Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

An Assessment of Energy Potential at Non-Powered Dams in the United States

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1039957· OSTI ID:1039957

The United States has produced clean, renewable electricity from hydropower for more than 100 years, but hydropower-producing facilities represent only a fraction of the infrastructure development that has taken place on the nation’s waterways. In contrast to the roughly 2,500 dams that provide 78 gigawatts (GW) 1 of conventional and 22 GW of pumped-storage hydropower, the United States has more than 80,000 non-powered dams (NPDs)—dams that do not produce electricity—providing a variety of services ranging from water supply to inland navigation. Importantly, many of the monetary costs and environmental impacts of dam construction have already been incurred at NPDs, so adding power to the existing dam structure can often be achieved at lower cost, with less risk, and in a shorter timeframe than development requiring new dam construction. The abundance, cost, and environmental favorability of NPDs, combined with the reliability and predictability of hydropower, make these dams a highly attractive source for expanding the nation’s renewable energy supply. To better characterize this unique national resource, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Wind and Water Power Program has undertaken a national-scale analysis of U.S. dams to determine the ability of NPDs to provide hydroelectric power. DOE’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), with input from DOE’s Idaho National Laboratory, quantified the potential capacity and generation available from adding power production capability to U.S. NPDs. Of the more than 80,000 NPDs throughout the U.S., 54,391 dams were analyzed, with remaining dams eliminated from consideration due to erroneous geographic information, or erroneous flow or drainage area attributes that could not be resolved and corrected through independent investigation of maps and records. Anecdotal information suggests that these dams with missing or erroneous information are likely to be relatively small or have low potential to produce hydroelectric energy. Dams with a reported height of less than five feet were also excluded from analysis. A thorough quality control and review process ensured that the 54,391 remaining NPDs were analyzed and characterized as accurately as possible. Figure ES-1 demonstrates the spatial and capacity potential distribution of the nation’s NPDs. Electric generating capacities included in the report were calculated using the assumption that all water passing a facility would be available for conversion into electrical energy and that hydraulic head at the facility would remain constant. The analysis did not consider the economic feasibility of developing each unpowered facility. The assessment provides preliminary information for stakeholders (such as developers, municipal planners, and policymakers), who can further evaluate the potential to increase hydropower production at NPD sites. Developers could use the information provided in this assessment to focus on more detailed analysis of sites that demonstrate a reasonable potential for being developed. Adding power to U.S. NPDs has the potential to add up to 12 GW (12,000 megawatts or MW) of new renewable capacity—a potential equivalent to increasing the size of the existing conventional hydropower fleet by 15%. A majority of this potential is concentrated in just 100 NPDs, which could contribute approximately 8 GW of clean, reliable hydropower; the top 10 facilities alone could add up to 3 GW of new hydropower. Eighty-one of the 100 top NPDs are U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) facilities, many of which, including all of the top 10, are navigation locks on the Ohio River, Mississippi River, Alabama River, and Arkansas River, as well as their major tributaries. This study also shows that dams owned by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation hold the potential to add approximately 260 MW of capacity; the Bureau has also engaged in an effort to conduct a more detailed evaluation of its own facilities.

Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Water Power Technologies Office; USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Wind Energy Technologies Office
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-00OR22725
OSTI ID:
1039957
Report Number(s):
ORNL/TM--2011/341
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English