Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Rules of the game change for comparing IX to RO

Journal Article · · Power (New York)
OSTI ID:109822

This article examines how modern packed-bed demineralization with reverse-flow regeneration counters the notion that reverse osmosis is superior to ion exchange, the classical method for treating powerplant makeup water. Recently published articles argue that demineralization for industrial water treatment is steadily becoming the domain of membrane processes based on reverse osmosis (RO). For some experts, the economic crossover pint at which RO outperforms ion exchange (IX) for makeup-water demineralization occurs at a total dissolved solids (TDS) level of 75 ppm. However, three developments during the past five years have completely changed the basis for the IX-vs-RO debate, even at TDS levels as high as 400 to 500 ppm. These are: (1) An improved understanding of the operating characteristics of RO. (2) The application of jetted-resin technology for producing uniform-particle-size (UPS) resin. (3) Refinement of the packed-bed, reverse-flow (RF) demineralization technique, greatly reducing operating and capital costs.

OSTI ID:
109822
Journal Information:
Power (New York), Journal Name: Power (New York) Journal Issue: 8 Vol. 139; ISSN POWEAD; ISSN 0032-5929
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

``New`` countercurrent demineralization techniques are carving a place in water treatment
Journal Article · Sun Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 1996 · Power Engineering (Barrington) · OSTI ID:417949

Consider upflow regeneration as demineralization alternative
Journal Article · Sat Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 1995 · Power (New York) · OSTI ID:100679

Evaluation of Selective Ion Exchange Resins for Removal of Mercury from the H-Area Water Treatment Unit
Technical Report · Tue Sep 05 00:00:00 EDT 2000 · OSTI ID:762022