AerChemMIP: Quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6

Collins, William J.; Lamarque, Jean -FranÃ§ois; Schulz, Michael; Boucher, Olivier; Eyring, Veronika; Hegglin, Michaela I.; Maycock, Amanda; Myhre, Gunnar; Prather, Michael; Shindell, Drew; Smith, Steven J.

doi:10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017

Title: AerChemMIP: Quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6

Journal Article · Thu Feb 09 00:00:00 EST 2017 · Geoscientific Model Development (Online)

DOI:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017· OSTI ID:1349156

^[1]; Lamarque, Jean -FranÃ§ois ^[2]; Schulz, Michael ^[3];

^[4]; Eyring, Veronika ^[5]; Hegglin, Michaela I. ^[1]; Maycock, Amanda ^[6]; Myhre, Gunnar ^[7];

^[8];

^[9];

^[10]

Univ. of Reading, Reading (United Kingdom)
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States)
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo (Norway)
Univ. Pierre et Maire Curie/CNRS, Paris (France)
Institut fur Physik der Atmosphare, Oberpfaffenhofen (Germany)
Univ. of Leeds, Leeds (United Kingdom)
CICERO - Center for International Climate and Environmental Research Oslo, Oslo (Norway)
Univ. of California, Irvine, CA (United States)
Duke Univ., Durham, NC (United States)
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)

The Aerosol Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project (AerChemMIP) is endorsed by the Coupled-Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) and is designed to quantify the climate and air quality impacts of aerosols and chemically reactive gases. These are specifically near-term climate forcers (NTCFs: methane, tropospheric ozone and aerosols, and their precursors), nitrous oxide and ozone-depleting halocarbons. The aim of AerChemMIP is to answer four scientific questions. 1. How have anthropogenic emissions contributed to global radiative forcing and affected regional climate over the historical period? 2. How might future policies (on climate, air quality and land use) affect the abundances of NTCFs and their climate impacts? 3.How do uncertainties in historical NTCF emissions affect radiative forcing estimates? 4. How important are climate feedbacks to natural NTCF emissions, atmospheric composition, and radiative effects? These questions will be addressed through targeted simulations with CMIP6 climate models that include an interactive representation of tropospheric aerosols and atmospheric chemistry. These simulations build on the CMIP6 Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK) experiments, the CMIP6 historical simulations, and future projections performed elsewhere in CMIP6, allowing the contributions from aerosols and/or chemistry to be quantified. As a result, specific diagnostics are requested as part of the CMIP6 data request to highlight the chemical composition of the atmosphere, to evaluate the performance of the models, and to understand differences in behaviour between them.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE

Grant/Contract Number:: AC05-76RL01830

OSTI ID:: 1349156

Report Number(s):: PNNL-SA-121058; KP1703020

Journal Information:: Geoscientific Model Development (Online), Vol. 10, Issue 2; ISSN 1991-9603

Publisher:: European Geosciences UnionCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 150 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (107)

