Effects of Respiration-Averaged Computed Tomography on Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Quantification and its Potential Impact on Gross Tumor Volume Delineation
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
Purpose: Patient respiratory motion can cause image artifacts in positron emission tomography (PET) from PET/computed tomography (CT) and change the quantification of PET for thoracic patients. In this study, respiration-averaged CT (ACT) was used to remove the artifacts, and the changes in standardized uptake value (SUV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) were quantified. Methods and Materials: We incorporated the ACT acquisition in a PET/CT session for 216 lung patients, generating two PET/CT data sets for each patient. The first data set (PET{sub HCT}/HCT) contained the clinical PET/CT in which PET was attenuation corrected with a helical CT (HCT). The second data set (PET{sub ACT}/ACT) contained the PET/CT in which PET was corrected with ACT. We quantified the differences between the two datasets in image alignment, maximum SUV (SUV{sub max}), and GTV contours. Results: Of the patients, 68% demonstrated respiratory artifacts in the PET{sub HCT}, and for all patients the artifact was removed or reduced in the corresponding PET{sub ACT}. The impact of respiration artifact was the worst for lesions less than 50 cm{sup 3} and located below the dome of the diaphragm. For lesions in this group, the mean SUV{sub max} difference, GTV volume change, shift in GTV centroid location, and concordance index were 21%, 154%, 2.4 mm, and 0.61, respectively. Conclusion: This study benchmarked the differences between the PET data with and without artifacts. It is important to pay attention to the potential existence of these artifacts during GTV contouring, as such artifacts may increase the uncertainties in the lesion volume and the centroid location.
- OSTI ID:
- 21124330
- Journal Information:
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 71, Issue 3; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.064; PII: S0360-3016(08)00419-7; Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning
Design of respiration averaged CT for attenuation correction of the PET data from PET/CT