skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Beneficial utilization of waste heat from power plants in wastewater treatment systems

Abstract

A number of wastewater treatment processes were analyzed for possible benefit in using waste heat from co-located steam-electric power plants. Three levels of treatment standards were considered, ranging from secondary treatment to stricter tertiary requirements which involve nutrient removal. Three sizes of treatment plants were analyzed, ranging from those serving 33,000 to 2,000,000 population. The processes analyzed included activated sludge, trickling filter, rotating biological contactors and the Bardenpho process. In the study, a fraction of the condenser discharge was considered mixed with primary-treated wastewater, thereby accelerating the biological secondary-treatment processes at the expense of dilution. In each case, the most cost-effective fraction of condenser flow to be utilized was determined. After treatment, a portion of the mixture would be returned to the power plant in order to recycle the corresponding condenser discharge and provide the necessary evaporative makeup for the cooling system. The balance of the mixture would constitute the water product of the treatment plant. The benefit of waste heat used to replace fuel oil in sludge digesters was also analyzed. In the case of the lowest effluent standards (Group 1), the most cost-effective secondary treatment process was activated sludge without waste-heat recycle because it is dominated by non-thermalmore » considerations. Group 2 standards were favored by rotating biological contactors with waste-heat recycle. The most advanced Group 3 standards were optimally met by the Bardenpho process, also with waste-heat recycle. In all cases, anaerobic sludge digestion with waste heat in place of fuel oil was most economical. The overall savings in levelized annual costs ranged from 1.5% for the smallest plants to 9.9% for the largest plants, by using waste heat optimally as compared with optimal systems without waste heat.« less

Authors:
;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Illinois Inst. of Tech., Chicago (USA)
OSTI Identifier:
5588634
Report Number(s):
COO-4531-6
DOE Contract Number:  
EC-77-S-02-4531
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS; WASTE HEAT; SEWAGE; WASTE PROCESSING PLANTS; WASTE HEAT UTILIZATION; ECONOMICS; WASTE WATER; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; MUNICIPAL WASTES; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCES; HEAT; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; LIQUID WASTES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; POLLUTION CONTROL; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; WASTE PRODUCT UTILIZATION; WASTES; WATER; 320603* - Energy Conservation, Consumption, & Utilization- Municipalities & Community Systems- Public Utilities- (1980-)

Citation Formats

Ni, S. N., and Obayashi, A. W. Beneficial utilization of waste heat from power plants in wastewater treatment systems. United States: N. p., 1979. Web. doi:10.2172/5588634.
Ni, S. N., & Obayashi, A. W. Beneficial utilization of waste heat from power plants in wastewater treatment systems. United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/5588634
Ni, S. N., and Obayashi, A. W. 1979. "Beneficial utilization of waste heat from power plants in wastewater treatment systems". United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/5588634. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/5588634.
@article{osti_5588634,
title = {Beneficial utilization of waste heat from power plants in wastewater treatment systems},
author = {Ni, S. N. and Obayashi, A. W.},
abstractNote = {A number of wastewater treatment processes were analyzed for possible benefit in using waste heat from co-located steam-electric power plants. Three levels of treatment standards were considered, ranging from secondary treatment to stricter tertiary requirements which involve nutrient removal. Three sizes of treatment plants were analyzed, ranging from those serving 33,000 to 2,000,000 population. The processes analyzed included activated sludge, trickling filter, rotating biological contactors and the Bardenpho process. In the study, a fraction of the condenser discharge was considered mixed with primary-treated wastewater, thereby accelerating the biological secondary-treatment processes at the expense of dilution. In each case, the most cost-effective fraction of condenser flow to be utilized was determined. After treatment, a portion of the mixture would be returned to the power plant in order to recycle the corresponding condenser discharge and provide the necessary evaporative makeup for the cooling system. The balance of the mixture would constitute the water product of the treatment plant. The benefit of waste heat used to replace fuel oil in sludge digesters was also analyzed. In the case of the lowest effluent standards (Group 1), the most cost-effective secondary treatment process was activated sludge without waste-heat recycle because it is dominated by non-thermal considerations. Group 2 standards were favored by rotating biological contactors with waste-heat recycle. The most advanced Group 3 standards were optimally met by the Bardenpho process, also with waste-heat recycle. In all cases, anaerobic sludge digestion with waste heat in place of fuel oil was most economical. The overall savings in levelized annual costs ranged from 1.5% for the smallest plants to 9.9% for the largest plants, by using waste heat optimally as compared with optimal systems without waste heat.},
doi = {10.2172/5588634},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5588634}, journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1979},
month = {Fri Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1979}
}