Contributions of External Forcings to Southern Annular Mode Trends Arblaster, Julie M.; Meehl, Gerald A. Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3774.1	journal	June 2006
Impacts of mechanistic changes on HO _x formation and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene Archibald, A. T.; Cooke, M. C.; Utembe, S. R. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 10, Issue 17 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8097-2010	journal	January 2010
Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the climate system Arneth, A.; Harrison, S. P.; Zaehle, S. Nature Geoscience, Vol. 3, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo905	journal	July 2010
Drivers of changes in stratospheric and tropospheric ozone between year 2000 and 2100 Banerjee, Antara; Maycock, Amanda C.; Archibald, Alexander T. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 16, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2727-2016	journal	January 2016
Earlier onset of the Indian monsoon in the late twentieth century: The role of anthropogenic aerosols: AEROSOLS AND INDIAN MONSOON ONSET Bollasina, Massimo A.; Ming, Yi; Ramaswamy, V. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50719	journal	July 2013
Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment: BLACK CARBON IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM Bond, T. C.; Doherty, S. J.; Fahey, D. W. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171	journal	June 2013
Changes in dimethyl sulfide oceanic distribution due to climate change: OCEANIC DMS AND CLIMATE CHANGE Cameron-Smith, Philip; Elliott, Scott; Maltrud, Mathew Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047069	journal	April 2011
To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled? Carlton, Annmarie G.; Pinder, Robert W.; Bhave, Prakash V. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1021/es903506b	journal	May 2010
Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing Carslaw, K. S.; Lee, L. A.; Reddington, C. L. Nature, Vol. 503, Issue 7474 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12674	journal	November 2013
Development and evaluation of an Earth-System model – HadGEM2 Collins, W. J.; Bellouin, N.; Doutriaux-Boucher, M. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 4, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-1051-2011	journal	January 2011
Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century Eyring, V.; Waugh, D. W.; Bodeker, G. E. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 112, Issue D16 https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008332	journal	January 2007
Long-term ozone changes and associated climate impacts in CMIP5 simulations: OZONE AND ASSOCIATED CLIMATE IMPACTS Eyring, V.; Arblaster, J. M.; Cionni, I. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50316	journal	May 2013
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization Eyring, Veronika; Bony, Sandrine; Meehl, Gerald A. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016	journal	January 2016
ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP Eyring, Veronika; Righi, Mattia; Lauer, Axel Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016	journal	January 2016
Towards improved and more routine Earth system model evaluation in CMIP Eyring, Veronika; Gleckler, Peter J.; Heinze, Christoph Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 7, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-813-2016	journal	January 2016
Evolving Obs4MIPs to Support Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) Ferraro, Robert; Waliser, Duane E.; Gleckler, Peter Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00216.1	journal	August 2015
Global air quality and climate Fiore, Arlene M.; Naik, Vaishali; Spracklen, Dominick V. Chemical Society Reviews, Vol. 41, Issue 19 https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35095e	journal	January 2012
Air Quality and Climate Connections Fiore, Arlene M.; Naik, Vaishali; Leibensperger, Eric M. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 65, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1040526	journal	May 2015
Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6: RECOMMENDED EFFECTIVE RADIATIVE FORCING Forster, Piers M.; Richardson, Thomas; Maycock, Amanda C. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 121, Issue 20 https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025320	journal	October 2016
SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways Fujimori, Shinichiro; Hasegawa, Tomoko; Masui, Toshihiko Global Environmental Change, Vol. 42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009	journal	January 2017
Radiative forcing in the 21st century due to ozone changes in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere: OZONE CHANGE AND RADIATIVE FORCING Gauss, M.; Myhre, G.; Pitari, G. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 108, Issue D9 https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002624	journal	May 2003
Radiative forcing since preindustrial times due to ozone change in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere Gauss, M.; Myhre, G.; Isaksen, I. S. A. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-575-2006	journal	January 2006
Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Comparative Decomposition of Aerosol Direct, Semidirect, and Indirect Radiative Forcing Ghan, S. J.; Liu, X.; Easter, R. C. Journal of Climate, Vol. 25, Issue 19 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00650.1	journal	October 2012
Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability Ghan, Steven; Wang, Minghuai; Zhang, Shipeng Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 21 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514036113	journal	February 2016
The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) contribution to CMIP6 Gillett, Nathan P.; Shiogama, Hideo; Funke, Bernd Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3685-2016	journal	January 2016
A More Powerful Reality Test for Climate Models Gleckler, Peter; Doutriaux, Charles; Durack, Paul Eos, Vol. 97 https://doi.org/10.1029/2016EO051663	journal	May 2016
