skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Instrumental Response Model and Detrending for the Dark Energy Camera

Journal Article · · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [2];  [7];  [7]
  1. Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
  2. National Optical Astronomy Observatory, La Serena (Chile)
  3. IIT Hyderabad, Telangana (India)
  4. Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA (United States); SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
  5. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL (United States); National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Urbana, IL (United States)
  6. National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Urbana, IL (United States)
  7. Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
  8. Excellence Cluster Universe, Garching (Germany); Ludwig-Maximilians Univ. Munchen, Munchen (Germany)

We describe the model for mapping from sky brightness to the digital output of the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) and the algorithms adopted by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) for inverting this model to obtain photometric measures of celestial objects from the raw camera output. This calibration aims for fluxes that are uniform across the camera field of view and across the full angular and temporal span of the DES observations, approaching the accuracy limits set by shot noise for the full dynamic range of DES observations. The DES pipeline incorporates several substantive advances over standard detrending techniques, including principal-components-based sky and fringe subtraction; correction of the "brighter-fatter" nonlinearity; use of internal consistency in on-sky observations to disentangle the influences of quantum efficiency, pixel-size variations, and scattered light in the dome flats; and pixel-by-pixel characterization of instrument spectral response, through combination of internal-consistency constraints with auxiliary calibration data. This article provides conceptual derivations of the detrending/calibration steps, and the procedures for obtaining the necessary calibration data. Other publications will describe the implementation of these concepts for the DES operational pipeline, the detailed methods, and the validation that the techniques can bring DECam photometry and astrometry within $$\approx 2$$ mmag and $$\approx 3$$ mas, respectively, of fundamental atmospheric and statistical limits. In conclusion, the DES techniques should be broadly applicable to wide-field imagers.

Research Organization:
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Contributing Organization:
DES Collaboration
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-76SF00515; AST-1615555; SC0007901
OSTI ID:
1410603
Journal Information:
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 129, Issue 981; ISSN 0004-6280
Publisher:
Astronomical Society of the PacificCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 32 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (24)

The brighter-fatter effect and pixel correlations in CCD sensors journal March 2014
Intrinsic pixel size variation in an LSST prototype sensor journal May 2015
Astrometric Calibration and Performance of the Dark Energy Camera journal May 2017
SExtractor: Software for source extraction journal June 1996
All-Weather Calibration of Wide-Field Optical and nir Surveys journal December 2013
Robust principal component analysis? journal May 2011
The first and second data releases of the Kilo-Degree Survey journal October 2015
The Blanco Cosmology Survey: data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics, and data Release journal September 2012
The dark Energy Camera journal October 2015
Characterization and correction of charge-induced pixel shifts in DECam journal May 2015
Care, Feeding, And Use Of Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) Imagers At Palomar Observatory conference January 1981
Conference summary journal April 2014
New wide-field corrector for the Kitt Peak Mayall 4-m telescope conference July 1998
Monitoring the atmospheric throughput at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory with aTmCam conference July 2014
Assessment of Systematic Chromatic Errors that Impact Sub-1% Photometric Precision in Large-Area sky Surveys journal May 2016
K-band galaxy counts journal January 1995
The Dark Energy Survey data processing and calibration system conference September 2012
An Improved Photometric Calibration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data journal February 2008
An update on the status and performance of the Radiometric All-Sky Infrared Camera (RASICAM) conference August 2014
Theli: Convenient Reduction of Optical, Near-Infrared, and Mid-Infrared Imaging data journal November 2013
Toward 1% Photometry: End‐to‐End Calibration of Astronomical Telescopes and Detectors journal August 2006
Gaia Data Release 1 : Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties journal November 2016
Low-light-level charge-coupled device imaging in astronomy journal January 1986
Conference summary journal May 2015

Cited By (11)

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope and Milky Way Science journal July 2017
First Data Release of the All-sky NOAO Source Catalog journal August 2018
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Photometric Pipeline and Light-curve Data Release journal March 2019
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Detection of Intracluster Light at Redshift ∼ 0.25 journal April 2019
The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1 journal November 2018
A Search for Optical Emission from Binary Black Hole Merger GW170814 with the Dark Energy Camera journal March 2019
GROWTH on S190426c: Real-time Search for a Counterpart to the Probable Neutron Star–Black Hole Merger using an Automated Difference Imaging Pipeline for DECam journal August 2019
The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1 text January 2018
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope and Milky Way Science text January 2017
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy Survey: Photometric Pipeline and Light Curve Data Release text January 2018
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Detection of Intra-cluster Light at Redshift $\sim$ 0.25 text January 2018

Similar Records

Instrumental response model and detrending for the Dark Energy Camera
Journal Article · Thu Jun 29 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · Publ.Astron.Soc.Pac. · OSTI ID:1410603

Photometric Characterization of the Dark Energy Camera
Journal Article · Mon Apr 02 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · OSTI ID:1410603

Astrometric calibration and performance of the Dark Energy Camera
Journal Article · Tue May 30 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · OSTI ID:1410603