skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Selecting an Informative/Discriminating Multivariate Response for Inverse Prediction

Journal Article · · Journal of Quality Technology
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [2]
  1. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
  2. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  3. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States); Intl Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna (Austria)

nverse prediction is important in a wide variety of scientific and engineering contexts. One might use inverse prediction to predict fundamental properties/characteristics of an object using measurements obtained from it. This can be accomplished by “inverting” parameterized forward models that relate the measurements (responses) to the properties/characteristics of interest. Sometimes forward models are science based; but often, forward models are empirically based, using the results of experimentation. For empirically-based forward models, it is important that the experiments provide a sound basis to develop accurate forward models in terms of the properties/characteristics (factors). While nature dictates the causal relationship between factors and responses, experimenters can influence control of the type, accuracy, and precision of forward models that can be constructed via selection of factors, factor levels, and the set of trials that are performed. Whether the forward models are based on science, experiments or both, researchers can influence the ability to perform inverse prediction by selecting informative response variables. By using an errors-in-variables framework for inverse prediction, this paper shows via simple analysis and examples how the capability of a multivariate response (with respect to being informative and discriminating) can vary depending on how well the various responses complement one another over the range of the factor-space of interest. Insights derived from this analysis could be useful for selecting a set of response variables among candidates in cases where the number of response variables that can be acquired is limited by difficulty, expense, and/or availability of material.

Research Organization:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
OSTI ID:
1427203
Report Number(s):
SAND-2015-6485J; 598743
Journal Information:
Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 3; ISSN 0022-4065
Publisher:
American Society for Quality (ASQ)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (9)

Partial least-squares methods for spectral analyses. 1. Relation to other quantitative calibration methods and the extraction of qualitative information journal June 1988
Design of experiments and data analysis challenges in calibration for forensics applications journal December 2015
Some neural network applications in environmental sciences. Part I: forward and inverse problems in geophysical remote measurements journal April 2003
Errors-in-Variables Estimation in Multivariate Calibration journal November 1991
Shrinkage Estimators for Covariance Matrices journal December 2001
Classical and Inverse Regression Methods of Calibration journal August 1967
The Inverse Problem in Electrocardiography: A Model Study of the Effects of Geometry and Conductivity Parameters on the Reconstruction of Epicardial Potentials journal July 1986
Statistical analysis for nuclear forensics experiments: Statistical Analysis for Nuclear Forensics Experiments
  • Anderson-Cook, Christine M.; Burr, Tom; Hamada, M. S.
  • Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, Vol. 8, Issue 5-6 https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.11278
journal July 2015
Response surface design evaluation and comparison journal February 2009