skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Work to save dose: contrasting effective dose rates from radon exposure in workplaces and residences against the backdrop of public and occupational limits

Journal Article · · Health Physics

Office workers are exposed to radon while at work and at home. Though there has been a multitude of studies reporting the measurements of radon concentrations and potential lung and effective doses associated with radon and progeny exposure in homes, similar studies on the concentrations and subsequent effective dose rates in the non-mine workplaces are lacking. Additionally, there are few, if any, comparative analyses of radon exposures at more 'typical' workplace with residential exposures within the same county. The purposes of this study were to measure radon concentrations in office and residential spaces in the same county and explore the radiation dose implications. Sixty-five track-etch detectors were deployed in office spaces and 47 were deployed in residences, all within Los Alamos County, New Mexico, USA. The sampling periods for these measurements were generally about three months. The measured concentrations were used to calculate and compare effective dose rates resulting from exposure while at work and at home. Results showed that full-time office workers receive on average about 8 times greater exposure at home than while in the office (2.3 mSv yr-! versus 0.3 mSv yr-!). The estimated effective dose rate for a more homebound person was about 3 mSv yr-!. Estimating effective doses from background radon exposure in the same county as Los Alamos National Laboratory, with thousands of'radiological workers,' highlights interesting contrasts in radiation protection standards that span public and occupational settings. For example, the effective dose rate from background radon exposure in unregulated office spaces ranged up to 1.1 mSv yr-!, which is similar to the 1 mSv yr-! threshold for regulation ofa 'radiological worker,' as defined in the Department of Energy regulations for occupational exposure. Additionally, the estimated average effective dose total of> 3 mSv yf! from radon background exposure in homes stands in contrast to the 0.1 mSv yr-! air pathway effective public dose limit regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency for radioactive air emissions.

Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
OSTI ID:
956418
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-09-00899; LA-UR-09-899; HLTPAO; TRN: US1004055
Journal Information:
Health Physics, Vol. 97, Issue 3; ISSN 0017-9078
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (10)

Radon at workplaces other than mines and underground excavations journal January 1996
Radon Levels in United States Homes by States and Counties journal February 1991
Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies journal December 2004
The value of Seasonal Correction Factors in assessing the health risk from domestic radon—A case study in Northamptonshire, UK journal January 2007
A Combined Analysis of North American Case-Control Studies of Residential Radon and Lung Cancer journal May 2006
National and Regional Distributions of Airborne Radon Concentrations in U.S. Homes journal June 1994
Distribution of Airborne Radon-222 Concentrations in U.S. Homes journal November 1986
The u.s. Environmental Protection Agency’S Assessment of Risks from Indoor Radon journal July 2004
Radon: a special case in radiation protection journal April 2008
A Performance Evaluation of Bare Alpha Track Detectors journal February 1994