Reduced anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing caused by biogenic new particle formation Gordon, Hamish; Sengupta, Kamalika; Rap, Alexandru Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 43 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602360113	journal	October 2016
Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period Granier, Claire; Bessagnet, Bertrand; Bond, Tami Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0154-1	journal	August 2011
Large climate-induced changes in ultraviolet index and stratosphere-to-troposphere ozone flux Hegglin, Michaela I.; Shepherd, Theodore G. Nature Geoscience, Vol. 2, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo604	journal	September 2009
The ESA Climate Change Initiative: Satellite Data Records for Essential Climate Variables Hollmann, R.; Merchant, C. J.; Saunders, R. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 94, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00254.1	journal	October 2013
Anthropogenic sulfate aerosol and the southward shift of tropical precipitation in the late 20th century: AEROSOLS AND TROPICAL RAIN BELT SHIFTS Hwang, Yen-Ting; Frierson, Dargan M. W.; Kang, Sarah M. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50502	journal	June 2013
Atmospheric composition change: Climate–Chemistry interactions Isaksen, I. S. A.; Granier, C.; Myhre, G. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, Issue 33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.003	journal	October 2009
Effect of climate change on air quality Jacob, Daniel J.; Winner, Darrell A. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.051	journal	January 2009
Climate versus emission drivers of methane lifetime against loss by tropospheric OH from 1860–2100 John, J. G.; Fiore, A. M.; Naik, V. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 24 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12021-2012	journal	January 2012
C4MIP – The Coupled Climate–Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project: experimental protocol for CMIP6 Jones, Chris D.; Arora, Vivek; Friedlingstein, Pierre Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2853-2016	journal	January 2016
An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models Kinne, S.; Schulz, M.; Textor, C. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006	journal	January 2006
The Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP): overview and description of models, simulations and climate diagnostics Lamarque, J. -F.; Shindell, D. T.; Josse, B. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-179-2013	journal	January 2013
A global three-dimensional model of the tropospheric sulfur cycle Langner, J.; Rodhe, H. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, Vol. 13, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058134	journal	October 1991
The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: rationale and experimental design Lawrence, David M.; Hurtt, George C.; Arneth, Almut Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2973-2016	journal	January 2016
Climatic effects of 1950–2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols – Part 2: Climate response Leibensperger, E. M.; Mickley, L. J.; Jacob, D. J. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3349-2012	journal	January 2012
The roles of aerosol direct and indirect effects in past and future climate change: CLIMATE IMPACT OF AEROSOLS Levy, Hiram; Horowitz, Larry W.; Schwarzkopf, M. Daniel Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50192	journal	May 2013
Implications for climate sensitivity from the response to individual forcings Marvel, Kate; Schmidt, Gavin A.; Miller, Ron L. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2888	journal	December 2015
Natural aerosols explain seasonal and spatial patterns of Southern Ocean cloud albedo McCoy, Daniel T.; Burrows, Susannah M.; Wood, Robert Science Advances, Vol. 1, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500157	journal	July 2015
Separating the Dynamical Effects of Climate Change and Ozone Depletion. Part II: Southern Hemisphere Troposphere McLandress, Charles; Shepherd, Theodore G.; Scinocca, John F. Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3958.1	journal	March 2011
A method for merging nadir-sounding climate records, with an application to the global-mean stratospheric temperature data sets from SSU and AMSU McLandress, C.; Shepherd, T. G.; Jonsson, A. I. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 16 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9271-2015	journal	January 2015
Review of the global models used within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Morgenstern, Olaf; Hegglin, Michaela I.; Rozanov, Eugene Geoscientific Model Development Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2016-199	posted_content	September 2016
Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations Myhre, G.; Samset, B. H.; Schulz, M. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013	journal	January 2013
Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) Naik, V.; Voulgarakis, A.; Fiore, A. M. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5277-2013	journal	January 2013
A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways O’Neill, Brian C.; Kriegler, Elmar; Riahi, Keywan Climatic Change, Vol. 122, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2	journal	October 2013
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 O'Neill, Brian C.; Tebaldi, Claudia; van Vuuren, Detlef P. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016	journal	January 2016
The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): experimental protocol for CMIP6 Pincus, Robert; Forster, Piers M.; Stevens, Bjorn Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3447-2016	journal	January 2016
Stratospheric Ozone Depletion: The Main Driver of Twentieth-Century Atmospheric Circulation Changes in the Southern Hemisphere Polvani, Lorenzo M.; Waugh, Darryn W.; Correa, Gustavo J. P. Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3772.1	journal	February 2011
Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic Pathways Rao, Shilpa; Klimont, Zbigniew; Smith, Steven J. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.012	journal	January 2017
Quantitative evaluation of ozone and selected climate parameters in a set of EMAC simulations Righi, M.; Eyring, V.; Gottschaldt, K. -D. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-733-2015	journal	January 2015
Why Does Aerosol Forcing Control Historical Global-Mean Surface Temperature Change in CMIP5 Models? Rotstayn, Leon D.; Collier, Mark A.; Shindell, Drew T. Journal of Climate, Vol. 28, Issue 17 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00712.1	journal	September 2015
Use of North American and European air quality networks to evaluate global chemistry–climate modeling of surface ozone Schnell, J. L.; Prather, M. J.; Josse, B. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10581-2015	journal	January 2015
Effect of climate change on surface ozone over North America, Europe, and East Asia Schnell, Jordan L.; Prather, Michael J.; Josse, Beatrice Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068060	journal	April 2016
Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations Schulz, M.; Textor, C.; Kinne, S. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006	journal	January 2006
Adjustments in the Forcing-Feedback Framework for Understanding Climate Change Sherwood, Steven C.; Bony, Sandrine; Boucher, Olivier Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00167.1	journal	February 2015
Inhomogeneous forcing and transient climate sensitivity Shindell, Drew T. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2136	journal	March 2014
Improved Attribution of Climate Forcing to Emissions Shindell, D. T.; Faluvegi, G.; Koch, D. M. Science, Vol. 326, Issue 5953 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174760	journal	October 2009
Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security Shindell, D.; Kuylenstierna, J. C. I.; Vignati, E. Science, Vol. 335, Issue 6065 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210026	journal	January 2012
Precipitation response to regional radiative forcing Shindell, D. T.; Voulgarakis, A.; Faluvegi, G. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 15 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6969-2012	journal	January 2012
Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations Shindell, D. T.; Lamarque, J. -F.; Schulz, M. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2939-2013	journal	January 2013
Attribution of historical ozone forcing to anthropogenic emissions Shindell, Drew; Faluvegi, Greg; Nazarenko, Larissa Nature Climate Change, Vol. 3, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1835	journal	March 2013
Interactive ozone and methane chemistry in GISS-E2 historical and future climate simulations Shindell, D. T.; Pechony, O.; Voulgarakis, A. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2653-2013	journal	January 2013
A comparison of model-simulated trends in stratospheric temperatures Shine, K. P.; Bourqui, M. S.; Forster, P. M. de F. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 129, Issue 590 https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.186	journal	April 2003
Anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions: 1850–2005 Smith, S. J.; van Aardenne, J.; Klimont, Z. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1101-2011	journal	January 2011
The Impact of Stratospheric Ozone Recovery on the Southern Hemisphere Westerly Jet Son, S. -W.; Polvani, L. M.; Waugh, D. W. Science, Vol. 320, Issue 5882 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155939	journal	June 2008
Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone Stevenson, D. S.; Dentener, F. J.; Schultz, M. G. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, Issue D8 https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006338	journal	January 2006
Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) Stevenson, D. S.; Young, P. J.; Naik, V. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3063-2013	journal	January 2013
Satellite Observations for CMIP5: The Genesis of Obs4MIPs Teixeira, Joao; Waliser, Duane; Ferraro, Robert Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 95, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00204.1	journal	September 2014
Potential impacts of Asian carbon aerosols on future US warming: ASIAN CARBON AEROSOLS & U.S. WARMING Teng, Haiyan; Washington, Warren M.; Branstator, Grant Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051723	journal	June 2012
Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom Textor, C.; Schulz, M.; Guibert, S. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006	journal	January 2006
A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Kriegler, Elmar; O’Neill, Brian C. Climatic Change, Vol. 122, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1	journal	October 2013
Analysis of present day and future OH and methane lifetime in the ACCMIP simulations Voulgarakis, A.; Naik, V.; Lamarque, J. -F. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2563-2013	journal	January 2013
Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) Young, P. J.; Archibald, A. T.; Bowman, K. W. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013	journal	January 2013
Anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions: 1850–2005 Smith, S. J.; van Aardenne, J.; Klimont, Z. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 10, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-16111-2010	journal	January 2010
Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) Young, P. J.; Archibald, A. T.; Bowman, K. W. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 12, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-21615-2012	journal	January 2012
An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models Kinne, S.; Schulz, M.; Textor, C. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 5, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-5-8285-2005	journal	January 2005
