Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States). School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems; Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States). Dept. of Biological Sciences
Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States). Dept. of Biological Sciences
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Environmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Inst.
Macquarie Univ., NSW (Australia). Dept. of Biological Sciences
Univ. of Western Sydney, NSW (Australia). Hawkesbury Inst. for the Environment
Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY (United States). Dept. of Botany
Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO (United States). Natural Resource Ecology Lab.
Univ. Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette (France). Lab. des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE)
Univ. of Exeter (United Kingdom). College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Sciences
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Ocean and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Vic. (Australia)
Max Planck Inst. for Biogeochemistry, Jena (Germany). Biogeochemical Integration Dept.
Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL (United States). Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt (Germany)
Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK (United States). Dept. of Microbiology & Plant Biology; East China Normal Univ. (ECNU), Shanghai (China). Research Center for Global Change and Ecological Forecasting
Univ. of Western Sydney, NSW (Australia). Hawkesbury Inst. for the Environment; Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY (United States). Dept. of Botany
Determining whether the terrestrial biosphere will be a source or sink of carbon (C) under a future climate of elevated CO2 (eCO2) and warming requires accurate quantification of gross primary production (GPP), the largest flux of C in the global C cycle. We evaluated six years (2007-2012) of flux-derived GPP data from the Prairie Heating and CO2 Enrichment (PHACE) experiment, situated in a mixed prairie grassland in Wyoming (USA). The GPP data were fitted to a mixed effects model that extended a light response model to include the effects of environmental (soil water content, vegetation greenness, nitrogen) and meteorological data (air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, photosynthetically active radiation) at current and past times. The stimulation of the cumulative six-year GPP by warming (20%, P=0.06) and eCO2 (19%, P=0.14) were primarily driven by enhanced C uptake during spring (96%, P=0.003) and fall (115%, P=0.001), respectively. These enhancements were consistent across each year, suggesting mechanisms for extending the growing season. Vapor pressure deficit from 1-3 days prior was the most significant predictor of temporalvariability in GPP and for explaining treatment differences in GPP, suggesting that atmospheric drought plays an important role for predicting GPP now and under future climate conditions.
Ryan, Edmund M., et al. "Gross primary production responses to warming, elevated CO <sub>2</sub> , and irrigation: quantifying the drivers of ecosystem physiology in a semiarid grassland." Global Change Biology, vol. 23, no. 8, Dec. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13602
Ryan, Edmund M., Ogle, Kiona, Peltier, Drew, Walker, Anthony P., de Kauwe, Martin G., Medlyn, Belinda E., Williams, David G., Parton, William, Asao, Shinichi, Guenet, Bertrand, Harper, Anna B., Lu, Xingjie, Luus, Kristina A., Zaehle, Sönke, Shu, Shijie, Werner, Christian, Xia, Jianyang, & Pendall, Elise (2016). Gross primary production responses to warming, elevated CO <sub>2</sub> , and irrigation: quantifying the drivers of ecosystem physiology in a semiarid grassland. Global Change Biology, 23(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13602
Ryan, Edmund M., Ogle, Kiona, Peltier, Drew, et al., "Gross primary production responses to warming, elevated CO <sub>2</sub> , and irrigation: quantifying the drivers of ecosystem physiology in a semiarid grassland," Global Change Biology 23, no. 8 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13602
@article{osti_1349600,
author = {Ryan, Edmund M. and Ogle, Kiona and Peltier, Drew and Walker, Anthony P. and de Kauwe, Martin G. and Medlyn, Belinda E. and Williams, David G. and Parton, William and Asao, Shinichi and Guenet, Bertrand and others},
title = {Gross primary production responses to warming, elevated CO <sub>2</sub> , and irrigation: quantifying the drivers of ecosystem physiology in a semiarid grassland},
annote = {Determining whether the terrestrial biosphere will be a source or sink of carbon (C) under a future climate of elevated CO2 (eCO2) and warming requires accurate quantification of gross primary production (GPP), the largest flux of C in the global C cycle. We evaluated six years (2007-2012) of flux-derived GPP data from the Prairie Heating and CO2 Enrichment (PHACE) experiment, situated in a mixed prairie grassland in Wyoming (USA). The GPP data were fitted to a mixed effects model that extended a light response model to include the effects of environmental (soil water content, vegetation greenness, nitrogen) and meteorological data (air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, photosynthetically active radiation) at current and past times. The stimulation of the cumulative six-year GPP by warming (20%, P=0.06) and eCO2 (19%, P=0.14) were primarily driven by enhanced C uptake during spring (96%, P=0.003) and fall (115%, P=0.001), respectively. These enhancements were consistent across each year, suggesting mechanisms for extending the growing season. Vapor pressure deficit from 1-3 days prior was the most significant predictor of temporalvariability in GPP and for explaining treatment differences in GPP, suggesting that atmospheric drought plays an important role for predicting GPP now and under future climate conditions.},
doi = {10.1111/gcb.13602},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1349600},
journal = {Global Change Biology},
issn = {ISSN 1354-1013},
number = {8},
volume = {23},
place = {United States},
publisher = {Wiley},
year = {2016},
month = {12}}