skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Evaluating proxies for the drivers of natural gas productivity using machine-learning models

Journal Article · · Interpretation
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3];  [4];  [5]; ORCiD logo [6]
  1. National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA (United States). Support contractor
  2. Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  3. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236-0940, USA..
  4. Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA (United States); DiGioia Gray Consulting Engineers & Scientists, Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  5. Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  6. DiGioia Gray Consulting Engineers & Scientists, Pittsburgh, PA (United States); West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV (United States)

We report the extensive development of unconventional reservoirs using horizontal drilling and multistage hydraulic fracturing has generated large volumes of reservoir characterization and production data. The analysis of this abundant data using statistical methods and advanced machine-learning (ML) techniques can provide data-driven insights into well performance. Most predictive modeling studies have focused on the impact that different well completion and stimulation strategies have on well production but have not fully exploited the available in situ rock property data to determine its role in reservoir productivity. We have used machine-learning techniques to rank rock mechanical properties, microseismic attributes, and stimulation parameters in the order of their significance for predicting natural gas production from an unconventional reservoir. The data for this study came from a hydraulically fractured well in the Marcellus Shale in Monongalia County, West Virginia. The data classes included measurements aggregated by well completion stage that included (1) gas production, (2) well-log-derived measurements including bulk density, elastic moduli, shear impedance, compressional impedance, brittleness, and gamma measurements, (3) microseismic attributes, (4) long-period long-duration (LPLD) event counts, (5) fracture counts, and (6) stimulation parameters that included the fluid injection volume and average pumping pressure. To identify observable proxies for the drivers of gas production, we evaluated five commonly used ML approaches including multivariate adaptive regression spline, Gaussian mixture model, random forest, gradient boosting, and neural network. We selected five variables including LPLD event count, seismogenic b-value, hydraulic diffusivity, cumulative moment, and fluid volume as the features most likely to impact gas productivity at the stage level in the study area. The data-driven selection of these parameters for their importance in determining gas production can help reservoir engineers design more effective hydraulic-fracture treatments in the Marcellus Shale and other similar unconventional reservoirs. Plain language summary: We use machine-learning methods and data-driven selection of reservoir parameters to rank and better understand their importance in determining gas production, which can help reservoir engineers design more effective hydraulic-fracture treatments in the Marcellus Shale and other similar unconventional reservoirs.

Research Organization:
National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, Morgantown, WV, and Albany, OR (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
Grant/Contract Number:
89243318CFE000003
OSTI ID:
1869701
Journal Information:
Interpretation, Vol. 9, Issue 4; ISSN 2324-8858
Publisher:
Society of Exploration GeophysicistsCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (33)

Hydraulic-Fracture Geomechanics and Microseismic-Source Mechanisms journal May 2013
Brittleness estimation from seismic measurements in unconventional reservoirs: Application to the Barnett Shale conference August 2013
Long-period, long-duration seismic events during hydraulic stimulation of shale and tight-gas reservoirs — Part 1: Waveform characteristics journal November 2013
A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale conference April 2013
Production Performance Evaluation from Stimulation and Completion Parameters in the Permian Basin: Data Mining Approach conference January 2019
Long-Period, Long-Duration Seismic Events and Their Probable Role in Reservoir Stimulation and Stage Productivity journal May 2019
Pore pressure behavior at the shut‐in phase and causality of large induced seismicity at Basel, Switzerland journal January 2017
The Value Proposition for Applying Advanced Completion and Stimulation Designs to the Bakken Central Basin conference September 2013
Long-period long-duration seismic events during hydraulic fracturing: Implications for tensile fracture development: LPLD Seismic Events in Surface Receivers journal May 2017
Molecular characterization of kerogen and its implications for determining hydrocarbon potential, organic matter sources and thermal maturity in Marcellus Shale journal September 2018
Impact of Geomechanics on Microseismicity
  • Agarwal, Karn; Mayerhofer, Michael J.; Warpinski, Norman R.
  • SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, All Days https://doi.org/10.2118/152835-MS
conference March 2012
Geomechanical analysis of microseismicity in an organic shale: A West Virginia Marcellus Shale example journal February 2019
Long-period, long-duration seismicity observed during hydraulic fracturing of the Marcellus Shale in Greene County, Pennsylvania journal July 2017
Characterization of fluid transport properties of reservoirs using induced microseismicity journal January 2002
Insights to fracture stimulation design in unconventional reservoirs based on machine learning modeling journal March 2019
Natural Gas From Shale Bursts Onto the Scene journal June 2010
Evaluating the Relationship Between Well Parameters and Production Using Multivariate Statistical Models: A Middle Bakken and Three Forks Case History conference February 2016
A reality check on the shale revolution journal February 2013
Breakthrough and significance of unconventional oil and gas to classical petroleum geology theory journal February 2017
Spatial variability of tight oil well productivity and the impact of technology journal June 2017
Natural Gas Plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and Potential Opportunities journal August 2010
On the stress dependence of the earthquake b value journal March 2015
Geomechanical lithology-based analysis of microseismicity in organic shale sequences: A Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale example journal October 2017
Multiple Imputation for Interval Estimation from Simple Random Samples with Ignorable Nonresponse journal June 1986
Generalized Cross-Validation as a Method for Choosing a Good Ridge Parameter journal May 1979
Geology and geomechanics of hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus shale gas play and their potential applications to the Fuling shale gas development journal July 2020
Identifying faults and fractures in unconventional reservoirs through microseismic monitoring journal July 2011
Evaluating gas production performances in marcellus using data mining technologies journal September 2014
Random Forests journal January 2001
Data Analytics for Production Optimization in Unconventional Reservoirs conference August 2015
Real-Time Use of Microseismic Monitoring for Horizontal Completion Optimization Across a Major Fault in the Eagle Ford Formation conference February 2015
Impact of Completion System, Staging, and Hydraulic Fracturing Trends in the Bakken Formation of the Eastern Williston Basin conference February 2012
Microseismic monitoring of borehole fluid injections: Data modeling and inversion for hydraulic properties of rocks journal March 2003