Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Assessment of Different Discrete Particle Methods Ability To Predict Gas-Particle Flow in a Small-Scale Fluidized Bed

Journal Article · · Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research
 [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Morgantown, WV (United States)
  2. National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Morgantown, WV (United States); West Virginia Univ. Research Corp., Morgantown, WV (United States)

Several discrete particle methods exist in the open literature to simulate fluidized bed systems, such as discrete element method (DEM), time driven hard sphere (TDHS), coarse-grained particle method (CGPM), coarse grained hard sphere (CGHS), and multi-phase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC). These different approaches usually solve the fluid phase in a Eulerian fixed frame of reference and the particle phase using the Lagrangian method. The first difference between these models lies in tracking either real particles or lumped parcels. The second difference is in the treatment of particle-particle interactions: by calculating collision forces (DEM and CGPM), using momentum conservation laws (TDHS and CGHS), or based on particle stress model (MP-PIC). These major model differences lead to a wide range of results accuracy and computation speed. However, these models have never been compared directly using the same experimental dataset. In this research, a small-scale fluidized bed is simulated with these methods using the same open-source code MFIX. The results indicate that modeling the particle-particle collision by TDHS increases the computation speed while maintaining good accuracy. Also, lumping few particles in a parcel increases the computation speed with little loss in accuracy. However, modeling particle-particle interactions with solids stress leads to a big loss in accuracy with a little increase in computation speed. The MP-PIC method predicts an unphysical particle-particle overlap, which results in incorrect voidage distribution and incorrect overall bed hydrodynamics. Based on this study, we recommend using the CGHS method for fluidized bed simulations due to its computational speed that rivals that of MPPIC while maintaining a much better accuracy.

Research Organization:
National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Morgantown, WV (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
OSTI ID:
1433640
Report Number(s):
NETL--PUB-21100
Journal Information:
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, Journal Name: Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research Journal Issue: 27 Vol. 56; ISSN 0888-5885
Publisher:
American Chemical Society (ACS)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (42)

Drag force of intermediate Reynolds number flow past mono- and bidisperse arrays of spheres journal January 2007
An efficient and reliable predictive method for fluidized bed simulation journal June 2017
Multiscale Discrete Supercomputing - A Game Changer for Process Simulation? journal March 2015
Discrete particle simulation of bubble and slug formation in a two-dimensional gas-fluidised bed: A hard-sphere approach journal January 1996
Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed journal October 1993
The multiphase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC) method for dense particulate flows journal April 1996
Particle-motion-resolved discrete model for simulating gas–solid fluidization journal July 1999
The effect of numerical diffusion on simulation of isolated bubbles in a gas–solid fluidized bed journal May 2001
Computational study of fluctuating motions and cluster structures in gas–particle flows journal February 2002
CPFD simulations of an industrial-sized dual fluidized bed steam gasification system of biomass with 8 MW fuel input journal March 2017
Performance of drag models for simulation of fluidized beds with Geldart D particles journal November 2016
Verification and validation of a coarse grain model of the DEM in a bubbling fluidized bed journal May 2014
Development and validation of a new drag law using mechanical energy balance approach for DEM–CFD simulation of gas–solid fluidized bed journal October 2016
Influence of grid resolution, parcel size and drag models on bubbling fluidized bed simulation journal October 2017
Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: A review of major applications and findings journal December 2008
Why the two-fluid model fails to predict the bed expansion characteristics of Geldart A particles in gas-fluidized beds: A tentative answer journal February 2009
Large-scale discrete element modeling in pneumatic conveying journal February 2009
MP-PIC simulation of CFB riser with EMMS-based drag model journal September 2012
A drag model for filtered Euler–Lagrange simulations of clustered gas–particle suspensions journal September 2014
EMMS-based discrete particle method (EMMS–DPM) for simulation of gas–solid flows journal December 2014
CFD simulation of dense particulate reaction system: Approaches, recent advances and applications journal February 2016
Computer virtual experiment on fluidized beds using a coarse-grained discrete particle method—EMMS-DPM journal November 2016
Fluid and particle coarsening of drag force for discrete-parcel approach journal November 2016
Numerical investigation and comparison of coarse grain CFD – DEM and TFM in the case of a 1 MW th fluidized bed carbonator simulation journal May 2017
Extension of a coarse grained particle method to simulate heat transfer in fluidized beds journal August 2017
Applicability of a coarse-grained CFD–DEM model on dense medium cyclone journal May 2016
Quasi-real-time simulation of rotating drum using discrete element method with parallel GPU computing journal August 2011
DEM speedup: Stiffness effects on behavior of bulk material journal February 2014
A new method for decomposition of high speed particle image velocimetry data journal April 2012
Open-source MFIX-DEM software for gas–solids flows: Part I—Verification studies journal April 2012
Open-source MFIX-DEM software for gas-solids flows: Part II — Validation studies journal April 2012
A critical validation study on CPFD model in simulating gas–solid bubbling fluidized beds journal September 2014
Measurements of pressure drop and particle velocity in a pseudo 2-D rectangular bed with Geldart Group D particles journal April 2016
Numerical study of a fluid catalytic cracking regenerator hydrodynamics journal January 2017
Two-Fluid Model Simulations of the National Energy Technology Laboratory Bubbling Fluidized Bed Challenge Problem journal April 2016
Coarse-Grained-Particle Method for Simulation of Liquid–Solids Reacting Flows journal September 2016
Fluid Mechanical Description of Fluidized Beds. Equations of Motion journal November 1967
Estimation of Numerical Errors Related to Some Basic Assumptions in Discrete Particle Methods journal November 2010
Fluid Beds: At Last, Challenging Two Entrenched Practices journal December 1985
What Don't We Know? journal July 2005
Numerical Simulation of Dense Gas-Solid Fluidized Beds: A Multiscale Modeling Strategy journal January 2008
[仮想球モデルを用いた離散要素法による2次元流動層シミュレーション] journal January 2000

Cited By (1)

Pyrolysis characteristics of Kazakhstan coals in non-isothermal and isothermal conditions journal April 2019

Similar Records

Extension of a coarse grained particle method to simulate heat transfer in fluidized beds
Journal Article · Tue Apr 18 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · OSTI ID:1402455

Coarse-Grained-Particle Method for Simulation of Liquid–Solids Reacting Flows
Journal Article · Thu Sep 08 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research · OSTI ID:1477859

An efficient and reliable predictive method for fluidized bed simulation
Journal Article · Tue Jun 13 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · AIChE Journal · OSTI ID:1402453