DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A fully Lagrangian, non-parametric bias model for dark matter halos

Abstract

We present a non-parametric Lagrangian biasing model and fit the ratio of the halo and mass densities at the field level using the mass-weighted halo field in the AbacusSummit simulations at z=0.5. Unlike the perturbative halo bias model that has been widely used in interpreting the observed large-scale structure traced by galaxies, we find a non-negative halo-to-mass ratio that increases monotonically with the linear overdensity δ1 in the initial Lagrangian space. The bias expansion, however, does not guarantee non-negativity of the halo counts, and may lead to rising halo number counts at negative overdensities. The shape of the halo-to-mass ratio is unlikely to be described by a polynomial function of δ1 and other quantities. Especially for massive halos with 6×1012h-1 M, the halo-to-mass ratio starts soaring up at δ1>0, substantially different from the predictions of the bias expansion. We show that for the halo masses we consider (M>3×1011 h-1 M) a non-parametric halo-to-mass ratio as a function of δ1 and its local derivative ∇^2δ1 can recover the halo power spectra to sub-percent level accuracy for wavenumbers k=0.01-0.1 h Mpc-1 given a proper smoothing scale to filter the initial density field, even though we do not fit the power spectrum directly.more » However, there is mild dependence of the recovery of the halo power spectrum on the smoothing scale and other input parameters. At k<0.01 h Mpc-1 and for massive halos with M>6x1012 h-1M, our non-parametric model leads to a few percent overestimation of the halo power spectrum, indicating the need for larger or multiple smoothing scales. The halo-to-mass ratios obtained qualitatively agree with intuitions from extended Press-Schechter theory. We compare our framework to the bias expansion and discuss possible extensions.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory; Simons Foundation
OSTI Identifier:
1979353
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0013718; 12-EUCLID12-0004; NAS5-02015
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 2022; Journal Issue: 02; Journal ID: ISSN 1475-7516
Publisher:
Institute of Physics (IOP)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS

Citation Formats

Wu, Xiaohan, Muñoz, Julian B., and Eisenstein, Daniel. A fully Lagrangian, non-parametric bias model for dark matter halos. United States: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/002.
Wu, Xiaohan, Muñoz, Julian B., & Eisenstein, Daniel. A fully Lagrangian, non-parametric bias model for dark matter halos. United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/002
Wu, Xiaohan, Muñoz, Julian B., and Eisenstein, Daniel. Wed . "A fully Lagrangian, non-parametric bias model for dark matter halos". United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/002. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1979353.
@article{osti_1979353,
title = {A fully Lagrangian, non-parametric bias model for dark matter halos},
author = {Wu, Xiaohan and Muñoz, Julian B. and Eisenstein, Daniel},
abstractNote = {We present a non-parametric Lagrangian biasing model and fit the ratio of the halo and mass densities at the field level using the mass-weighted halo field in the AbacusSummit simulations at z=0.5. Unlike the perturbative halo bias model that has been widely used in interpreting the observed large-scale structure traced by galaxies, we find a non-negative halo-to-mass ratio that increases monotonically with the linear overdensity δ1 in the initial Lagrangian space. The bias expansion, however, does not guarantee non-negativity of the halo counts, and may lead to rising halo number counts at negative overdensities. The shape of the halo-to-mass ratio is unlikely to be described by a polynomial function of δ1 and other quantities. Especially for massive halos with 6×1012h-1 M⊙, the halo-to-mass ratio starts soaring up at δ1>0, substantially different from the predictions of the bias expansion. We show that for the halo masses we consider (M>3×1011 h-1 M⊙) a non-parametric halo-to-mass ratio as a function of δ1 and its local derivative ∇^2δ1 can recover the halo power spectra to sub-percent level accuracy for wavenumbers k=0.01-0.1 h Mpc-1 given a proper smoothing scale to filter the initial density field, even though we do not fit the power spectrum directly. However, there is mild dependence of the recovery of the halo power spectrum on the smoothing scale and other input parameters. At k<0.01 h Mpc-1 and for massive halos with M>6x1012 h-1M⊙, our non-parametric model leads to a few percent overestimation of the halo power spectrum, indicating the need for larger or multiple smoothing scales. The halo-to-mass ratios obtained qualitatively agree with intuitions from extended Press-Schechter theory. We compare our framework to the bias expansion and discuss possible extensions.},
doi = {10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/002},
journal = {Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics},
number = 02,
volume = 2022,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Feb 02 00:00:00 EST 2022},
month = {Wed Feb 02 00:00:00 EST 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Understanding higher-order nonlocal halo bias at large scales by combining the power spectrum with the bispectrum
journal, December 2014


