Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Advanced sulfur control concepts for hot-gas desulfurization technology. Quarterly report, July--September 1994

Technical Report ·
OSTI ID:10119109
Primary effort during the past quarter was devoted to a thermodynamic analysis of the reduction/desulfurization and regeneration cycles of the high temperature coal gas desulfurization process. The regeneration cycle analysis concentrated upon the potential for the direct production of elemental sulfur and considered the three regeneration concepts previously identified partial oxidation in an O{sub 2}-starved environment, reaction with SO{sub 2}, and regeneration with steam. The latter concept produces H{sub 2}S instead of elemental sulfur, but is attractive because of existing technology to convert high concentrations of H{sub 2}S into sulfur. All thermodynamic analysis was based upon the principle of free energy minimization and used the computer program CHEMQ. Each candidate sorbent was evaluated over a temperature range of 600 to 1,150 K, and a pressure range of 1 to 25 atm for both the reduction/desulfurization and regeneration cycles. The thermodynamic analysis indicates that zinc oxide, in particular, has the potential for removing more than 99% of the H{sub 2}S from both the Texaco and KRW gases. Yet the possibility of forming sulfur, or even high concentrations of H{sub 2}S, during regeneration is quite small. Iron oxide, which is somewhat less effective for H{sub 2}S removal, is more amenable to elemental sulfur formation, particularly via the particle oxidation concept. The thermodynamic properties of both SnO{sub 2} and CeO{sub 2} are uniquely favorable for elemental sulfur production, but exhibit lower affinity for H{sub 2}S removal. A process involving either of the sorbents would require two-stage desulfurization to produce product gases having H{sub 2}S concentrations in the 20 ppmv range. Highlights and an overall summary are described in this quarterly report.
Research Organization:
Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)
DOE Contract Number:
AC21-94MC30012
OSTI ID:
10119109
Report Number(s):
DOE/MC/30012--3953; ON: DE95000044; BR: AA0510000
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English