Reliability of fracture appearance measurement in the Charpy test

Conference · Sat Dec 31 04:00:00 EST 1994

OSTI ID:115531

Dixon, B F

Despite conventional wisdom, the Charpy fracture appearance transition curve does not always coincide with the energy transition curve. Furthermore, unlike Charpy energy, fracture appearance tells how a specimen failed. It can therefore be used to meaningfully relate the results of Charpy testing to results of other toughness tests which may employ different geometries and loading rates. In order to address the question of consistency, a set of 20 specimens was prepared and used in a `round robin` survey. Results showed that agreement was greatest when operators are experienced, samples are close to fracture appearance transition, and simple, two-dimensional diagrams are sued for assessment. It was also found that certain inconsistencies exist between various assessment techniques for Charpy fracture appearance. As a part of this work, fracture appearance curves were compared to energy impact curves for the Charpy test and a similar test, the Schnadt K{sub o} test, which uses a sharp pressed notch. It was found that energy and fracture appearance transition may differ by as much as 50{degrees}C in the Charpy test while the two curves coincided in the Schnadt test. In series of toughness tests on 132 steels, the average difference between Charpy energy transition and Schnade K{sub o} energy transition was about 27{degrees}C. This is believed to represent the difference in toughness between blunt and sharp notches in Charpy size specimens.

• OSTI ID: 115531
• Report Number(s): CONF-9404233--
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE
ALLOYS
CHARPY TEST
FRACTURE MECHANICS
IMPACT STRENGTH
IMPACT TESTS
RELIABILITY