Cubic halo bias in Eulerian and Lagrangian space
journal, July 2018


Modeling biased tracers at the field level
journal, August 2019


How to Suppress the Shot Noise in Galaxy Surveys
journal, August 2009


Biasing and hierarchical statistics in large-scale structure
journal, August 1993

  • Fry, J. N.; Gaztanaga, Enrique
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 413
  • DOI: 10.1086/173015

An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes
journal, September 1996

  • Mo, H. J.; White, S. D. M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 282, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/282.2.347

Large-scale bias and the peak background split
journal, September 1999


Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
journal, April 2018

  • Amendola, Luca; Appleby, Stephen; Avgoustidis, Anastasios
  • Living Reviews in Relativity, Vol. 21, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3

The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
journal, May 1986

  • Bardeen, J. M.; Bond, J. R.; Kaiser, N.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 304
  • DOI: 10.1086/164143

Dancing in the dark: galactic properties trace spin swings along the cosmic web
journal, August 2014

  • Dubois, Y.; Pichon, C.; Welker, C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 444, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1227

Cosmological simulations of black hole growth: AGN luminosities and downsizing
journal, June 2014

  • Hirschmann, M.; Dolag, K.; Saro, A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 442, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1023

The Gaussian streaming model and convolution Lagrangian effective field theory
journal, December 2016

  • Vlah, Zvonimir; Castorina, Emanuele; White, Martin
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2016, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/007

Improving initial conditions for cosmological N -body simulations
journal, July 2016

  • Garrison, Lehman H.; Eisenstein, Daniel J.; Ferrer, Douglas
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 461, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1594

Exploring the squeezed three-point galaxy correlation function with generalized halo occupation distribution models
journal, April 2018

  • Yuan, Sihan; Eisenstein, Daniel J.; Garrison, Lehman H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 478, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1089

Correcting for the Alias Effect When Measuring the Power Spectrum Using a Fast Fourier Transform
journal, February 2005

  • Jing, Y. P.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 620, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/427087

Large-scale galaxy bias
journal, February 2018


Beyond LIMD bias: a measurement of the complete set of third-order halo bias parameters
journal, September 2018


Simulations and symmetries
journal, January 2020

  • Modi, Chirag; Chen, Shi-Fan; White, Martin
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 492, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa251

A robust measurement of the first higher-derivative bias of dark matter halos
journal, November 2019


Subhalo abundance matching and assembly bias in the EAGLE simulation
journal, May 2016

  • Chaves-Montero, Jonás; Angulo, Raul E.; Schaye, Joop
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 460, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1225

Renormalized halo bias
journal, August 2014

  • Assassi, Valentin; Baumann, Daniel; Green, Daniel
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 08
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/056

The Abacus Cosmos: A Suite of Cosmological N -body Simulations
journal, June 2018

  • Garrison, Lehman H.; Eisenstein, Daniel J.; Ferrer, Douglas
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 236, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aabfd3

On the spatial correlations of Abell clusters
journal, September 1984


The manifestation of secondary bias on the galaxy population from IllustrisTNG300
journal, June 2020

  • Montero-Dorta, Antonio D.; Artale, M. Celeste; Abramo, L. Raul
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 496, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1624

Assembly bias in quadratic bias parameters of dark matter halos from forward modeling
journal, October 2021

  • Lazeyras, Titouan; Barreira, Alexandre; Schmidt, Fabian
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2021, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/063

Modeling scale-dependent bias on the baryonic acoustic scale with the statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
journal, November 2010


