Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Is Bayesian inference "brittle"?

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1090693· OSTI ID:1090693
 [1];  [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)

In a recent report, “Bayesian Brittleness: Why no Bayesian model is ‘good enough,’” (arXiv, 1304.6772v1) the authors prove rigorously that model variations that are arbitrarily small, in a particular technical sense, the posterior expectation of a function can achieve essentially any value that the function alone can achieve, so that Bayesian inference appears to have no robustness whatsoever. We explain this puzzling result, and show why it does not imply a breakdown of Bayesian inference. The explanation is that the models leading to the extreme results depend on the observed data.

Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
OSTI ID:
1090693
Report Number(s):
LA-UR--13-26482
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Brittleness and Bayesian Inference
Technical Report · Thu Aug 15 00:00:00 EDT 2013 · OSTI ID:1090691

SU-E-T-144: Bayesian Inference of Local Relapse Data Using a Poisson-Based Tumour Control Probability Model
Journal Article · Mon Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22545269

Sequential Monte Carlo for Cut-Bayesian Posterior Computation
Technical Report · Wed Jan 31 23:00:00 EST 2024 · OSTI ID:2323517