Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy&nbsp;costs

Wiser, Ryan; Jenni, Karen; Seel, Joachim; Baker, Erin; Hand, Maureen; Lantz, Eric; Smith, Aaron

doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.135

Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs

Journal Article · Mon Sep 12 04:00:00 EDT 2016 · Nature Energy

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.135· OSTI ID:1325512

Wiser, Ryan ^[1]; Jenni, Karen ^[2]; Seel, Joachim ^[1]; Baker, Erin ^[3]; Hand, Maureen ^[4]; Lantz, Eric ^[4]; Smith, Aaron ^[4]

Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Insight Decisions, LLC, Denver, CO (United States)
Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (United States)
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

Wind energy supply has grown rapidly over the last decade. However, the long-term contribution of wind to future energy supply, and the degree to which policy support is necessary to motivate higher levels of deployment, depends -- in part -- on the future costs of both onshore and offshore wind. Here, we summarize the results of an expert elicitation survey of 163 of the world's foremost wind experts, aimed at better understanding future costs and technology advancement possibilities. Results suggest significant opportunities for cost reductions, but also underlying uncertainties. Under the median scenario, experts anticipate 24-30% reductions by 2030 and 35-41% reductions by 2050 across the three wind applications studied. Costs could be even lower: experts predict a 10% chance that reductions will be more than 40% by 2030 and more than 50% by 2050. Insights gained through expert elicitation complement other tools for evaluating cost-reduction potential, and help inform policy and planning, R&D and industry strategy.

Research Organization:: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Wind Energy Technologies Office (EE-4WE); International Energy Agency Wind (IEA Wind), Indianapolis, IN (United States); National Science Foundation (NSF)

DOE Contract Number:: AC02-05CH11231

OSTI ID:: 1325512

Report Number(s):: NREL/JA--6A20-66669

Journal Information:: Nature Energy, Journal Name: Nature Energy Journal Issue: 10 Vol. 1; ISSN 2058-7546

Publisher:: Nature Publishing Group

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

References (46)