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organisation Eyring, V.; Bony, S.; Meehl, G. A. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 8, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-8-10539-2015	journal	January 2015
ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth System Models in CMIP Eyring, V.; Righi, M.; Evaldsson, M. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 8, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-8-7541-2015	journal	January 2015
Stratospheric Ozone Depletion: The Main Driver of Twentieth-Century Atmospheric Circulation Changes in the Southern Hemisphere Polvani, Lorenzo M.; Waugh, Darryn W.; Correa, Gustavo P. Columbia University https://doi.org/10.7916/d86h4tjp	text	January 2011
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 O'Neill, Brian C.; Tebaldi, Claudia; Van Vuuren, Detlef P. ETH Zurich https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000121420	text	January 2016
Review of the global models used within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Olaf, Morgenstern,; I., Hegglin, Michaela; Eugene, Rozanov, ETH Zurich https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000123936	text	January 2017
Precipitation response to regional radiative forcing Shindell, D. T.; Voulgarakis, A.; Faluvegi, G. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-5015-2012	posted_content	February 2012
Historical (1750 - 2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emission Data System (CEDS) Hoesly, Rachel M.; Smith, Steven J.; Feng, Leyang EGU https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-43	preprint	March 2017
Development and evaluation of an Earth-system model – HadGEM2 Collins, W. J.; Bellouin, N.; Doutriaux-Boucher, M. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 4, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-4-997-2011	journal	January 2011
Drivers of changes in stratospheric and tropospheric ozone between year 2000 and 2100 Banerjee, A.; Maycock, A. C.; Archibald, A. T. Karlsruhe https://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000057619	text	January 2016
A method for merging nadir-sounding climate records, with an application to the global-mean stratospheric temperature data sets from SSU and AMSU McLandress, C.; Shepherd, T. G.; Jonsson, A. I. Karlsruhe https://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000058017	text	January 2015
Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone Schultz, M. G.; Ellingsen, K.; Van Noije, T. P. C. Columbia University https://doi.org/10.7916/d80v8cf2	text	January 2006
The ESA Climate Change Initiative: Satellite data records for essential climate variables Hollmann, Rainer; Merchant, Chris J.; Saunders, Roger American Meteorological Society https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-93038	text	January 2013
Quantitative evaluation of ozone and selected climate parameters in a set of EMAC simulations Righi, M.; Eyring, V.; Gottschaldt, K. -D. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-6549-2014	posted_content	October 2014
The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: Rationale and experimental design Lawrence, David M.; Hurtt, George C.; Arneth, Almut Karlsruhe https://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000060650	text	January 2016
Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations Shindell, D. T.; Lamarque, J. -F.; Schulz, M. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 12, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-21105-2012	journal	January 2012
Interactive ozone and methane chemistry in GISS-E2 historical and future climate simulations Shindell, D. T.; Pechony, O.; Voulgarakis, A. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 12, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-23513-2012	journal	January 2012
Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) Hoesly, Rachel M.; Smith, Steven J.; Feng, Leyang Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018	journal	January 2018
An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models Kinne, Stefan; Schulz, Michael; Textor, C. ETH Zurich https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000024265	text	January 2006
Drivers of changes in stratospheric and tropospheric ozone between year 2000 and 2100 Banerjee, A.; Maycock, A. C.; Archibald, A. T. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-30645-2015	posted_content	November 2015
Radiative forcing since preindustrial times due to ozone change in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere Gauss, M.; Myhre, G.; Isaksen, I. S. A. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-5-5751-2005	posted_content	August 2205
Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) Naik, Vaishali; Voulgarakis, A.; Fiore, Arlene M. Columbia University https://doi.org/10.7916/d8833rn9	text	January 2013
ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP Eyring, Veronika; Righi, Mattia; Lauer, Axel Copernicus Publications https://doi.org/10.48350/167138	text	January 2016
Climate versus emission drivers of methane lifetime against loss by tropospheric OH from 1860–2100 John, J. G.; Fiore, Arlene M.; Naik, V. Columbia University https://doi.org/10.7916/d89s21wk	text	January 2012
Effect of stratosphere-troposphere exchange on the future tropospheric ozone trend Collins, W. J. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 108, Issue D12 https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002617	journal	January 2003
Lifetimes and eigenstates in atmospheric chemistry Prather, Michael J. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 21, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1029/94gl00840	journal	May 1994
Results from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change Photochemical Model Intercomparison (PhotoComp) Olson, Jennifer; Prather, Michael; Berntsen, Terje Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 102, Issue D5 https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd03380	journal	March 1997
The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) contribution to CMIP6 Gillett, Nathan P.; Shiogama, Hideo; Funke, Bernd ETH Zurich https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000121875	text	January 2016

