Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

A Physical Basis for Ms-Yield Scaling in Hard Rock and Implications for Late-Time Damage of the Source Medium

Journal Article · · Geophysical Journal International
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw140· OSTI ID:1335620
 [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)

Surface wave magnitude Ms for a compilation of 72 nuclear tests detonated in hard rock media for which yields and burial depths have been reported in the literature is shown to scale with yield W as a + b × log[W], where a = 2.50 ± 0.08 and b = 0.80 ± 0.05. While the exponent b is consistent with an Ms scaling model for fully coupled, normal containment-depth explosions, the intercept a is offset 0.45 magnitude units lower than the model. The cause of offset is important to understand in terms of the explosion source. Hard rock explosions conducted in extensional and compressional stress regimes show similar offsets, an indication that the tectonic setting in which an explosion occurs plays no role causing the offset. The scaling model accounts for the effects of source medium material properties on the generation of 20-s period Rayleigh wave amplitudes. Aided by thorough characterizations of the explosion and tectonic release sources, an extensive analysis of the 1963 October 26 Shoal nuclear test detonated in granite 27 miles southeast of Fallon NV shows that the offset is consistent with the predictions of a material damage source model related to non-linear stress wave interactions with the free surface. This source emits Rayleigh waves with polarity opposite to waves emitted by the explosion. The Shoal results were extended to analyse surface waves from the 1962 February 15 Hardhat nuclear test, the 1988 September 14 Soviet Joint Verification Experiment, and the anomalous 1979 August 18 northeast Balapan explosion which exhibits opposite polarity, azimuth-independent source component U1 compared to an explosion. Modelling these tests shows that Rayleigh wave amplitudes generated by the damage source are nearly as large as or larger than amplitudes from the explosion. As such, destructive interference can be drastic, introducing metastable conditions due to the sensitivity of reduced amplitudes to Rayleigh wave initial phase angles of the explosion and damage sources. This meta-stability is a likely source of scatter in Ms-yield scaling observations. The agreement of observed scaling exponent b with the model suggests that the damage source strength does not vary much with yield, in contrast to explosions conducted in weak media where Ms scaling rates are greater than the model predicts, and the yield dependence of the damage source strength is significant. This difference in scaling behaviour is a consequence of source medium material properties.

Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
OSTI ID:
1335620
Report Number(s):
LA--UR-15-28695
Journal Information:
Geophysical Journal International, Journal Name: Geophysical Journal International Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 206; ISSN 0956-540X
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (31)

Chemical Explosion Experiments to Improve Nuclear Test Monitoring journal July 2013
Seismic source functions from free-field ground motions recorded on SPE: Implications for source models of small, shallow explosions: EXPLOSION SOURCE FUNCTIONS journal May 2015
Shallow Velocity Structure at the Shagan River Test Site in Kazakhstan journal October 2001
Yield Estimation from Surface-wave Amplitudes journal October 2001
Effects of shock-induced tensile failure on m b - M s discrimination: Contrasts between historic nuclear explosions and the North Korean test of 9 October 2006 journal January 2008
Identifying isotropic events using a regional moment tensor inversion: ISOTROPIC EVENTS journal January 2009
The apparent explosion moment: Inferences of volumetric moment due to source medium damage by underground nuclear explosions journal January 2011
Can teleseismic m b be affected by rock damage around explosions? journal January 2013
An explanation for apparent time delays in phase-reversed Rayleigh waves from underground nuclear explosions journal December 1986
Tectonic release from the Soviet Joint Verification Experiment journal September 1990
The explosion seismic source function: Models and scaling laws reviewed book January 1991
Body wave observations of tectonic release book January 1991
Surface wave radiation patterns for underground nuclear explosions and small-magnitude earthquakes journal September 1963
A note on surface waves from the hardhat nuclear explosion journal March 1964
Determination of source parameters by amplitude equalization of seismic surface waves: 2. Release of tectonic strain by underground nuclear explosions and mechanisms of earthquakes journal February 1965
Surface Waves from Underground Explosions journal November 1971
Comparison of seismic and hydrodynamic yield determinations for the Soviet joint verification experiment of 1988 journal May 1989
Source Time Functions and Spectra for Underground Nuclear Explosions journal December 1972
Tectonic Strain Release by Underground Nuclear Explosions and its Effect on Seismic Discrimination journal December 1972
Discrimination Between Earthquakes and Underground Explosions Employing an Improved Ms Scale journal June 1972
A Comparative Study of the Elastic Wave Radiation from Earthquakes and Underground Explosions journal October 1972
Magnitude corrections for attenuation in the upper mantle journal June 1979
Seismic yield determination of Soviet underground nuclear explosions at the Shagan River test site journal April 1992
Empirical Measurements of Tectonic Moment Release In Nuclear Explosions From Teleseismic Surface Waves and Body Waves journal April 1994
Seismic Source Summary for All U.S. Below-Surface Nuclear Explosions journal June 2002
mb:Ms Event Screening Revisited journal February 2012
Modeling Ms-Yield Scaling of Nevada Test Site Nuclear Explosions for Constraints on Volumetric Moment due to Source-Medium Damage journal August 2012
Advanced Seismic Analyses of the Source Characteristics of the 2006 and 2009 North Korean Nuclear Tests journal June 2013
Comment on "Advanced Seismic Analyses of the Source Characteristics of the 2006 and 2009 North Korean Nuclear Tests" by J. R. Murphy, J. L. Stevens, B. C. Kohl, and T. J. Bennett journal July 2014
3D Numerical Modeling of Tectonic Strain Release from Explosions journal January 2015
Review of geomechanics data from French nuclear explosions in the Hoggar granite, with some comparisons to tests in US granite report May 1983

Cited By (1)

Vertical force scaling in seismic source models of underground nuclear explosions journal January 2020

Similar Records

Surface-wave generation by underground nuclear explosions releasing tectonic strain
Technical Report · Sun Nov 02 23:00:00 EST 1980 · OSTI ID:6720433

Vertical force scaling in seismic source models of underground nuclear explosions
Journal Article · Tue Jan 07 23:00:00 EST 2020 · Geophysical Journal International · OSTI ID:1595509