skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Drop-in biofuel production via conventional (lipid/fatty acid) and advanced (biomass) routes. Part I

Journal Article · · Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1746· OSTI ID:1346341
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC (Canada)
  2. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

Drop-in biofuels that are 'functionally identical to petroleum fuels and fully compatible with existing infrastructure' are needed for sectors such as aviation where biofuels such as bioethanol/biodiesel cannot be used. The technologies used to produce drop-in biofuels can be grouped into the four categories: oleochemical, thermochemical, biochemical, and hybrid technologies. Commercial volumes of conventional drop-in biofuels are currently produced through the oleochemical pathway, to make products such as renewable diesel and biojet fuel. However, the cost, sustainability, and availability of the lipid/fatty acid feedstocks are significant challenges that need to be addressed. In the longer-term, it is likely that commercial growth in drop-in biofuels will be based on lignocellulosic feedstocks. However, these technologies have been slow to develop and have been hampered by several technoeconomic challenges. For example, the gasification/Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis route suffers from high capital costs and economies of scale difficulties, while the economical production of high quality syngas remains a significant challenge. Although pyrolysis/hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) based technologies are promising, the upgrading of pyrolysis oils to higher specification fuels has encountered several technical challenges, such as high catalyst cost and short catalyst lifespan. Biochemical routes to drop-in fuels have the advantage of producing single molecules with simple chemistry. Moreover, the high value of these molecules in other markets such as renewable chemical precursors and fragrances will limit their use for fuel. In the near-term, (1-5 years) it is likely that, 'conventional' drop-in biofuels will be produced predominantly via the oleochemical route, due to the relative simplicity and maturity of this pathway.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Sustainable Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
1346341
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5100-67681
Journal Information:
Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, Vol. 11, Issue 2; ISSN 1932-104X
Publisher:
WileyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 58 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (22)

Catalytic conversion of biomass-derived feedstocks into olefins and aromatics with ZSM-5: the hydrogen to carbon effective ratio journal January 2011
Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading journal March 2012
Biomass-derived syngas fermentation into biofuels: Opportunities and challenges journal July 2010
Renewable Alkanes by Aqueous-Phase Reforming of Biomass-Derived Oxygenates journal March 2004
Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways journal November 2010
Gasification book March 2011
Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks journal January 2008
Trends and challenges in the microbial production of lignocellulosic bioalcohol fuels journal June 2010
Progress in the production and application of n-butanol as a biofuel journal October 2011
Commercial Biomass Syngas Fermentation journal December 2012
Synthesis of Transportation Fuels from Biomass: Chemistry, Catalysts, and Engineering journal September 2006
Beyond Petrochemicals: The Renewable Chemicals Industry journal October 2011
Second-generation biofuels: why they are taking so long: Second-generation biofuels journal December 2012
Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water journal August 2002
Effect of increased hydrogen partial pressure on the acetone-butanol fermentation by Clostridium acetobutylicum journal June 1985
Hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil-vegetable oil mixtures for biofuels production journal June 2009
Reactor Design Issues for Synthesis-Gas Fermentations journal October 1999
An overview of aqueous-phase catalytic processes for production of hydrogen and alkanes in a biorefinery journal January 2006
Syngas Cleanup, Conditioning, and Utilization book March 2011
Renewable Alkanes by Aqueous-Phase Reforming of Biomass-Derived Oxygenates journal March 2004
Second-Generation Biofuels: Why They are Taking so Long book December 2015
Synthesis of Transportation Fuels from Biomass: Chemistry, Catalysts, and Engineering journal December 2006

Cited By (3)

Potential synergies of drop‐in biofuel production with further co‐processing at oil refineries journal December 2018
(Solid + liquid) equilibrium of binary mixtures containing ethyl esters and p-xylene by differential scanning calorimetry
  • Bessa, Larissa Castello Branco Almeida; Robustillo, Maria Dolores; Meirelles, Antonio José de Almeida
  • Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol. 137, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08085-z
journal March 2019
Simultaneous lipid biosynthesis and recovery for oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica journal October 2019