skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Landslides caused by the Mw7.8 Kaikōura earthquake and the immediate response

Journal Article · · Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [3];  [1] more »;  [1];  [4]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [5];  [6]; ORCiD logo [7];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [7] « less
  1. GNS Science, Lower Hutt (New Zealand)
  2. Massey Univ., Palmerston North (New Zealand)
  3. Federal Inst. of Technology, Zurich (Switzerland)
  4. Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch (New Zealand)
  5. USGS Landslide Team, Reston, VA (United States)
  6. Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)
  7. Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)
  8. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)
  9. Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
  10. Elixis Group Ltd. (Greece)

Tens of thousands of landslides were generated over 10,000 km2 of North Canterbury and Marlborough as a consequence of the 14 November 2016, Mw7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake. The most intense landslide damage was concentrated in 3500 km2 around the areas of fault rupture. Given the sparsely populated area affected by landslides, only a few homes were impacted and there were no recorded deaths due to landslides. Landslides caused major disruption with all road and rail links with Kaikōura being severed. The landslides affecting State Highway 1 (the main road link in the South Island of New Zealand) and the South Island main trunk railway extended from Ward in Marlborough all the way to the south of Oaro in North Canterbury. The majority of landslides occurred in two geological and geotechnically distinct materials reflective of the dominant rock types in the affected area. In the Neogene sedimentary rocks (sandstones, limestones and siltstones) of the Hurunui District, North Canterbury and around Cape Campbell in Marlborough, first-time and reactivated rock-slides and rock-block slides were the dominant landslide type. These rocks also tend to have rock material strength values in the range of 5-20 MPa. In the Torlesse ‘basement’ rocks (greywacke sandstones and argillite) of the Kaikōura Ranges, first-time rock and debris avalanches were the dominant landslide type. These rocks tend to have material strength values in the range of 20-50 MPa. A feature of this earthquake is the large number (more than 200) of valley blocking landslides it generated. This was partly due to the steep and confined slopes in the area and the widely distributed strong ground shaking. The largest landslide dam has an approximate volume of 12(±2) M m3 and the debris from this travelled about 2.7 km2 downslope where it formed a dam blocking the Hapuku River. The long-term stability of cracked slopes and landslide dams from future strong earthquakes and large rainstorms are an ongoing concern to central and local government agencies responsible for rebuilding homes and infrastructure. A particular concern is the potential for debris floods to affect downstream assets and infrastructure should some of the landslide dams breach catastrophically. At least twenty-one faults ruptured to the ground surface or sea floor, with these surface ruptures extending from the Emu Plain in North Canterbury to offshore of Cape Campbell in Marlborough. The mapped landslide distribution reflects the complexity of the earthquake rupture. Landslides are distributed across a broad area of intense ground shaking reflective of the elongate area affected by fault rupture, and are not clustered around the earthquake epicentre. The largest landslides triggered by the earthquake are located either on or adjacent to faults that ruptured to the ground surface. Surface faults may provide a plane of weakness or hydrological discontinuity and adversely oriented surface faults may be indicative of the location of future large landslides. Their location appears to have a strong structural geological control. Initial results from our landslide investigations suggest predictive models relying only on ground-shaking estimates underestimate the number and size of the largest landslides that occurred.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1580859
Journal Information:
Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 50, Issue 2; ISSN 1174-9857
Publisher:
New Zealand Society for Earthquake EngineeringCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Cited By (1)

Phased Reconnaissance Approach to Documenting Landslides following the 2016 Central Italy Earthquakes journal November 2018

Similar Records

Earthquake Risk Management of Underground Lifelines in the Urban Area of Catania
Journal Article · Tue Jul 08 00:00:00 EDT 2008 · AIP Conference Proceedings · OSTI ID:1580859

Quaternary slip rates and most recent surface rupture of the Bitterroot fault, western Montana
Journal Article · Wed Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2023 · Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology · OSTI ID:1580859

Geology and ground shaking: The April 25--26, 1992 Cape Mendocino earthquake sequence
Conference · Thu Apr 01 00:00:00 EST 1993 · Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs; (United States) · OSTI ID:1580859

Related Subjects