Cited By (43)

Reassessment of pre-industrial fire emissions strongly affects anthropogenic aerosol forcing Hamilton, D. S.; Hantson, S.; Scott, C. E. Nature Communications, Vol. 9, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05592-9	journal	August 2018
Emerging Asian aerosol patterns Samset, Bjørn H.; Lund, Marianne T.; Bollasina, Massimo Nature Geoscience, Vol. 12, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0424-5	journal	July 2019
Future ozone-related acute excess mortality under climate and population change scenarios in China: A modeling study Chen, Kai; Fiore, Arlene M.; Chen, Renjie PLOS Medicine, Vol. 15, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002598	journal	July 2018
Global atmospheric chemistry – which air matters Prather, Michael J.; Zhu, Xin; Flynn, Clare M. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9081-2017	journal	January 2017
Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses Westervelt, Daniel M.; Conley, Andrew J.; Fiore, Arlene M. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 16 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12461-2018	journal	January 2018
Strong impacts on aerosol indirect effects from historical oxidant changes Karset, Inger Helene Hafsahl; Berntsen, Terje Koren; Storelvmo, Trude Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7669-2018	journal	January 2018
Clear-sky ultraviolet radiation modelling using output from the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative Lamy, Kévin; Portafaix, Thierry; Josse, Béatrice Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 15 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10087-2019	journal	January 2019
Significant climate impacts of aerosol changes driven by growth in energy use and advances in emission control technology Zhao, Alcide; Bollasina, Massimo A.; Crippa, Monica Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 23 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14517-2019	journal	January 2019
Aerosol optical properties over Europe: an evaluation of the AQMEII Phase 3 simulations against satellite observations Palacios-Peña, Laura; Jiménez-Guerrero, Pedro; Baró, Rocío Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2965-2019	journal	January 2019
Ozone and carbon monoxide observations over open oceans on R/V Mirai from 67° S to 75° N during 2012 to 2017: testing global chemical reanalysis in terms of Arctic processes, low ozone levels at low latitudes, and pollution transport Kanaya, Yugo; Miyazaki, Kazuyuki; Taketani, Fumikazu Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7233-2019	journal	January 2019
How well can global chemistry models calculate the reactivity of short-lived greenhouse gases in the remote troposphere, knowing the chemical composition Prather, Michael J.; Flynn, Clare M.; Zhu, Xin Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 11, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2653-2018	journal	January 2018
ESD Reviews: Climate feedbacks in the Earth system and prospects for their evaluation Heinze, Christoph; Eyring, Veronika; Friedlingstein, Pierre Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 10, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-379-2019	journal	January 2019
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations Otto-Bliesner, Bette L.; Braconnot, Pascale; Harrison, Sandy P. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017	journal	January 2017
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 4: Scientific objectives and experimental design of the PMIP4-CMIP6 Last Glacial Maximum experiments and PMIP4 sensitivity experiments Kageyama, Masa; Albani, Samuel; Braconnot, Pascale Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4035-2017	journal	January 2017
Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Morgenstern, Olaf; Hegglin, Michaela I.; Rozanov, Eugene Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017	journal	January 2017
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan Kageyama, Masa; Braconnot, Pascale; Harrison, Sandy P. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018	journal	January 2018
The impact of precipitation evaporation on the atmospheric aerosol distribution in EC-Earth v3.2.0 de Bruine, Marco; Krol, Maarten; van Noije, Twan Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1443-2018	journal	January 2018
The Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP): motivation and experimental design Timmreck, Claudia; Mann, Graham W.; Aquila, Valentina Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018	journal	January 2018
Quasi-Newton methods for atmospheric chemistry simulations: implementation in UKCA UM vn10.8 Esentürk, Emre; Abraham, Nathan Luke; Archer-Nicholls, Scott Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3089-2018	journal	January 2018
Using a virtual machine environment for developing, testing, and training for the UM-UKCA composition-climate model, using Unified Model version 10.9 and above Abraham, Nathan Luke; Archibald, Alexander T.; Cresswell, Paul Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3647-2018	journal	January 2018
The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification Smith, Doug M.; Screen, James A.; Deser, Clara Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1139-2019	journal	January 2019
Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century Gidden, Matthew J.; Riahi, Keywan; Smith, Steven J. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1443-2019	journal	January 2019
The Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model (BCC-CSM): the main progress from CMIP5 to CMIP6 Wu, Tongwen; Lu, Yixiong; Fang, Yongjie Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1573-2019	journal	January 2019
The CMIP6 Data Request (DREQ, version 01.00.31) Juckes, Martin; Taylor, Karl E.; Durack, Paul J. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-201-2020	journal	January 2020
The generation of gridded emissions data for CMIP6 Feng, Leyang; Smith, Steven J.; Braun, Caleb Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-461-2020	journal	January 2020
The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): experimental protocol for CMIP6 Pincus, Robert; Forster, Piers M.; Stevens, Bjorn Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3447-2016	journal	January 2016
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 O'Neill, Brian C.; Tebaldi, Claudia; Van Vuuren, Detlef P. ETH Zurich https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000121420	text	January 2016
Using a Virtual Machine environment for developing, testing, and training for the UM-UKCA Composition-Climate Model, using Unified Model version 10.9 and above Luke, Nathan Geoscientific Model Development Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-125	journal	May 2018
The Dynamics and Variability Model Intercomparison Project (DynVarMIP) for CMIP6: assessing the stratosphere–troposphere system Gerber, Edwin P.; Manzini, Elisa Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3413-2016	journal	January 2016
Reassessment of pre-industrial fire emissions strongly affects anthropogenic aerosol forcing Hamilton, D. S.; Hantson, S.; Scott, C. E. Karlsruhe https://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000085737	text	January 2018
ESD Reviews: Climate feedbacks in the Earth system and prospects for their evaluation Heinze, Christoph; Eyring, Veronika; Friedlingstein, Pierre ETH Zurich https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000354206	text	January 2019
Aerosol optical properties over Europe: an evaluation of the AQMEII Phase 3 simulations against satellite observations Palacios-Peña, Laura; Jiménez-Guerrero, Pedro; Baró, Rocío Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-1119	posted_content	March 2018
The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification Smith, Doug; Screen, James; Deser, Clara Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4282286	text	January 2019
How well can global chemistry models calculate the reactivity of short-lived greenhouse gases in the remote troposphere, knowing the chemical composition Prather, Michael J.; Flynn, Clare M.; Zhu, Xin Columbia University https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-9b4x-b818	text	January 2018
Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Morgenstern, Olaf; Hegglin, Michaela I.; Rozanov, Eugene ETH Zurich https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000128835	text	January 2017
The Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP): motivation and experimental design Timmreck, Claudia; Mann, Graham W.; Aquila, Valentina ETH Zurich https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000277280	text	January 2018
Quasi-Newton Methods for Atmospheric Chemistry Simulations: Implementation in UKCA UM Vn10.8 Esenturk, Emre; Abraham, Luke; Archer-Nicholls, Scott Geoscientific Model Development Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-32	posted_content	February 2018
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 O'Neill, Brian C.; Tebaldi, Claudia; van Vuuren, Detlef P. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016	journal	January 2016
The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification Smith, Doug; Screen, James; Deser, Clara Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4282287	text	January 2019
Clear-sky ultraviolet radiation modelling using output from the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative Lamy, Kévin; Portafaix, Thierry; Josse, Béatrice Karlsruhe https://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000097983	text	January 2019
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan Kageyama, Masa; Braconnot, Pascale; Harrison, Sandy P. Copernicus Publications https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.116300	text	January 2018
Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Morgenstern, O.; Hegglin, M.; Rozanov, E. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.8165	text	January 2017
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations Dutton, Andrea; Peterschmitt, Jean-Yves; Bartlein, Patrick J. Copernicus Publications https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.106908	text	January 2017

