skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Can Control Banding be better than traditional Industrial Hygiene?

Conference ·
OSTI ID:951163

The answer to this question should be 'no' if you can afford it and 'yes' if you cannot. However, Control Banding (CB) is proving itself in areas with uncertainties. This could be either a lack of knowledge--as with nanomaterials or when lacking an OEL--or with the lack or expertise, as can be seen with SMEs and in Economically Developing Countries (EDCs). Over 90% of the world's workers do not have access to occupational safety, health, and hygiene (OSHH) professionals and traditional quantitative risk assessment methods to achieve prevention from acquiring work-related illness and injury. Although risk factors for work-related illness and disease are well known, until the recent growth of CB there had yet to be designed and implemented a comprehensive OSHH process that focuses on achieving minimization of these occupational risk factors for the vast majority of the global workforce. This problem exists for three primary reasons: (1) There are not a sufficient number of trained and qualified OSHH professionals worldwide to attempt to offer comparable levels of traditional services necessary to achieve prevention; (2) The vast majority of OSHH professionals, and the funds to afford their conventional approaches, are concentrated in Developed Countries, such as those in the EU and the US, whereas the greatest need for work-related disease, illness, and injury prevention lies within EDCs; and (3) Even within Developed Countries, the funding to acquire the services of OSHH professionals sits primarily within the largest of industries and governmental institutions. This problem renders a void of occupational risk management for the professions and trades within EDCs and similarly the SMEs within even the richest of Developed Countries. Further, conventional means to achieve such prevention rely heavily on exposure assessment sampling strategies that, although proven successful, are cost-prohibitive in these arenas.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
W-7405-ENG-48
OSTI ID:
951163
Report Number(s):
LLNL-CONF-410190; TRN: US0902149
Resource Relation:
Conference: Presented at: International Congress on Occupational Health 2009, Cape Town, South Africa, Mar 22 - Mar 27, 2009
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

WE-A-16A-01: International Medical Physics Symposium: Increasing Access to Medical Physics Education/Training and Research Excellence
Journal Article · Sun Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:951163

Banding the World Together; The Global Growth of Control Banding and Qualitative Occupational Risk Management
Journal Article · Thu Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2011 · Safety and Health at Work · OSTI ID:951163

Control Banding and Nanotechnology Synergist
Journal Article · Tue Dec 15 00:00:00 EST 2009 · The Synergist, vol. 21, no. 3, March 1, 2010, pp. 26-29 · OSTI ID:951163