skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States

Journal Article · · Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12445· OSTI ID:1352296
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12];  [13];  [14];  [15];  [16];  [8];  [17] more »;  [18];  [19];  [20];  [21];  [14];  [22];  [23];  [24];  [25];  [26];  [27];  [28];  [29];  [3];  [30] « less
  1. Center for BioEnergy Sustainability Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN 37831‐6036 USA
  2. NSW Department of Primary Industries University of New England Armidale NSW Australia
  3. Weyerhaeuser Company Vanceboro NC 28586 USA
  4. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse NY 13210 USA
  5. Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ UK
  6. University of Toronto Toronto ON M5S 3B3 Canada
  7. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Clemson SC 29634 USA
  8. University of Copenhagen DK‐1958 Frederiksberg C Denmark
  9. Chalmers University of Technology SE‐41296 Göteborg Sweden
  10. Canadian Forest Service Québec G1V 4C7 QC Canada
  11. Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation 24‐100 Pulawy Poland
  12. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Golden CO 80401‐3305 USA
  13. Centre for Environmental Policy Imperial College London SW7 2AZ London UK
  14. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SE‐750 07 Uppsala Sweden
  15. Linnaeus University 351 95 Växjö Sweden
  16. Thünen Institute of International Forestry and Forest Economics 21031 Hamburg Germany
  17. Sustainable Forestry Initiative, Inc. Washington DC 20037 USA
  18. State University of Campinas (UNICAMP) 13083‐860 Campinas SP Brazil
  19. Rothamsted Research Harpenden AL5 2JQ UK
  20. University of the Sunshine Coast Maroochydore DC Qld 4558 Australia
  21. North Carolina State University (NCSU) Raleigh NC 27695 USA
  22. University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ UK
  23. Bioenergy Technologies Office U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Washington DC 20585 USA
  24. University of Tennessee Forest Resources AgResearch and Education Center Oak Ridge TN 37830 USA
  25. Enviva LP Bethesda MD 20814 USA
  26. Bioenergy Technologies Office U.S. Department of Energy Golden CO 80401 USA
  27. Innovative Natural Resource Solutions, LLC Antrim NH 03301 USA
  28. Resource Management Service, LLC Birmingham AL 35242 USA
  29. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) Argonne IL 60439 USA
  30. Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada (AAFC) Ottawa ON K1A OC5 Canada

The ongoing debate about costs and benefits of wood-pellet based bioenergy production in the southeastern United States (SE USA) requires an understanding of the science and context influencing market decisions associated with its sustainability. Production of pellets has garnered much attention as US exports have grown from negligible amounts in the early 2000s to 4.6 million metric tonnes in 2015. Currently, 98% of these pellet exports are shipped to Europe to displace coal in power plants. We ask, ‘How is the production of wood pellets in the SE USA affecting forest systems and the ecosystem services they provide?’ To address this question, we review current forest conditions and the status of the wood products industry, how pellet production affects ecosystem services and biodiversity, and what methods are in place to monitor changes and protect vulnerable systems. Scientific studies provide evidence that wood pellets in the SE USA are a fraction of total forestry operations and can be produced while maintaining or improving forest ecosystem services. Ecosystem services are protected by the requirement to utilize loggers trained to apply scientifically based best management practices in planning and implementing harvest for the export market. Bioenergy markets supplement incomes to private rural landholders and provide an incentive for forest management practices that simultaneously benefit water quality and wildlife and reduce risk of fire and insect outbreaks. Bioenergy also increases the value of forest land to landowners, thereby decreasing likelihood of conversion to nonforest uses. Monitoring and evaluation are essential to verify that regulations and good practices are achieving goals and to enable timely responses if problems arise. Conducting rigorous research to understand how conditions change in response to management choices requires baseline data, monitoring, and appropriate reference scenarios. Long-term monitoring data on forest conditions should be publicly accessible and utilized to inform adaptive management.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Sustainable Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308; AC05-00OR22725
OSTI ID:
1352296
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1352297; OSTI ID: 1373676; OSTI ID: 1408618
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5100-68172
Journal Information:
Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy Vol. 9 Journal Issue: 8; ISSN 1757-1693
Publisher:
Wiley-BlackwellCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 46 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (53)

