skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Observations for Model Intercomparison Project (Obs4MIPs): status for CMIP6

Journal Article · · Geoscientific Model Development (Online)
 [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [3];  [5];  [6]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [7];  [8];  [9];  [8];  [4]; ORCiD logo [10];  [11];  [12];  [13] more »;  [10] « less
  1. California Inst. of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
  3. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC (United States)
  4. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD (United States)
  5. Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris (France)
  6. California Inst. of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States); National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Boulder, CO (United States)
  7. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Oberpfaffenhofen (Germany); Univ. of Bremen (Germany)
  8. European Space Agency, Harwell (United Kingdom)
  9. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, DC (United States)
  10. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva (Switzerland)
  11. Met Office, Exeter (United Kingdom)
  12. European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT), Darmstadt (Germany)
  13. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading (United Kingdom)

The Observations for Model Intercomparison Project (Obs4MIPs) was initiated in 2010 to facilitate the use of observations in climate model evaluation and research, with a particular target being the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), a major initiative of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). To this end, Obs4MIPs (1) targets observed variables that can be compared to CMIP model variables; (2) utilizes dataset formatting specifications and metadata requirements closely aligned with CMIP model output; (3) provides brief technical documentation for each dataset, designed for nonexperts and tailored towards relevance for model evaluation, including information on uncertainty, dataset merits, and limitations; and (4) disseminates the data through the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) platforms, making the observations searchable and accessible via the same portals as the model output. Taken together, these characteristics of the organization and structure of obs4MIPs should entice a more diverse community of researchers to engage in the comparison of model output with observations and to contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of the climate models. At present, the number of obs4MIPs datasets has grown to about 80; many are undergoing updates, with another 20 or so in preparation, and more than 100 are proposed and under consideration. A partial list of current global satellite-based datasets includes humidity and temperature profiles; a wide range of cloud and aerosol observations; ocean surface wind, temperature, height, and sea ice fraction; surface and top-of-atmosphere longwave and shortwave radiation; and ozone (O3), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2) products. A partial list of proposed products expected to be useful in analyzing CMIP6 results includes the following: alternative products for the above quantities, additional products for ocean surface flux and chlorophyll products, a number of vegetation products (e.g., FAPAR, LAI, burned area fraction), ice sheet mass and height, carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). While most existing obs4MIPs datasets consist of monthly-mean gridded data over the global domain, products with higher time resolution (e.g., daily) and/or regional products are now receiving more attention. Along with an increasing number of datasets, obs4MIPs has implemented a number of capability upgrades including (1) an updated obs4MIPs data specifications document that provides additional search facets and generally improves congruence with CMIP6 specifications for model datasets, (2) a set of six easily understood indicators that help guide users as to a dataset's maturity and suitability for application, and (3) an option to supply supplemental information about a dataset beyond what can be found in the standard metadata. With the maturation of the obs4MIPs framework, the dataset inclusion process, and the dataset formatting guidelines and resources, the scope of the observations being considered is expected to grow to include gridded in situ datasets as well as datasets with a regional focus, and the ultimate intent is to judiciously expand this scope to any observation dataset that has applicability for evaluation of the types of Earth system models used in CMIP.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); USDOE Office of Science (SC); National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344; NA14NES432003
OSTI ID:
1755817
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-795464; 996647
Journal Information:
Geoscientific Model Development (Online), Vol. 13, Issue 7; ISSN 1991-9603
Publisher:
European Geosciences UnionCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (32)

COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment journal August 2011
The International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMB) System: Design, Theory, and Implementation journal November 2018
Metrics for the Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation: Toward Routine Benchmarks for Climate Models journal June 2016
Toward Standardized Data Sets for Climate Model Experimentation journal July 2018
Global chemistry-climate modeling and evaluation journal December 2012
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization journal January 2016
Towards improved and more routine Earth system model evaluation in CMIP journal January 2016
ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP journal January 2016
Evolving Obs4MIPs to Support Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) journal August 2015
AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project journal December 1992
Performance metrics for climate models journal January 2008
Improving use of satellite data in evaluating climate models journal May 2011
A More Powerful Reality Test for Climate Models journal May 2016
The ESA Climate Change Initiative: Satellite Data Records for Essential Climate Variables journal October 2013
The CMIP6 Data Request (DREQ, version 01.00.31) journal January 2020
Regional Climate Model Evaluation System powered by Apache Open Climate Workbench v1.3.0: an enabling tool for facilitating regional climate studies journal January 2018
THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research journal September 2007
Evaluating Modes of Variability in Climate Models journal December 2014
Enabling Reanalysis Research Using the Collaborative Reanalysis Technical Environment (CREATE) journal April 2018
How Well Do Coupled Models Simulate Today's Climate? journal March 2008
Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – technical overview journal January 2020
The GEWEX Water Vapor Assessment: Overview and Introduction to Results and Recommendations journal January 2019
CMIP6 Data Citation of Evolving Data journal June 2017
CMIP5 Scientific Gaps and Recommendations for CMIP6 journal January 2017
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design journal April 2012
Satellite Observations for CMIP5: The Genesis of Obs4MIPs journal September 2014
The Double‐ITCZ Bias in CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6 Models Based on Annual Mean Precipitation journal April 2020
The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) Diagnostic Codes Catalogue – metrics, diagnostics and methodologies to evaluate, understand and improve the representation of clouds and cloud feedbacks in climate models journal January 2017
Global water cycle agreement in the climate models assessed in the IPCC AR4: IPCC AR4 GLOBAL WATER CYCLE MODELS journal August 2007
Cloud ice: A climate model challenge with signs and expectations of progress journal January 2009
The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) contribution to CMIP6 journal January 2017
A Global Repository for Planet-Sized Experiments and Observations journal May 2016

Similar Records

Evolving Obs4MIPs to Support Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6)
Journal Article · Wed Sep 16 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · OSTI ID:1755817

Towards improved and more routine Earth system model evaluation in CMIP
Journal Article · Tue Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Earth System Dynamics (Online) · OSTI ID:1755817

Requirements for a global data infrastructure in support of CMIP6
Journal Article · Tue Sep 11 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · Geoscientific Model Development (Online) · OSTI ID:1755817

Related Subjects