skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Male breast cancer incidence and mortality risk in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors – Differences in excess relative and absolute risk from female breast cancer

Journal Article · · Environmental Health Perspectives
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP151· OSTI ID:1356160
 [1];  [2]
  1. National Inst. of Health, Rockville, MD (United States). National Cancer Inst. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. Radiation Epidemiology Branch
  2. Inst. of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, Scotland (United Kingdom)

There are well-known associations of ionizing radiation with female breast cancer, and emerging evidence also for male breast cancer. In the UK, female breast cancer following occupational radiation exposure is among that set of cancers eligible for state compensation and consideration is currently being given to an extension to include male breast cancer. The objectives here, compare radiation-associated excess relative and absolute risks of male and female breast cancers. Breast cancer incidence and mortality data in the Japanese atomic-bomb survivors were analyzed using relative and absolute risk models via Poisson regression. As a result, we observed significant ( p≤ 0.01) dose-related excess risk for male breast cancer incidence and mortality. For incidence and mortality data, there are approximate 15-fold and 5- fold elevations, respectively, of relative risk for male compared with female breast cancer incidence, the former borderline significant (p = 0.050). In contrast, for incidence and mortality data there are approximate 20-fold and 10-fold elevations, respectively, of female absolute risk compared with male, both statistically significant (p < 0.001). There are no indications of differences between the sexes in age/time-since-exposure/age-at-exposure modifications to the relative or absolute excess risk. The probability of causation of male breast cancer following radiation exposure exceeds by at least 5-fold that of many other malignancies. In conclusion, there is evidence of much higher radiation-associated relative risk for male than for female breast cancer, although absolute excess risks for males are much less than for females. However, the small number of male cases and deaths suggests a degree of caution in interpretation of this finding.

Research Organization:
National Inst. of Health, Rockville, MD (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
National Inst. of Health (NIH) (United States); Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW) (Japan); USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Contributing Organization:
Inst. of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, Scotland (United Kingdom)
Grant/Contract Number:
HS0000031; SC0000031
OSTI ID:
1356160
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1358436
Journal Information:
Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 125, Issue 2; ISSN 0091-6765
Publisher:
National Institute of Environmental Health SciencesCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 16 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (27)

Genetics of Breast Cancer journal January 1997
Mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype analyses in Cowden disease and Bannayan-Zonana syndrome, two hamartoma syndromes with germline PTEN mutation journal March 1998
Radiation Effects on Breast Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Cohorts journal August 2002
Comparison of Breast Cancer Incidence in the Massachusetts Tuberculosis Fluoroscopy Cohort and in the Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors journal February 1999
Male breast cancer: genetics, epigenetics, and ethical aspects journal November 2013
Prospective Evaluation of Risk Factors for Male Breast Cancer journal October 2008
Ionizing radiation and breast cancer in men (United States) journal January 1994
Male breast cancer in Cowden syndrome patients with germline PTEN mutations journal March 2001
Light to moderate intake of alcohol, drinking patterns, and risk of cancer: results from two prospective US cohort studies journal August 2015
Likelihood of a model and information criteria journal May 1981
Carcinogenicity of alcoholic beverages journal April 2007
Genetic Heterogeneity and Penetrance Analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Breast Cancer Families journal March 1998
Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers journal January 2009
Male breast cancer and the androgen receptor gene journal October 1993
The CHEK2 gene and inherited breast cancer susceptibility journal September 2006
RadRAT: a radiation risk assessment tool for lifetime cancer risk projection journal July 2012
A germline mutation in the androgen receptor gene in two brothers with breast cancer and Reifenstein syndrome journal October 1992
Cancer statistics, 1999 journal January 1999
Male Breast Cancer Incidence Among Atomic Bomb Survivors journal April 2005
Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies journal November 2012
A case-control interview study of breast cancer among Japanese A-bomb survivors. II. Interactions with radiation dose journal March 1994
Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases journal March 2012
Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998 journal July 2007
Genetics of breast cancer journal November 1992
Generalized Linear Models journal December 2000
Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies
  • Libraries, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University
  • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University Libraries https://doi.org/10.17615/vgmv-q678
text January 2012
Genetics of breast cancer journal January 2004

Cited By (1)

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: the risky status quo and new concepts of predictive medicine journal February 2018