenergy crops Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across the conterminous United States Miguez, Fernando E.; Maughan, Matthew; Bollero, Germán A. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 4, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01150.x	journal	December 2011
Seasonal dynamics of above- and below-ground biomass and nitrogen partitioning in Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across three growing seasons Dohleman, Frank G.; Heaton, Emily A.; Arundale, Rebecca A. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 4, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01153.x	journal	January 2012
The New Gold Rush: Fueling Ethanol Production while Protecting Water Quality Simpson, Thomas W.; Sharpley, Andrew N.; Howarth, Robert W. Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 37, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0599	journal	January 2008
History of model development at Temple, Texas Williams, J. R.; Arnold, J. G.; Kiniry, J. R. Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 53, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.5.948	journal	October 2008
Quality and decomposition in soil of rhizome, root and senescent leaf from Miscanthus x giganteus, as affected by harvest date and N fertilization Amougou, Norbert; Bertrand, Isabelle; Machet, Jean-Marie Plant and Soil, Vol. 338, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0443-x	journal	June 2010
Radiation use efficiency and leaf CO2 exchange for diverse C4 grasses Kiniry, J. R.; Tischler, C. R.; Van Esbroeck, G. A. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 17, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00036-7	journal	August 1999
Impacts of biofuels production alternatives on water quantity and quality in the Iowa River Basin Wu, Yiping; Liu, Shuguang Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.030	journal	January 2012
A role for nitrogen reserves in forage regrowth and stress tolerance Volenec, J. J.; Ourry, A.; Joern, B. C. Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 97, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00496.x	journal	May 1996
A semimechanistic model predicting the growth and production of the bioenergy crop Miscanthus × giganteus: description, parameterization and validation Miguez, Fernando E.; Zhu, Xinguang; Humphries, Stephen GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 1, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01019.x	journal	August 2009
The Biology and Agronomy of Switchgrass for Biofuels Parrish, David J.; Fike, John H. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, Vol. 24, Issue 5-6 https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680500316433	journal	September 2005

Cited By (7)

Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) simulated hydrological impacts of land use change from temperate grassland to energy crops: A case study in western UK Holder, Amanda J.; Rowe, Rebecca; McNamara, Niall P. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 11, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12628	journal	June 2019
Valuation of ecosystem services in alternative bioenergy landscape scenarios Mishra, Shruti K.; Negri, Maria Cristina; Kozak, Justin GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 11, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12602	journal	March 2019
A Race Against Time: Modeling Time Lags in Watershed Response Ilampooranan, Idhayachandhiran; Van Meter, K. J.; Basu, Nandita B. Water Resources Research, Vol. 55, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023815	journal	May 2019
Perennial biomass production from marginal land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Feng, Qingyu; Chaubey, Indrajeet; Cibin, Raj Land Degradation & Development, Vol. 29, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2971	journal	May 2018
Description and Codification of Miscanthus × giganteus Growth Stages for Phenological Assessment Tejera, Mauricio D.; Heaton, Emily A. Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01726	journal	October 2017
Synthesizing models useful for ecohydrology and ecohydraulic approaches: An emphasis on integrating models to address complex research questions: synthesis of models with an emphasis on integration Brewer, Shannon K.; Worthington, Thomas A.; Mollenhauer, Robert Ecohydrology, Vol. 11, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1966	journal	April 2018
Hydrologic and water quality responses to biomass production in the Tennessee river basin Wang, Gangsheng; Jager, Henriette I.; Baskaran, Latha M. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12537	journal	August 2018

Similar Records

Watershed‐scale impacts of bioenergy crops on hydrology and water quality using improved SWAT model

Journal Article · Fri Jan 08 00:00:00 EST 2016 · Global Change Biology. Bioenergy · OSTI ID:1437637

Cibin, Raj; Trybula, Elizabeth; Chaubey, Indrajeet; +2 more

Simulating Establishment Periods of Switchgrass and Miscanthus in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)

Journal Article · Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2017 · Transactions of the ASABE (Online) · OSTI ID:1437637

Feng, Qingyu; Chaubey, Indrajeet; Cibin, Raj; +3 more

Perennial biomass production from marginal land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin

Journal Article · Wed May 16 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · Land Degradation and Development · OSTI ID:1437637

Feng, Qingyu; Chaubey, Indrajeet; Cibin, Raj; +4 more

Related Subjects

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
bioenergy feedstock
hydrologic model
Miscanthus
model parameterization
perennial rhizomatous grass
soil and water assessment tool
switchgrass

Title: Perennial rhizomatous grasses as bioenergy feedstock in SWAT: parameter development and model improvement

Citation Formats

References (41)

Cited By (7)

Similar Records

Related Subjects