Effects of timber harvest and other factors on a floodplain forest indicator species, the prothonotary warbler journal June 2009
Bioenergy and water—the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply journal December 2002
Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution journal March 2007
Projected gains and losses of wildlife habitat from bioenergy-induced landscape change journal August 2016
Restoring Fire to Long-Unburned Pinus palustris Ecosystems: Novel Fire Effects and Consequences for Long-Unburned Ecosystems journal September 2005
Accounting for Carbon Dioxide Emissions: The Context and Stakeholders Matter journal May 2013
Bioenergy production and forest landscape change in the southeastern United States journal August 2016
Costs and CO2 benefits of recovering, refining and transporting logging residues for fossil fuel replacement journal January 2011
Trading Water for Carbon with Biological Carbon Sequestration journal December 2005
A matter of tree longevity journal January 2017
Estimating product and energy substitution benefits in national-scale mitigation analyses for Canada journal August 2016
Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production journal November 2014
Carbon balances of bioenergy systems using biomass from forests managed with long rotations: bridging the gap between stand and landscape assessments journal February 2017
Forest bioenergy feedstock harvesting effects on water supply: Forest bioenergy feedstock harvesting journal July 2012
Wood pellets, what else? Greenhouse gas parity times of European electricity from wood pellets produced in the south-eastern United States using different softwood feedstocks journal January 2017
Comparing Bioenergy Production Sites in the Southeastern US Regarding Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand journal March 2015
Ecological objectives can be achieved with wood-derived bioenergy journal August 2015
Environmental factors in woodfuel production: Opportunities, risks, and criteria and indicators for sustainable practices journal October 2009
Overview of Forest Biomass Harvesting Guidelines journal January 2013
A meta-analysis of biodiversity responses to management of southeastern pine forests—opportunities for open pine conservation journal January 2016
Uncertainty in projecting GHG emissions from bioenergy journal November 2014
Greenhouse gas performance of heat and electricity from wood pellet value chains - based on pellets for the Swedish market journal March 2015
Sustainability guidelines and forest market response: an assessment of European Union pellet demand in the southeastern United States journal May 2015
The Burning Question: Does Forest Bioenergy Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Review of Common Misconceptions about Forest Carbon Accounting journal January 2015
Family Forest Owner Characteristics Shaped by Life Cycle, Cohort, and Period Effects journal March 2016
Winter bird use of harvest residues in clearcuts and the implications of forest bioenergy harvest in the southeastern United States journal November 2016
The burning question journal January 2017
Understory vegetation as an indicator for floodplain forest restoration in the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley, U.S.A.: Vegetation indicators for floodplain forest restoration journal April 2015
Economic Sustainability of Payments for Water Yield in Slash Pine Plantations in Florida journal September 2016
Winter Browse Selection by White-Tailed Deer and Implications for Bottomland Forest Restoration in the Upper Mississippi River Valley, USA journal April 2014
Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies book January 2015
Impacts of inadequate historical disturbance data in the early twentieth century on modeling recent carbon dynamics (1951-2010) in conterminous U.S. forests: Impact of inadequate disturbances on C journal March 2015
Greenhouse gas balance of harvesting stumps and logging residues for energy in Sweden journal May 2011
Breeding, Early-Successional Bird Response to Forest Harvests for Bioenergy journal October 2016
Forest biomass, carbon neutrality and climate change mitigation report October 2016
Role of the Tennessee Master Logger Program in Implementation of Best Management Practices on Non-Industrial Private Forests journal February 2003
The ‘debt’ is in the detail: A synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy journal April 2013
Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects journal November 2015
Do biomass harvesting guidelines influence herpetofauna following harvests of logging residues for renewable energy? journal April 2016
Greenhouse Gas and Carbon Profile of the U.S. Forest Products Industry Value Chain journal May 2010
Technical Note: Assessing Best Management Practices Effectiveness at the Watershed Scale journal January 2011
The Challenge of Lignocellulosic Bioenergy in a Water-Limited World journal February 2013
Biomass Harvesting Guidelines affect downed woody debris retention journal November 2014
Post-fire vegetation and fuel development influences fire severity patterns in reburns journal April 2016
Development of restoration trajectory metrics in reforested bottomland hardwood forests applying a rapid assessment approach journal November 2013
Effectiveness of forestry best management practices in the United States: Literature review journal January 2016
The Role of the Wetland Reserve Program in Conservation Efforts in the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley journal November 2006
Potential greenhouse gas benefits of transatlantic wood pellet trade journal January 2014
Forest Operations and Woody Biomass Logistics to Improve Efficiency, Value, and Sustainability journal June 2016
Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment - a review journal October 2012
A framework for selecting indicators of bioenergy sustainability journal May 2015
Southeastern United States wood pellets as a global energy resource: a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment derived from empirical data journal June 2016
Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management journal April 2012