Linked Research (2)

Similar Records

C4MIP – The Coupled Climate–Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project: Experimental protocol for CMIP6

Journal Article · Thu Aug 25 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Geoscientific Model Development (Online) · OSTI ID:1349156

Jones, Chris D.; Arora, Vivek; Friedlingstein, Pierre; +14 more

The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): Experimental protocol for CMIP6

Journal Article · Tue Sep 27 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Geoscientific Model Development (Online) · OSTI ID:1349156

Pincus, Robert; Forster, Piers M.; Stevens, Bjorn

Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization

Journal Article · Thu May 26 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Geoscientific Model Development (Online) · OSTI ID:1349156

Eyring, Veronika; Bony, Sandrine; Meehl, Gerald A.; +4 more

Related Subjects

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

NIWA UKESM1.0-LL model output prepared for CMIP6 AerChemMIP Dalvi, Mohit; Abraham, Luke; Archibald, Alex https://doi.org/10.22033/esgf/cmip6.1741 The current record documents this dataset	dataset	January 2019
NIWA UKESM1.0-LL model output prepared for CMIP6 AerChemMIP Dalvi, Mohit; Abraham, Luke; Archibald, Alex https://doi.org/10.22033/esgf/cmip6.1741 The current record is a supplement to this dataset	dataset	January 2019