Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

In situ treatment of arsenic contaminated groundwater by aquifer iron coating: Experimental Study

Journal Article · · Science of the Total Environment, 527-528:38-46
In situ arsenic removal from groundwater by an iron coating method has great potential to be a cost effective and simple groundwater remediation technique, especially in rural and remote areas where groundwater is used as the main source of drinking water. The in situ arsenic removal technique was first optimized by simulating arsenic removal in various quartz sand columns under anoxic conditions., Its effectiveness was then evaluated in an actual high-arsenic groundwater environment. The mechanism of arsenic removal by the iron coating was investigated under different conditions using scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/X-ray absorption spectroscopy, an electron microprobe, and Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy. A 4-step alternative cycle aquifer iron coating method was developed. A continuous injection of 5 mmol/L FeSO4 and 2.5 mmol/L NaClO for 96 hours can create a uniform coating of crystalline goethite on the surface of quartz sand in the columns without causing clogging. At a flow rate of 0.45 cm/min of the injection reagents (vi), the time for arsenic (as Na2HAsO4) to pass through the iron-coated quartz sand column was approximately 35 hours, which was much longer than that for tracer fluorescein sodium (approximately 2 hours). The retardation factor of arsenic was 23, and its adsorption capacity was 0.11 mol As per mol Fe, leading to an excellent arsenic removal. In situ arsenic removal from groundwater in an aquifer was achieved by simultaneous injections of As (V) and Fe (II) reagents. When the arsenic content in the groundwater was 233 μg/L, the aqueous phase arsenic was completely removed with an arsenic adsorption of 0.05 mol As per mol Fe. Arsenic fixation resulted from a process of adsorption/co-precipitation, in which arsenic and iron likely formed the arsenic-bearing iron mineral phases with poor crystallinity by way of bidentate binuclear complexes. Thus, the high arsenic removal efficiency of the technique likely resulted from the expanded specific iron oxide/hydroxide surface area with poor crystallinity and from coprecipitation.
Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (US)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1214896
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-110142; KP1702030
Journal Information:
Science of the Total Environment, 527-528:38-46, Journal Name: Science of the Total Environment, 527-528:38-46
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

In-situ arsenic remediation by aquifer iron coating: Field trial in the Datong basin, China
Journal Article · Thu Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 2015 · Journal of Hazardous Materials · OSTI ID:1337280

In situ Fe-sulfide coating for arsenic removal under reducing conditions
Journal Article · Mon Feb 29 23:00:00 EST 2016 · Journal of Hydrology · OSTI ID:1337281

Effect of solution ionic strength and iron coatings on mineral grains on the sorption of bacterial cells to quartz sand
Journal Article · Thu Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 1994 · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · OSTI ID:111396

Related Subjects