Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Learning an Eddy Viscosity Model Using Shrinkage and Bayesian Calibration: A Jet-in-Crossflow Case Study

Journal Article · · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems. Part B. Mechanical Engineering
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037557· OSTI ID:1399494
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [2]
  1. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)
  2. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)

In this paper, we demonstrate a statistical procedure for learning a high-order eddy viscosity model (EVM) from experimental data and using it to improve the predictive skill of a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulator. The method is tested in a three-dimensional (3D), transonic jet-in-crossflow (JIC) configuration. The process starts with a cubic eddy viscosity model (CEVM) developed for incompressible flows. It is fitted to limited experimental JIC data using shrinkage regression. The shrinkage process removes all the terms from the model, except an intercept, a linear term, and a quadratic one involving the square of the vorticity. The shrunk eddy viscosity model is implemented in an RANS simulator and calibrated, using vorticity measurements, to infer three parameters. The calibration is Bayesian and is solved using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. A 3D probability density distribution for the inferred parameters is constructed, thus quantifying the uncertainty in the estimate. The phenomenal cost of using a 3D flow simulator inside an MCMC loop is mitigated by using surrogate models (“curve-fits”). A support vector machine classifier (SVMC) is used to impose our prior belief regarding parameter values, specifically to exclude nonphysical parameter combinations. The calibrated model is compared, in terms of its predictive skill, to simulations using uncalibrated linear and CEVMs. Finally, we find that the calibrated model, with one quadratic term, is more accurate than the uncalibrated simulator. The model is also checked at a flow condition at which the model was not calibrated.

Research Organization:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States); Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Office of Defense Programs (DP) (NA-10)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
OSTI ID:
1399494
Report Number(s):
SAND2017--2412J; 651471
Journal Information:
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems. Part B. Mechanical Engineering, Journal Name: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems. Part B. Mechanical Engineering Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 4; ISSN 2332-9017
Publisher:
American Society of Mechanical EngineersCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Tuning a RANS k-e model for jet-in-crossflow simulations.
Technical Report · Sun Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2013 · OSTI ID:1096265

Validation of Calibrated k–ε Model Parameters for Jet-in-Crossflow
Journal Article · Mon May 09 00:00:00 EDT 2022 · AIAA Journal · OSTI ID:1872012

Estimation of k-ε parameters using surrogate models and jet-in-crossflow data
Technical Report · Sat Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · OSTI ID:1170402