skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Exploring the impacts of a national U.S. CO2 tax and revenue recycling options with a coupled electricity-economy model

Journal Article · · Climate Change Economics
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [3]
  1. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States); HEC Montreal, QC (Canada)
  2. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
  3. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)

This paper provides a comprehensive exploration of the impacts of economy-wide CO2 taxes in the U.S. simulated using a detailed electric sector model [the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS)] linked with a computable general equilibrium model of the U.S. economy [the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's U.S. Regional Energy Policy (USREP) model]. We implement various tax trajectories and options for using the revenue collected by the tax and describe their impact on household welfare and its distribution across income levels. Overall, we find that our top-down/bottom-up models affects estimates of the distribution and cost of emission reductions as well as the amount of revenue collected, but that these are mostly insensitive to the way the revenue is recycled. We find that substantial abatement opportunities through fuel switching and renewable penetration in the electricity sector allow the economy to accommodate extensive emissions reductions at relatively low cost. While welfare impacts are largely determined by the choice of revenue recycling scheme, all tax levels and schemes provide net benefits when accounting for the avoided global climate change benefits of emission reductions. Recycling revenue through capital income tax rebates is more efficient than labor income tax rebates or uniform transfers to households. While capital tax rebates substantially reduce the overall costs of emission abatement, they profit high income households the most and are regressive. We more generally identify a clear trade-off between equity and efficiency across the various recycling options. However, we show through a set of hybrid recycling schemes that it is possible to limit inequalities in impacts, particularly those on the lowest income households, at relatively little incremental cost.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of International Affairs (IA), Climate Change Policy and Technology (IA-40)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
1431047
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-6A20-70282
Journal Information:
Climate Change Economics, Vol. 09, Issue 01; ISSN 2010-0078
Publisher:
World ScientificCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (8)

Leakage from sub-national climate policy: The case of California�s cap�and�trade program journal April 2015
Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling journal November 1995
Carbon Taxes, Deficits, and Energy Policy Interactions journal March 2015
The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting journal June 1999
Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis journal November 1995
Distributional effects of a carbon tax in broader U.S. fiscal reform journal March 2014
Natural Gas From Shale Bursts Onto the Scene journal June 2010
Double dividend effectiveness of energy tax policies and the elasticity of substitution: A CGE appraisal journal June 2010

Cited By (2)