skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Alternate Design Concepts for the High Flux Isotope Reactor using Low-Enriched Uranium Fuel Systems: Scoping Analysis

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1501896· OSTI ID:1501896
 [1]
  1. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States). Nuclear Science and Engineering Division

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is a multi-mission research reactor dedicated mainly to isotope production, neutron scattering experiments, material irradiation, testing and activation. In the framework of non-proliferation policies, the international community is currently aiming to reduce or even eliminate, when and where possible, the use of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU: 235U/U ≥ 20 wt. %) in civilian applications. In that context, most research reactors worldwide still operating with HEU fuel are actively engaged in an effort to convert to Low Enriched Uranium fuel system (LEU: 235U/U < 20 wt. %). Within the US, the High Performance Research Reactor (USHPRR) fleet (which includes HFIR) is expected to convert to LEU fuel using the UMo “monolithic” fuel system currently under development. ORNL is responsible for the development of a LEU design for HFIR. In the past years, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) offered technical assistance to the ORNL LEU design team whenever deemed appropriate. Due to their complex nature, acceptable HFIR LEU designs identified so far, all based on the UMo monolithic fuel system, would require a substantial fabrication development effort before being proven commercially viable. In order to mitigate technical risks and reduce cost/schedule uncertainties, it appears appropriate to study alternate design solutions and alternate fuel systems as possible backup options for the HFIR conversion to LEU fuel. In that context, ANL has been exploring alternate design concepts for HFIR. Complementing the ORNL design activities, the goal is to find the best design solution for HFIR in term of cost, performance and safety. The present report summarizes the findings regarding two types of alternate conceptual design: U3Si2 designs and un-contoured UMo design. Based on available tools and methods, preliminary analysis show that both concepts could probably meet performance and steady-state safety requirements but element fabrication would remain complex and would require a non-trivial fabrication development effort.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, Office of Material Management and Minimization (M23)
DOE Contract Number:
AC02-06CH11357
OSTI ID:
1501896
Report Number(s):
ANL/RTR/TM-18/12; 147001
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English