Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Flow Interactions with Strong Shocks Using Shock-Fitting Method

Other ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-649· OSTI ID:1107650
 [1];  [2]
  1. Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA (United States); University of California, Los Angeles
  2. Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)

Canonical problem of interaction of a normal shock and isotropic turbulence is fundamental to many important scientific and engineering applications. Most widely used shock capturing methods for the numerical simulation of compressible flows are inherently dissipative, only first order accurate and may incur numerical oscillations near the shock waves. Since high order methods are critical for direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows, we use a shock-fitting method that has been shown to be fifth-order accurate near as well as away from the shock. Moreover, unlike shock-capturing schemes, there are no spurious oscillations even with very strong shock waves. We carry out Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) of canonical shock-turbulence interaction problem for flows with mean Mach numbers ranging from 2 to 20 and turbulent Mach number varying from 0.12 to 0.38. A Reynolds number based on Taylor microscale, ReO , of up to 40 is used, requiring more than 30 million grid points per simulation. Such high mean Mach number values have never been considered in past for study of shock turbulence interactions. Some new trends are observed in turbulent statistics as mean Mach number is increased. Maximum value of streamwise velocity fluctuations downstream of the shock is found to be initially decreasing as Mach number is increased but for stronger than Mach 8 shocks this trend reverses. Similarly maximum streamwise vorticity fluctuations in post-shock flow first increase and then decrease as mean Mach number is increased. We observe that vorticity fluctuations return to isotropy behind the shock for some cases. Increasing mean Mach number and Reynolds number leads to delay in the return to isotropy in the vorticity fluctuations. Overall, the results generally confirm the findings by earlier numerical simulations and provide new trends for stronger shocks than those considered by numerical studies in the past.

Research Organization:
Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
FC02-06ER25797
OSTI ID:
1107650
Report Number(s):
DOE/ER/25797-7
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (39)

Direct numerical simulation of decaying compressible turbulence and shocklet statistics journal May 2001
Large-Eddy Simulation of the Shock/Turbulence Interaction journal July 1999
On high-order shock-fitting and front-tracking schemes for numerical simulation of shock–disturbance interactions journal September 2010
Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 1. Wave structures and interactions journal July 2003
Numerical Computations of Turbulence Amplification in Shock-Wave Interactions journal January 1984
Standardized pseudospectral formulation of the inviscid supsersonic blunt body problem journal June 2004
Turbulence in Supersonic Flow journal October 1953
Accuracy of Shock Capturing in Two Spatial Dimensions journal September 1999
Shock-fitted multidomain solution of supersonic flows journal July 1999
Shock Fitting Method for Complicated Two-Dimensional Supersonic Flows journal May 1976
Three-Dimensional Supersonic flow Computations journal September 1963
Inviscid flowfield about a pointed cone at an angle of attack. journal April 1967
Conservative Hybrid Compact-WENO Schemes for Shock-Turbulence Interaction journal May 2002
Linear interaction of a cylindrical entropy spot with a shock journal August 2001
Simulation of spatially evolving turbulence and the applicability of Taylor’s hypothesis in compressible flow journal July 1992
Computing unsteady shock waves for aeroacoustic applications conference August 1993
Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 3. Effects of different types of free-stream disturbances journal June 2005
Spectral methods for the Euler equations. II - Chebyshev methods andshock fitting journal February 1985
Shock-Wave-Vortex Interactions: Shock and Vortex Deformations, and Sound Production journal March 2000
Computational Study on the Interaction Between a Vortex and a Shock Wave journal February 1991
Shock‐jump relations in a turbulent flow journal December 1992
The influence of entropy fluctuations on the interaction of turbulence with a shock wave journal March 1997
Numerical Simulation of Shock-Turbulence Interactions Using High-Order Shock-Fitting Algorithms conference January 2010
High-Order Shock-Fitting and Front-Tracking Methods for Numerical Simulation of Shock-Disturbance Interactions conference January 2009
Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows journal July 1992
Consistent initial conditions for the DNS of compressible turbulence journal January 1997
The analysis and simulation of compressible turbulence journal March 1990
Spectral methods for the Euler equations - The blunt body problem revisited journal September 1991
Interaction of isotropic turbulence with a strong shock wave conference January 1994
A numerical study of two-dimensional shock vortex interaction conference June 1981
Direct Numerical Simulation of Shock-wave/Isotropic Turbulence Interaction conference June 2009
Numerical experiments on the leading-edge flowfield journal December 1982
Three-Dimensional Flow around Blunt Bodies journal September 1967
Acoustic energy flux from shock-turbulence interaction journal January 1969
Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 2. Receptivity to free-stream sound journal July 2003
Spurious Numerical Oscillations in Simulation of Supersonic Flows Using Shock-Capturing Schemes journal March 1999
Shock fitting for everybody journal September 1980
Numerical Simulations of Strong Shock and Disturbance Interactions Using High-Order Shock-Fitting Algorithms conference January 2008
Direct numerical simulation of canonical shock/turbulence interaction journal December 2009

Similar Records

Effect of compressibility on strong shock and turbulence interactions
Conference · Mon Nov 05 23:00:00 EST 2012 · OSTI ID:1107647

Numerical Simulation of Shock-Turbulence Interactions Using High-Order Shock-Fitting Algorithms
Other · Fri Jun 25 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · OSTI ID:1107655

A High-Order Shock-Fitting Non-Equilibrium Flow Solver for DNS of Strong Shock and Turbulence Interactions
Conference · Mon Jul 09 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · OSTI ID:1107644

Related Subjects