skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Observed and Projected Changes to the Precipitation Annual Cycle

 [1];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [2];  [4]
  1. Columbia University, and NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
  2. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York
  3. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
  4. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
OSTI Identifier:
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0014423; NNX14AB99A
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Published Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Climate
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 30; Journal Issue: 13; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2017-08-01 12:35:59; Journal ID: ISSN 0894-8755
American Meteorological Society
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Marvel, Kate, Biasutti, Michela, Bonfils, Céline, Taylor, Karl E., Kushnir, Yochanan, and Cook, Benjamin I. Observed and Projected Changes to the Precipitation Annual Cycle. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0572.1.
Marvel, Kate, Biasutti, Michela, Bonfils, Céline, Taylor, Karl E., Kushnir, Yochanan, & Cook, Benjamin I. Observed and Projected Changes to the Precipitation Annual Cycle. United States. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0572.1.
Marvel, Kate, Biasutti, Michela, Bonfils, Céline, Taylor, Karl E., Kushnir, Yochanan, and Cook, Benjamin I. Tue . "Observed and Projected Changes to the Precipitation Annual Cycle". United States. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0572.1.
title = {Observed and Projected Changes to the Precipitation Annual Cycle},
author = {Marvel, Kate and Biasutti, Michela and Bonfils, Céline and Taylor, Karl E. and Kushnir, Yochanan and Cook, Benjamin I.},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0572.1},
journal = {Journal of Climate},
number = 13,
volume = 30,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Feb 21 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Tue Feb 21 00:00:00 EST 2017}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
This content will become publicly available on June 7, 2018
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 1work
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:
  • Here, we analyze the past (1900–2015) temperature and precipitation changes in nine separate US climate regions. We find that the temperature increased in a statistically significant (95% confidence level equivalent to alpha level of 0.05) manner in all of these regions. However, the variability in the observed precipitation was much more complex. In the eastern US (east of Rocky Mountains), the precipitation increased in all five climate regions and the increase was statistically significant in three of them. In contract, in the western US, the precipitation increased in two regions and decreased in two with no statistical significance in anymore » region. The CMIP5 climate models (an ensemble mean) were not able to capture properly either the large precipitation differences between the eastern and the western US, or the changes of precipitation between 1900 and 2015 in eastern US. The statistical regression model explains the differences between the eastern and western US precipitation as results of different significant predictors. The anthropogenic greenhouse gases and aerosol (GHGA) are the major forcing of the precipitation in the eastern part of US, while the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) has the major influence on precipitation in the western part of the US. This analysis suggests that the precipitation over the eastern US increased at an approximate rate of 6.7%/K, in agreement with the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, while the precipitation of the western US was approximately constant, independent of the temperature. Future precipitation over the western part of the US will depend on the behavior of the PDO, and how it (PDO) may be affected by future warming. Low hydrological sensitivity (percent increase of precipitation per one K of warming) projected by the CMIP5 models for the eastern US suggests either an underestimate of future precipitation or an overestimate of future warming.« less
  • Using sensitive riometers (30 MHz) and magnetometers at Siple Station, Antarctica, and at four locations in the conjugate area in the northeastern United States and Southern Quebec, we have studied the temporal and spatial extent of the impulsive losses of electrons from the radiation belts and the concurrent accompanying magnetic field variations produced by the changes in ionospheric current systems. The impulsive variations have a short (approx.2--4 s) onset time and aapprox.5--10 s decay time. The observed decay times in the riometer and magnetometer signals are consistent with the recombination times in the ionosphere at approx.90--100 km. Often the magneticmore » field fluctuations are observed to occur primarily in the east-west direction and are out of phase between the southern and northern hemisphere. These observations suggest that predominantly north-south ionospheric currents and modified and/or produced by such impulsive precipitation. Time delays in the occurence of the events between the northern and southern hemispheres, as well as time and spatial difference observed between the northern hemispheres, and well as time and spatial differences observed between the nrothern hemisphere stations, suggest that irregularly shaped, gradient B drifting patches of precipitating electrons could be the source of these impulsive events.« less
  • Record rainfall amounts were recorded during Hurricane Harvey in the Houston, Texas, area, leading to widespread flooding. We analyze observed precipitation from the Global Historical Climatology Network with a covariate-based extreme value statistical analysis, accounting for both the external influence of global warming and the internal influence of El Niño–Southern Oscillation. We find that human-induced climate change likely increased the chances of the observed precipitation accumulations during Hurricane Harvey in the most affected areas of Houston by a factor of at least 3.5. Further, precipitation accumulations in these areas were likely increased by at least 18.8% (best estimate of 37.7%),more » which is larger than the 6–7% associated with an attributable warming of 1°C in the Gulf of Mexico and Clausius-Clapeyron scaling. Thus, in a Granger causality sense, these statements provide lower bounds on the impact of climate change and motivate further attribution studies using dynamical climate models.« less
  • Monthly average currents and temperatures predicted by a three-dimensional, numerical model of Lake Michigan are compared with observations made in that lake during June--October 1976. The observed data are from 17 urrent meters with integral temperature recorders that were concentrated on a transverse section of the southern basin of the lake. A brief interpretation of the overall aspects of these data is given and the evolution of a deep temperature anomaly in the west-central basin is discussed. Model results are evaluated in terms of their comparability with the dominant features of the observed data. Lakewide-average temperatures in the model aremore » reasonable and the signs of the computed and observed currents show some agreement. However, the model exaggerates upwelling along the upwind (western) shore, leading to temperature predictions that worsen progressively throughout the stratified season. The present study and other recent work suggest the need for imporved mixed-layer physics in lake models.« less