Mitigation strategies and energy technology learning: An assessment with the POLES model Criqui, P.; Mima, S.; Menanteau, P. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.005	journal	January 2015
The role of renewable energy in climate stabilization: results from the EMF27 scenarios Luderer, Gunnar; Krey, Volker; Calvin, Katherine Climatic Change, Vol. 123, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0924-z	journal	October 2013
Upscaling wind turbines: theoretical and practical aspects and their impact on the cost of energy: Upscaling wind turbines: theoretical and practical aspects Sieros, G.; Chaviaropoulos, P.; Sørensen, J. D. Wind Energy, Vol. 15, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/we.527	journal	January 2012
‘The future costs of nuclear power using multiple expert elicitations: effects of RD&D and elicitation design Diaz Anadon, Laura; Nemet, Gf; Verdolini, E. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.30132	text	January 2018
An Analysis of Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman's Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases Morvan, Camille; Jenkins, William J. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912282562	book	July 2017
Technology learning in the presence of public R&D: The case of European wind power Ek, Kristina; Söderholm, Patrik Ecological Economics, Vol. 69, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.002	journal	October 2010
Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generating Technologies Joskow, Paul L. American Economic Review, Vol. 101, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.238	journal	May 2011
Learning curves for emerging energy technologies Mukora, A.; Winksel, M.; Jeffrey, H. F. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Energy, Vol. 162, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1680/ener.2009.162.4.151	journal	November 2009
The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing Arrow, K. J. Readings in the Theory of Growth https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15430-2_11	book	January 1971
Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US CO2 emissions MacDonald, Alexander E.; Clack, Christopher T. M.; Alexander, Anneliese Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2921	journal	January 2016
Wind Turbine Design Cost and Scaling Model Fingersh, L.; Hand, M.; Laxson, A. https://doi.org/10.2172/897434	report	December 2006
Bending the learning curve Witajewski-Baltvilks, Jan; Verdolini, Elena; Tavoni, Massimo Energy Economics, Vol. 52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.09.007	journal	December 2015
Offshore wind investments – Realism about cost developments is necessary Schwanitz, Valeria Jana; Wierling, August Energy, Vol. 106 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.046	journal	July 2016
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy Morgan, M. G. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 20 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319946111	journal	May 2014
Technology Improvement Opportunities for Low Wind Speed Turbines and Implications for Cost of Energy Reduction Cohen, J.; Schweizer, T.; Laxson, A. https://doi.org/10.2172/1219451	report	February 2008
Quantifying the Effects of Expert Selection and Elicitation Design on Experts' Confidence in Their Judgments About Future Energy Technologies. Nemet, Gregory F.; Anadon, Laura Diaz; Verdolini, Elena Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.30691	text	January 2017
Cost reductions for offshore wind power: Exploring the balance between scaling, learning and R&D van der Zwaan, Bob; Rivera-Tinoco, Rodrigo; Lensink, Sander Renewable Energy, Vol. 41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.11.014	journal	May 2012
Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: A component-learning hypothesis Ferioli, F.; Schoots, K.; van der Zwaan, B. C. C. Energy Policy, Vol. 37, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.043	journal	July 2009
Wind power learning rates: A conceptual review and meta-analysis Lindman, Åsa; Söderholm, Patrik Energy Economics, Vol. 34, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.05.007	journal	May 2012
On the economics of renewable energy sources Edenhofer, Ottmar; Hirth, Lion; Knopf, Brigitte Energy Economics, Vol. 40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.015	journal	December 2013
The Future Costs of Nuclear Power Using Multiple Expert Elicitations: Effects of RD&D and Elicitation Design Diaz Anadon, Laura; Nemet, Gregory F.; Verdolini, Elena SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2340485	journal	January 2013
A stakeholder analysis of divergent supply-chain trends for the European onshore and offshore wind installations Wüstemeyer, Christoph; Madlener, Reinhard; Bunn, Derek W. Energy Policy, Vol. 80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.017	journal	May 2015
Economies of scale, learning effects and offshore wind development costs Dismukes, David E.; Upton, Gregory B. Renewable Energy, Vol. 83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.002	journal	November 2015
A review of uncertainties in technology experience curves Yeh, Sonia; Rubin, Edward S. Energy Economics, Vol. 34, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.006	journal	May 2012
Branch technical position on the use of expert elicitation in the high-level radioactive waste program Kotra, J. P.; Lee, M. P.; Eisenberg, N. A. https://doi.org/10.2172/414310	report	November 1996
A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies Rubin, Edward S.; Azevedo, Inês M. L.; Jaramillo, Paulina Energy Policy, Vol. 86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.011	journal	November 2015
Technological Learning in the Energy Sector: Lessons for Policy, Industry and Science Junginger, Martin; van Sark, Wilfried; Faaij, André https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806848	book	September 2010
Cost development of future technologies for power generation—A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments Neij, Lena Energy Policy, Vol. 36, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.029	journal	June 2008
Meta-analysis of high penetration renewable energy scenarios Cochran, Jaquelin; Mai, Trieu; Bazilian, Morgan Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.089	journal	January 2014
Expert Assessments of Future Photovoltaic Technologies Curtright, Aimee E.; Morgan, M. Granger; Keith, David W. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 42, Issue 24 https://doi.org/10.1021/es8014088	journal	December 2008
The future costs of nuclear power using multiple expert elicitations: effects of RD&D and elicitation design Anadón, Laura Díaz; Nemet, Gregory; Verdolini, Elena Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 8, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034020	journal	August 2013
Probabilistic decision model of wind power investment and influence of green power market Gillenwater, Michael Energy Policy, Vol. 63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.049	journal	December 2013
The effects of expert selection, elicitation design, and R&D assumptions on experts' estimates of the future costs of photovoltaics Verdolini, Elena; Anadon, Laura Diaz; Lu, Jiaqi Energy Policy, Vol. 80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.006	journal	May 2015
The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure Knol, Anne B.; Slottje, Pauline; van der Sluijs, Jeroen P. Environmental Health, Vol. 9, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-9-19	journal	April 2010
The Perils of the Learning Model For Modeling Endogenous Technological Change Nordhaus, William D. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14638	report	January 2009
Future costs of key low-carbon energy technologies: Harmonization and aggregation of energy technology expert elicitation data Baker, Erin; Bosetti, Valentina; Anadon, Laura Diaz Energy Policy, Vol. 80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.008	journal	May 2015
The Perils of the Learning Model for Modeling Endogenous Technological Change Nordhaus, William D. The Energy Journal, Vol. 35, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.1.1	journal	January 2014
Judgment Under Uncertainty Newell, Ben R. Oxford Handbooks Online https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0038	book	March 2013
The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing Arrow, Kenneth J. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952	journal	June 1962
Quantifying the Effects of Expert Selection and Elicitation Design on Experts’ Confidence in Their Judgments About Future Energy Technologies: Effects of Expert Selection and Elicitation Design on Expert Confidence Nemet, Gregory F.; Anadon, Laura Diaz; Verdolini, Elena Risk Analysis, Vol. 37, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12604	journal	March 2016
Unravelling historical cost developments of offshore wind energy in Europe Voormolen, J. A.; Junginger, H. M.; van Sark, W. G. J. H. M. Energy Policy, Vol. 88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.047	journal	January 2016
Potential contribution of wind energy to climate change mitigation Barthelmie, R. J.; Pryor, S. C. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2269	journal	June 2014
The effects of expert selection, elicitation design and R&D assumptions on experts' estimates of the future costs of photovoltaics Diaz Anadon, Laura; Verdolini, E.; Lu, J. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.27107	text	January 2018
Geophysical limits to global wind power Marvel, Kate; Kravitz, Ben; Caldeira, Ken Nature Climate Change, Vol. 3, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1683	journal	September 2012
Bending the Learning Curve Witajewski, Jan; Verdolini, Elena; Tavoni, Massimo SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2630511	journal	January 2015
Cost Reduction Prospects for Offshore Wind Farms Junginger, Martin; Faaij, André; Turkenburg, Wim C. Wind Engineering, Vol. 28, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1260/0309524041210847	journal	January 2004

