Selecting an Informative/Discriminating Multivariate Response for Inverse Prediction
Journal Article
·
· Journal of Quality Technology
- Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
- Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
- Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States); Intl Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna (Austria)
nverse prediction is important in a wide variety of scientific and engineering contexts. One might use inverse prediction to predict fundamental properties/characteristics of an object using measurements obtained from it. This can be accomplished by “inverting” parameterized forward models that relate the measurements (responses) to the properties/characteristics of interest. Sometimes forward models are science based; but often, forward models are empirically based, using the results of experimentation. For empirically-based forward models, it is important that the experiments provide a sound basis to develop accurate forward models in terms of the properties/characteristics (factors). While nature dictates the causal relationship between factors and responses, experimenters can influence control of the type, accuracy, and precision of forward models that can be constructed via selection of factors, factor levels, and the set of trials that are performed. Whether the forward models are based on science, experiments or both, researchers can influence the ability to perform inverse prediction by selecting informative response variables. By using an errors-in-variables framework for inverse prediction, this paper shows via simple analysis and examples how the capability of a multivariate response (with respect to being informative and discriminating) can vary depending on how well the various responses complement one another over the range of the factor-space of interest. Insights derived from this analysis could be useful for selecting a set of response variables among candidates in cases where the number of response variables that can be acquired is limited by difficulty, expense, and/or availability of material.
- Research Organization:
- Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC04-94AL85000
- OSTI ID:
- 1427203
- Report Number(s):
- SAND--2015-6485J; 598743
- Journal Information:
- Journal of Quality Technology, Journal Name: Journal of Quality Technology Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 49; ISSN 0022-4065
- Publisher:
- American Society for Quality (ASQ)Copyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Selecting an Informative/Discriminating Multivariate Response for Inverse Prediction
Comparing multiple statistical methods for inverse prediction in nuclear forensics applications
Insights into multivariate calibration using errors-in-variables modeling
Journal Article
·
Fri Jun 30 20:00:00 EDT 2017
· Journal of Quality Technology
·
OSTI ID:1375866
Comparing multiple statistical methods for inverse prediction in nuclear forensics applications
Journal Article
·
Sat Oct 28 20:00:00 EDT 2017
· Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
·
OSTI ID:1415409
Insights into multivariate calibration using errors-in-variables modeling
Conference
·
Sun Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 1996
·
OSTI ID:286116