The bahamas project: calibrated hydrodynamical simulations for large-scale structure cosmology
journal, October 2016

  • McCarthy, Ian G.; Schaye, Joop; Bird, Simeon
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2792

A high-fidelity realization of the Euclid code comparison N -body simulation with Abacus
journal, March 2019

  • Garrison, Lehman H.; Eisenstein, Daniel J.; Pinto, Philip A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 485, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz634

Modeling galaxies in redshift space at the field level
journal, May 2021

  • Schmittfull, Marcel; Simonović, Marko; Ivanov, Mikhail M.
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2021, Issue 05
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/059

Halo bias in Lagrangian space: estimators and theoretical predictions
journal, August 2017

  • Modi, Chirag; Castorina, Emanuele; Seljak, Uroš
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 472, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2148

Evidence for quadratic tidal tensor bias from the halo bispectrum
journal, October 2012


Non-local bias contribution to third-order galaxy correlations
journal, August 2015

  • Bel, J.; Hoffmann, K.; Gaztañaga, E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 453, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1600

Testing standard perturbation theory and the Eulerian local biasing scheme against N-body simulations: Testing SPT & ELB against simulations
journal, May 2011


Galaxy bias from forward models: linear and second-order bias of IllustrisTNG galaxies
journal, August 2021

  • Barreira, Alexandre; Lazeyras, Titouan; Schmidt, Fabian
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2021, Issue 08
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/029

Simulating galaxy formation with black hole driven thermal and kinetic feedback
journal, November 2016

  • Weinberger, Rainer; Springel, Volker; Hernquist, Lars
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2944

Gravity and large-scale nonlocal bias
journal, April 2012


Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters
journal, September 2020


The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
journal, November 2014

  • Schaye, Joop; Crain, Robert A.; Bower, Richard G.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 446, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2058

Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS
journal, August 2009


Velocity bias in the distribution of dark matter halos
journal, December 2015


Limitations to the ‘basic’ HOD model and beyond
journal, March 2020

  • Hadzhiyska, Boryana; Bose, Sownak; Eisenstein, Daniel
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 493, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa623

Extensions to models of the galaxy–halo connection
journal, December 2020

  • Hadzhiyska, Boryana; Bose, Sownak; Eisenstein, Daniel
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 501, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3776

LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
journal, March 2019

  • Ivezić, Željko; Kahn, Steven M.; Tyson, J. Anthony
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 873, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

The abacus cosmological N -body code
journal, September 2021

  • Garrison, Lehman H.; Eisenstein, Daniel J.; Ferrer, Douglas
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 508, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2482

First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering
journal, December 2017

  • Springel, Volker; Pakmor, Rüdiger; Pillepich, Annalisa
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 475, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

AbacusSummit : a massive set of high-accuracy, high-resolution N -body simulations
journal, September 2021

  • Maksimova, Nina A.; Garrison, Lehman H.; Eisenstein, Daniel J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 508, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2484

Very massive tracers and higher derivative biases
journal, January 2020

  • Fujita, Tomohiro; Mauerhofer, Valentin; Senatore, Leonardo
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 01
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/009

Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
journal, October 2017

  • Pillepich, Annalisa; Springel, Volker; Nelson, Dylan
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 473, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2656

Scale-dependent halo bias in the excursion set approach
journal, December 2012


Reconstructing large-scale structure with neutral hydrogen surveys
journal, November 2019

  • Modi, Chirag; White, Martin; Slosar, Anže
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/023

The cosmology dependence of galaxy clustering and lensing from a hybrid N -body–perturbation theory model
journal, May 2021

  • Kokron, Nickolas; DeRose, Joseph; Chen, Shi-Fan
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 505, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1358

Precision measurement of the local bias of dark matter halos
journal, February 2016

  • Lazeyras, Titouan; Wagner, Christian; Baldauf, Tobias
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2016, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/018

Introducing the Illustris Project: simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe
journal, August 2014

  • Vogelsberger, Mark; Genel, Shy; Springel, Volker
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 444, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1536