skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Physics Design Considerations for Diagnostic X Electron Beam Transport System

Abstract

The Diagnostic X (D-X) beamlines will transport the DARHT-II beam from the end of the accelerator to the Diagnostic X firing point providing four lines of sight for x-ray radiography. The design goal for the Diagnostic X beamline is to deliver four x-ray pulses with the DARHT-II dose format and time integrated spot size on each line of sight. The D-X beamline's final focus should be compatible with a range of first conjugates from 1 m-5 m. Furthermore, the D-X beamline operational parameters and the beamline layout should not preclude a possible upgrade to additional lines of sight. The DARHT-II accelerator is designed to deliver beams at a rate of 1 pulse per minute or less. Tuning the D-X beamline with several hundred optical elements would be time consuming. Therefore, minimizing the required number of tuning shots for the D-X beamline is also an important design goal. Many different beamline configurations may be able to accomplish these design objectives, and high beam quality (i.e., high current and low emittance) must be maintained throughout the chosen beamline configuration in order to achieve the DARHT-II x-ray dose format. In general, the longer the distance a beam travels, the harder it is tomore » preserve the beam quality. Therefore, from the point of view of maintaining beam quality, it is highly desirable to minimize the beamline length. Lastly, modification to the DARHT-II building and the downstream transport should be minimized. Several processes can degrade beam quality by increasing the beam emittance, increasing the time-varying transverse beam motion, creating a beam halo, or creating a time-varying beam envelope. In this report, we consider those processes in the passive magnet lattice beamline and indicate how they constrain the beamline design. The physics design considerations for the active components such as the kicker system will be discussed in Ref. 2. In Sec. I, we discuss how beam emittance affects the x-ray forward dose. We also establish a physics design goal for the emittance growth budget. In Sec. II, we discuss how the conductivity and size of the beam pipe affects the transverse beam motion. We also discuss the emittance growth arise from the beam centroid offset. In Sec. III, we discuss the background gas focusing effects and establish the vacuum requirements. In Sec. IV, we consider the emittance growth in a bend. In Sec. V, we discuss the misalignment and corkscrew motion. The design specifications for misalignment are established. In Secs. VI and VII, we discuss the design objectives on how to extract beams from the DARHT-II beamline and how to minimize the tuning shots. The integrated spot size and final focusing are discussed in Sec. VIII. A conclusion will be presented in Sec. IX.« less

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
15013579
Report Number(s):
UCRL-ID-140189
TRN: US0600855
DOE Contract Number:  
W-7405-ENG-48
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS; 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; ACCELERATORS; BEAM EMITTANCE; CONFIGURATION; DESIGN; ELECTRON BEAMS; FOCUSING; MAGNETS; MODIFICATIONS; PHYSICS; SPECIFICATIONS; TRANSPORT; TUNING; X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY

Citation Formats

Chen, Y-J. Physics Design Considerations for Diagnostic X Electron Beam Transport System. United States: N. p., 2000. Web. doi:10.2172/15013579.
Chen, Y-J. Physics Design Considerations for Diagnostic X Electron Beam Transport System. United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/15013579
Chen, Y-J. 2000. "Physics Design Considerations for Diagnostic X Electron Beam Transport System". United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/15013579. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/15013579.
@article{osti_15013579,
title = {Physics Design Considerations for Diagnostic X Electron Beam Transport System},
author = {Chen, Y-J},
abstractNote = {The Diagnostic X (D-X) beamlines will transport the DARHT-II beam from the end of the accelerator to the Diagnostic X firing point providing four lines of sight for x-ray radiography. The design goal for the Diagnostic X beamline is to deliver four x-ray pulses with the DARHT-II dose format and time integrated spot size on each line of sight. The D-X beamline's final focus should be compatible with a range of first conjugates from 1 m-5 m. Furthermore, the D-X beamline operational parameters and the beamline layout should not preclude a possible upgrade to additional lines of sight. The DARHT-II accelerator is designed to deliver beams at a rate of 1 pulse per minute or less. Tuning the D-X beamline with several hundred optical elements would be time consuming. Therefore, minimizing the required number of tuning shots for the D-X beamline is also an important design goal. Many different beamline configurations may be able to accomplish these design objectives, and high beam quality (i.e., high current and low emittance) must be maintained throughout the chosen beamline configuration in order to achieve the DARHT-II x-ray dose format. In general, the longer the distance a beam travels, the harder it is to preserve the beam quality. Therefore, from the point of view of maintaining beam quality, it is highly desirable to minimize the beamline length. Lastly, modification to the DARHT-II building and the downstream transport should be minimized. Several processes can degrade beam quality by increasing the beam emittance, increasing the time-varying transverse beam motion, creating a beam halo, or creating a time-varying beam envelope. In this report, we consider those processes in the passive magnet lattice beamline and indicate how they constrain the beamline design. The physics design considerations for the active components such as the kicker system will be discussed in Ref. 2. In Sec. I, we discuss how beam emittance affects the x-ray forward dose. We also establish a physics design goal for the emittance growth budget. In Sec. II, we discuss how the conductivity and size of the beam pipe affects the transverse beam motion. We also discuss the emittance growth arise from the beam centroid offset. In Sec. III, we discuss the background gas focusing effects and establish the vacuum requirements. In Sec. IV, we consider the emittance growth in a bend. In Sec. V, we discuss the misalignment and corkscrew motion. The design specifications for misalignment are established. In Secs. VI and VII, we discuss the design objectives on how to extract beams from the DARHT-II beamline and how to minimize the tuning shots. The integrated spot size and final focusing are discussed in Sec. VIII. A conclusion will be presented in Sec. IX.},
doi = {10.2172/15013579},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/15013579}, journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Apr 10 00:00:00 EDT 2000},
month = {Mon Apr 10 00:00:00 EDT 2000}
}