skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Quantifying model-structure- and parameter-driven uncertainties in spring wheat phenology prediction with Bayesian analysis

Journal Article · · European Journal of Agronomy
 [1];  [2]
  1. Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK (United States); International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (Mexico)
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), QLD (Australia)

Recent international efforts have brought renewed emphasis on the comparison of different agricultural systems models. Thus far, analysis of model-ensemble simulated results has not clearly differentiated between ensemble prediction uncertainties due to model structural differences per se and those due to parameter value uncertainties. Additionally, despite increasing use of Bayesian parameter estimation approaches with field-scale crop models, inadequate attention has been given to the full posterior distributions for estimated parameters. The objectives of this study were to quantify the impact of parameter value uncertainty on prediction uncertainty for modeling spring wheat phenology using Bayesian analysis and to assess the relative contributions of model-structure-driven and parameter-value-driven uncertainty to overall prediction uncertainty. This study used a random walk Metropolis algorithm to estimate parameters for 30 spring wheat genotypes using nine phenology models based on multi-location trial data for days to heading and days to maturity. Across all cases, parameter-driven uncertainty accounted for between 19 and 52% of predictive uncertainty, while model-structure-driven uncertainty accounted for between 12 and 64%. Here, this study demonstrated the importance of quantifying both model-structure- and parameter-value-driven uncertainty when assessing overall prediction uncertainty in modeling spring wheat phenology. More generally, Bayesian parameter estimation provided a useful framework for quantifying and analyzing sources of prediction uncertainty.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
OIA-1301789; OCI1126330; AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1335863
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-116887; PII: S1161030116301800
Journal Information:
European Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 88; ISSN 1161-0301
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 20 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (29)

Adapting the CSM-CROPGRO model for pigeonpea using sequential parameter estimation journal September 2015
A methodology and an optimization tool to calibrate phenology of short-day species included in the APSIM PLANT model: Application to soybean journal December 2014
Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change journal June 2013
Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production journal December 2014
Adapting the CROPGRO Legume Model to Simulate Growth of Faba Bean journal July 2002
An augmented Arabidopsis phenology model reveals seasonal temperature control of flowering time journal February 2012
Multi-metric evaluation of the models WARM, CropSyst, and WOFOST for rice journal June 2009
Parameter and uncertainty estimation for maize, peanut and cotton using the SALUS crop model journal May 2015
Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences journal November 1992
Using a mathematical framework to examine physiological changes in winter wheat after livestock grazing journal September 2012
A model driven by crop water use and nitrogen supply for simulating changes in the regional yield of rain-fed lowland rice in Northeast Thailand journal January 2008
Influence of likelihood function choice for estimating crop model parameters using the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method journal June 2010
GENCALC: Software to Facilitate the Use of Crop Models for Analyzing Field Experiments journal September 1993
Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis of a large-scale crop model for paddy rice: Application of a Bayesian approach journal February 2009
A comparison of the models AFRCWHEAT2, CERES-Wheat, Sirius, SUCROS2 and SWHEAT with measurements from wheat grown under drought journal January 1998
Reconciling alternative models of phenological development in winter wheat journal July 2007
Using a Bayesian approach to parameter estimation; comparison of the GLUE and MCMC methods journal March 2002
Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one journal December 2014
Photoperiod and Vernalization Effect on Anthesis Date in Winter‐Sown Spring Wheat Regions journal July 2013
Comparison of the wheat simulation models Afrcwheat2, Ceres-wheat and Swheat for non-limiting conditions of crop growth journal April 1993
Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: a review journal January 1999
Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms journal February 1997
The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies journal March 2013
Crop Model Calibration: A Statistical Perspective journal July 2011
Estimating model prediction error: Should you treat predictions as fixed or random? journal October 2016
Simulation of phenological development of wheat crops journal September 1998
Simulation-Based Analysis of Effects of Vrn and Ppd Loci on Flowering in Wheat journal March 2008
Responses of time of anthesis and maturity to sowing dates and infrared warming in spring wheat journal November 2011
Quantification of the effects of VRN1 and Ppd-D1 to predict spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) heading time across diverse environments journal July 2013

Cited By (1)

Role of Modelling in International Crop Research: Overview and Some Case Studies journal December 2018