Cited By (19)

Assessment of Renewable Energy Deployment Roadmaps Mauleón, Ignacio Energies, Vol. 12, Issue 15 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12152875	journal	July 2019
Integrating uncertainty into public energy research and development decisions Anadón, Laura Díaz; Baker, Erin; Bosetti, Valentina Nature Energy, Vol. 2, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.71	journal	May 2017
Wind tunnel quantification of dynamic stall on an S817 airfoil and its control using synthetic jet actuators Rice, Thomas T.; Taylor, Keith; Amitay, Michael Wind Energy, Vol. 22, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2266	journal	September 2018
Electrochemically growth-controlled honeycomb-like NiMoO ₄ nanoporous network on nickel foam and its applications in all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors Kumbhar, Vijay S.; Nguyen, Van Quang; Lee, Yong Rok New Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 42, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nj02085j	journal	January 2018
Wind power potential and intermittency issues in the context of climate change Cai, Yiling; Bréon, François-Marie Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 240 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114276	journal	July 2021
Large Eddy Simuation of an Onshore Wind Farm with the Actuator Line Model Including Wind Turbine’s Control Below and Above Rated Wind Speed Guggeri, Andrés; Draper, Martín Energies, Vol. 12, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183508	journal	September 2019
Long‐Lifetime Triboelectric Nanogenerator Operated in Conjunction Modes and Low Crest Factor Li, Xinyuan; Yin, Xing; Zhao, Zhihao Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 10, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201903024	journal	January 2020
Opportunities for and challenges to further reductions in the “specific power” rating of wind turbines installed in the United States Bolinger, Mark; Lantz, Eric; Wiser, Ryan Wind Engineering https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x19901012	journal	January 2020
20% of US electricity from wind will have limited impacts on system efficiency and regional climate Pryor, S. C.; Barthelmie, R. J.; Shepherd, T. J. Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57371-1	journal	January 2020
Scavenging Wind Energy by Triboelectric Nanogenerators Chen, Bo; Yang, Ya; Wang, Zhong Lin Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 8, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702649	journal	January 2018
Wind energy variability and links to regional and synoptic scale weather Millstein, Dev; Solomon-Culp, Joshua; Wang, Meina Climate Dynamics, Vol. 52, Issue 7-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4421-y	journal	August 2018
AK‐DA: An efficient method for the fatigue assessment of wind turbine structures Huchet, Quentin; Mattrand, Cécile; Beaurepaire, Pierre Wind Energy, Vol. 22, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2312	journal	January 2019
Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen Glenk, Gunther; Reichelstein, Stefan Nature Energy, Vol. 4, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0326-1	journal	February 2019
The Influence of Real-World Wind Turbine Deployments on Local to Mesoscale Climate Pryor, S. C.; Barthelmie, R. J.; Shepherd, T. J. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1029/2017jd028114	journal	June 2018
A sunny future: expert elicitation of China's solar photovoltaic technologies Lam, Long T.; Branstetter, Lee; Azevedo, Inês L. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaab70	journal	March 2018
Profitability optimization of a wind power plant performed through different optimization algorithms and a data-driven RANS solver Santhanagopalan, Vignesh; Letizia, Stefano; Zhan, Lu 2018 Wind Energy Symposium https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-2018	conference	January 2018
Integrating uncertainty into public energy research and development decisions Anadón, Laura Díaz; Baker, Erin; Bosetti, Valentina Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.30687	text	January 2017
A new seismic‐based monitoring approach for wind turbines Hu, Weifei; Barthelmie, Rebecca J.; Letson, Frederick Wind Energy, Vol. 22, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2300	journal	December 2018
The resilience of Australian wind energy to climate change Evans, Jason P.; Kay, Merlinde; Prasad, Abhnil Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa632	journal	February 2018

Similar Records

Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs

Journal Article · Sun Sep 11 20:00:00 EDT 2016 · Nature Energy · OSTI ID:1454489

Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050

Journal Article · Wed Apr 14 20:00:00 EDT 2021 · Nature Energy · OSTI ID:1781609

Related Subjects

17 WIND ENERGY
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
LCOE
cost reduction
expert elicitation
future
innovation
technology
wind energy
wind power

Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs

Citation Formats

References (46)

Cited By (19)

Similar Records

Related Subjects